After the Stop: Exploring the Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Police Use of Force During Terry Stops

Weston J. Morrow, Michael White, Henry Fradella

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Questions surrounding stop, question, and frisk (SQF) practices have focused almost exclusively on racial and ethnic disproportionality in the rate of stops, and whether police are engaged in racial profiling. This near-sole focus on the stop decision has overshadowed important questions about the use of force during Terry stops, resulting in a major gap in our understanding of the dynamics of SQF encounters. The current study addresses this issue through an examination of the nature, prevalence, and predictors of use of force during Terry stops using the 2012 SQF database of New York Police Department (NYPD; N = 519,948) and data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Results indicate that use of force was an infrequent event in NYPD stops (14%), and weapon force was quite rare (.01%). However, hierarchical multinomial logistic regression models show that Black and Hispanic citizens were significantly more likely to experience non-weapon force than White citizens, while controlling for other relevant situational and precinct-level variables. The findings suggest that minority citizens may be exposed to a racial or ethnic “double jeopardy,” whereby they are subjected to both unconstitutional stops and disparate rates of force during those stops. The study highlights the importance of expanding the focus on SQF beyond the racial profiling lens, as questions about the dynamics of police use of force decision-making raise equally important social and legal concerns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-396
Number of pages30
JournalPolice Quarterly
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

police
citizen
weapon
census
logistics
minority
decision making
regression
examination
event
experience

Keywords

  • ethnicity
  • NYPD
  • police use of force
  • race
  • stop and frisk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Law

Cite this

After the Stop : Exploring the Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Police Use of Force During Terry Stops. / Morrow, Weston J.; White, Michael; Fradella, Henry.

In: Police Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 367-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2337874d5d02420ab504afd487e2153f,
title = "After the Stop: Exploring the Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Police Use of Force During Terry Stops",
abstract = "Questions surrounding stop, question, and frisk (SQF) practices have focused almost exclusively on racial and ethnic disproportionality in the rate of stops, and whether police are engaged in racial profiling. This near-sole focus on the stop decision has overshadowed important questions about the use of force during Terry stops, resulting in a major gap in our understanding of the dynamics of SQF encounters. The current study addresses this issue through an examination of the nature, prevalence, and predictors of use of force during Terry stops using the 2012 SQF database of New York Police Department (NYPD; N = 519,948) and data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Results indicate that use of force was an infrequent event in NYPD stops (14{\%}), and weapon force was quite rare (.01{\%}). However, hierarchical multinomial logistic regression models show that Black and Hispanic citizens were significantly more likely to experience non-weapon force than White citizens, while controlling for other relevant situational and precinct-level variables. The findings suggest that minority citizens may be exposed to a racial or ethnic “double jeopardy,” whereby they are subjected to both unconstitutional stops and disparate rates of force during those stops. The study highlights the importance of expanding the focus on SQF beyond the racial profiling lens, as questions about the dynamics of police use of force decision-making raise equally important social and legal concerns.",
keywords = "ethnicity, NYPD, police use of force, race, stop and frisk",
author = "Morrow, {Weston J.} and Michael White and Henry Fradella",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1098611117708791",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "367--396",
journal = "Police Quarterly",
issn = "1098-6111",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - After the Stop

T2 - Exploring the Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Police Use of Force During Terry Stops

AU - Morrow, Weston J.

AU - White, Michael

AU - Fradella, Henry

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Questions surrounding stop, question, and frisk (SQF) practices have focused almost exclusively on racial and ethnic disproportionality in the rate of stops, and whether police are engaged in racial profiling. This near-sole focus on the stop decision has overshadowed important questions about the use of force during Terry stops, resulting in a major gap in our understanding of the dynamics of SQF encounters. The current study addresses this issue through an examination of the nature, prevalence, and predictors of use of force during Terry stops using the 2012 SQF database of New York Police Department (NYPD; N = 519,948) and data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Results indicate that use of force was an infrequent event in NYPD stops (14%), and weapon force was quite rare (.01%). However, hierarchical multinomial logistic regression models show that Black and Hispanic citizens were significantly more likely to experience non-weapon force than White citizens, while controlling for other relevant situational and precinct-level variables. The findings suggest that minority citizens may be exposed to a racial or ethnic “double jeopardy,” whereby they are subjected to both unconstitutional stops and disparate rates of force during those stops. The study highlights the importance of expanding the focus on SQF beyond the racial profiling lens, as questions about the dynamics of police use of force decision-making raise equally important social and legal concerns.

AB - Questions surrounding stop, question, and frisk (SQF) practices have focused almost exclusively on racial and ethnic disproportionality in the rate of stops, and whether police are engaged in racial profiling. This near-sole focus on the stop decision has overshadowed important questions about the use of force during Terry stops, resulting in a major gap in our understanding of the dynamics of SQF encounters. The current study addresses this issue through an examination of the nature, prevalence, and predictors of use of force during Terry stops using the 2012 SQF database of New York Police Department (NYPD; N = 519,948) and data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Results indicate that use of force was an infrequent event in NYPD stops (14%), and weapon force was quite rare (.01%). However, hierarchical multinomial logistic regression models show that Black and Hispanic citizens were significantly more likely to experience non-weapon force than White citizens, while controlling for other relevant situational and precinct-level variables. The findings suggest that minority citizens may be exposed to a racial or ethnic “double jeopardy,” whereby they are subjected to both unconstitutional stops and disparate rates of force during those stops. The study highlights the importance of expanding the focus on SQF beyond the racial profiling lens, as questions about the dynamics of police use of force decision-making raise equally important social and legal concerns.

KW - ethnicity

KW - NYPD

KW - police use of force

KW - race

KW - stop and frisk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032883723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032883723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1098611117708791

DO - 10.1177/1098611117708791

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85032883723

VL - 20

SP - 367

EP - 396

JO - Police Quarterly

JF - Police Quarterly

SN - 1098-6111

IS - 4

ER -