Age and the Explanation of Crime, Revisited

Gary Sweeten, Alex R. Piquero, Laurence Steinberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

150 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Age is one of the most robust correlates of criminal behavior. Yet, explanations for this relationship are varied and conflicting. Developmental theories point to a multitude of sociological, psychological, and biological changes that occur during adolescence and adulthood. One prominent criminological perspective outlined by Gottfredson and Hirschi claims that age has a direct effect on crime, inexplicable from sociological and psychological variables. Despite the attention this claim has received, few direct empirical tests of it have been conducted. We use data from Pathways to Desistance, a longitudinal study of over 1,300 serious youthful offenders (85.8 % male, 40.1 % African-American, 34.3 % Hispanic, 21.0 % White), to test this claim. On average, youths were 16.5 years old at the initial interview and were followed for 7 years. We use multilevel longitudinal models to assess the extent to which the direct effects of age are reduced to statistical and substantive non-significance when constructs from a wide range of developmental and criminological theories are controlled. Unlike previous studies, we are able to control for changes across numerous realms emphasized within differing theoretical perspectives including social control (e. g., employment and marriage), procedural justice (e. g., perceptions of the legitimacy and fairness of the legal system), learning (e. g., gang membership and exposure to antisocial peers), strain (e. g., victimization and relationship breakup), psychosocial maturity (e. g., impulse control, self-regulation and moral disengagement), and rational choice (e. g., costs and rewards of crime). Assessed separately, these perspectives explain anywhere from 3 % (procedural justice) to 49 % (social learning) of the age-crime relationship. Together, changes in these constructs explain 69 % of the drop in crime from ages 15 to 25. We conclude that the relationship between age and crime in adolescence and early adulthood is largely explainable, though not entirely, attributable to multiple co-occurring developmental changes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)921-938
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Youth and Adolescence
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Crime
offense
Social Justice
adulthood
adolescence
Psychology
Illegitimacy
justice
Crime Victims
Marriage
Reward
Hispanic Americans
criminality
African Americans
disengagement
social learning
Longitudinal Studies
social control
self-regulation
maturity

Keywords

  • Age
  • Crime
  • Multilevel regression
  • Offending
  • Time-varying covariates

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Age and the Explanation of Crime, Revisited. / Sweeten, Gary; Piquero, Alex R.; Steinberg, Laurence.

In: Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol. 42, No. 6, 06.2013, p. 921-938.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sweeten, Gary ; Piquero, Alex R. ; Steinberg, Laurence. / Age and the Explanation of Crime, Revisited. In: Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2013 ; Vol. 42, No. 6. pp. 921-938.
@article{e73ac1688c4947c08ac0ce0647e57018,
title = "Age and the Explanation of Crime, Revisited",
abstract = "Age is one of the most robust correlates of criminal behavior. Yet, explanations for this relationship are varied and conflicting. Developmental theories point to a multitude of sociological, psychological, and biological changes that occur during adolescence and adulthood. One prominent criminological perspective outlined by Gottfredson and Hirschi claims that age has a direct effect on crime, inexplicable from sociological and psychological variables. Despite the attention this claim has received, few direct empirical tests of it have been conducted. We use data from Pathways to Desistance, a longitudinal study of over 1,300 serious youthful offenders (85.8 {\%} male, 40.1 {\%} African-American, 34.3 {\%} Hispanic, 21.0 {\%} White), to test this claim. On average, youths were 16.5 years old at the initial interview and were followed for 7 years. We use multilevel longitudinal models to assess the extent to which the direct effects of age are reduced to statistical and substantive non-significance when constructs from a wide range of developmental and criminological theories are controlled. Unlike previous studies, we are able to control for changes across numerous realms emphasized within differing theoretical perspectives including social control (e. g., employment and marriage), procedural justice (e. g., perceptions of the legitimacy and fairness of the legal system), learning (e. g., gang membership and exposure to antisocial peers), strain (e. g., victimization and relationship breakup), psychosocial maturity (e. g., impulse control, self-regulation and moral disengagement), and rational choice (e. g., costs and rewards of crime). Assessed separately, these perspectives explain anywhere from 3 {\%} (procedural justice) to 49 {\%} (social learning) of the age-crime relationship. Together, changes in these constructs explain 69 {\%} of the drop in crime from ages 15 to 25. We conclude that the relationship between age and crime in adolescence and early adulthood is largely explainable, though not entirely, attributable to multiple co-occurring developmental changes.",
keywords = "Age, Crime, Multilevel regression, Offending, Time-varying covariates",
author = "Gary Sweeten and Piquero, {Alex R.} and Laurence Steinberg",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10964-013-9926-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "921--938",
journal = "Journal of Youth and Adolescence",
issn = "0047-2891",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Age and the Explanation of Crime, Revisited

AU - Sweeten, Gary

AU - Piquero, Alex R.

AU - Steinberg, Laurence

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Age is one of the most robust correlates of criminal behavior. Yet, explanations for this relationship are varied and conflicting. Developmental theories point to a multitude of sociological, psychological, and biological changes that occur during adolescence and adulthood. One prominent criminological perspective outlined by Gottfredson and Hirschi claims that age has a direct effect on crime, inexplicable from sociological and psychological variables. Despite the attention this claim has received, few direct empirical tests of it have been conducted. We use data from Pathways to Desistance, a longitudinal study of over 1,300 serious youthful offenders (85.8 % male, 40.1 % African-American, 34.3 % Hispanic, 21.0 % White), to test this claim. On average, youths were 16.5 years old at the initial interview and were followed for 7 years. We use multilevel longitudinal models to assess the extent to which the direct effects of age are reduced to statistical and substantive non-significance when constructs from a wide range of developmental and criminological theories are controlled. Unlike previous studies, we are able to control for changes across numerous realms emphasized within differing theoretical perspectives including social control (e. g., employment and marriage), procedural justice (e. g., perceptions of the legitimacy and fairness of the legal system), learning (e. g., gang membership and exposure to antisocial peers), strain (e. g., victimization and relationship breakup), psychosocial maturity (e. g., impulse control, self-regulation and moral disengagement), and rational choice (e. g., costs and rewards of crime). Assessed separately, these perspectives explain anywhere from 3 % (procedural justice) to 49 % (social learning) of the age-crime relationship. Together, changes in these constructs explain 69 % of the drop in crime from ages 15 to 25. We conclude that the relationship between age and crime in adolescence and early adulthood is largely explainable, though not entirely, attributable to multiple co-occurring developmental changes.

AB - Age is one of the most robust correlates of criminal behavior. Yet, explanations for this relationship are varied and conflicting. Developmental theories point to a multitude of sociological, psychological, and biological changes that occur during adolescence and adulthood. One prominent criminological perspective outlined by Gottfredson and Hirschi claims that age has a direct effect on crime, inexplicable from sociological and psychological variables. Despite the attention this claim has received, few direct empirical tests of it have been conducted. We use data from Pathways to Desistance, a longitudinal study of over 1,300 serious youthful offenders (85.8 % male, 40.1 % African-American, 34.3 % Hispanic, 21.0 % White), to test this claim. On average, youths were 16.5 years old at the initial interview and were followed for 7 years. We use multilevel longitudinal models to assess the extent to which the direct effects of age are reduced to statistical and substantive non-significance when constructs from a wide range of developmental and criminological theories are controlled. Unlike previous studies, we are able to control for changes across numerous realms emphasized within differing theoretical perspectives including social control (e. g., employment and marriage), procedural justice (e. g., perceptions of the legitimacy and fairness of the legal system), learning (e. g., gang membership and exposure to antisocial peers), strain (e. g., victimization and relationship breakup), psychosocial maturity (e. g., impulse control, self-regulation and moral disengagement), and rational choice (e. g., costs and rewards of crime). Assessed separately, these perspectives explain anywhere from 3 % (procedural justice) to 49 % (social learning) of the age-crime relationship. Together, changes in these constructs explain 69 % of the drop in crime from ages 15 to 25. We conclude that the relationship between age and crime in adolescence and early adulthood is largely explainable, though not entirely, attributable to multiple co-occurring developmental changes.

KW - Age

KW - Crime

KW - Multilevel regression

KW - Offending

KW - Time-varying covariates

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877606232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877606232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10964-013-9926-4

DO - 10.1007/s10964-013-9926-4

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 921

EP - 938

JO - Journal of Youth and Adolescence

JF - Journal of Youth and Adolescence

SN - 0047-2891

IS - 6

ER -