Affirmative action and university fit: evidence from Proposition 209

Peter Arcidiacono, Esteban Aucejo, Patrick Coate, V. Joseph Hotz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Proposition 209 banned the use of racial preferences in admissions at public colleges in California. We analyze unique data for all applicants and enrollees within the University of California (UC) system before and after Prop 209. After Prop 209, minority graduation rates increased by 4.35 percentage points. We present evidence that certain institutions are better at graduating more-prepared students while other institutions are better at graduating less-prepared students and that these matching effects are particularly important for the bottom tail of the qualification distribution. We find that Prop 209 led to a more efficient sorting of minority students, explaining 18% of the graduation rate increase in our preferred specification. Further, there appears to have been behavioral responses to Prop 209, by universities and/or students, that explain between 23% and 64% of the graduation rate increase. JEL codes: I28; J15

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number7
JournalIZA Journal of Labor Economics
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Graduation
Affirmative action
Minorities
Qualification
Sorting
Behavioral response
Admission

Keywords

  • Affirmative action
  • College enrollment
  • College graduation
  • Mismatch

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Industrial relations
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Affirmative action and university fit : evidence from Proposition 209. / Arcidiacono, Peter; Aucejo, Esteban; Coate, Patrick; Hotz, V. Joseph.

In: IZA Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1, 7, 01.12.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arcidiacono, Peter ; Aucejo, Esteban ; Coate, Patrick ; Hotz, V. Joseph. / Affirmative action and university fit : evidence from Proposition 209. In: IZA Journal of Labor Economics. 2014 ; Vol. 3, No. 1.
@article{94dd2d59ad4842c1afca7feac230b286,
title = "Affirmative action and university fit: evidence from Proposition 209",
abstract = "Proposition 209 banned the use of racial preferences in admissions at public colleges in California. We analyze unique data for all applicants and enrollees within the University of California (UC) system before and after Prop 209. After Prop 209, minority graduation rates increased by 4.35 percentage points. We present evidence that certain institutions are better at graduating more-prepared students while other institutions are better at graduating less-prepared students and that these matching effects are particularly important for the bottom tail of the qualification distribution. We find that Prop 209 led to a more efficient sorting of minority students, explaining 18{\%} of the graduation rate increase in our preferred specification. Further, there appears to have been behavioral responses to Prop 209, by universities and/or students, that explain between 23{\%} and 64{\%} of the graduation rate increase. JEL codes: I28; J15",
keywords = "Affirmative action, College enrollment, College graduation, Mismatch",
author = "Peter Arcidiacono and Esteban Aucejo and Patrick Coate and Hotz, {V. Joseph}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/2193-8997-3-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
journal = "IZA Journal of Labor Economics",
issn = "2193-8997",
publisher = "Springer Open",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Affirmative action and university fit

T2 - evidence from Proposition 209

AU - Arcidiacono, Peter

AU - Aucejo, Esteban

AU - Coate, Patrick

AU - Hotz, V. Joseph

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Proposition 209 banned the use of racial preferences in admissions at public colleges in California. We analyze unique data for all applicants and enrollees within the University of California (UC) system before and after Prop 209. After Prop 209, minority graduation rates increased by 4.35 percentage points. We present evidence that certain institutions are better at graduating more-prepared students while other institutions are better at graduating less-prepared students and that these matching effects are particularly important for the bottom tail of the qualification distribution. We find that Prop 209 led to a more efficient sorting of minority students, explaining 18% of the graduation rate increase in our preferred specification. Further, there appears to have been behavioral responses to Prop 209, by universities and/or students, that explain between 23% and 64% of the graduation rate increase. JEL codes: I28; J15

AB - Proposition 209 banned the use of racial preferences in admissions at public colleges in California. We analyze unique data for all applicants and enrollees within the University of California (UC) system before and after Prop 209. After Prop 209, minority graduation rates increased by 4.35 percentage points. We present evidence that certain institutions are better at graduating more-prepared students while other institutions are better at graduating less-prepared students and that these matching effects are particularly important for the bottom tail of the qualification distribution. We find that Prop 209 led to a more efficient sorting of minority students, explaining 18% of the graduation rate increase in our preferred specification. Further, there appears to have been behavioral responses to Prop 209, by universities and/or students, that explain between 23% and 64% of the graduation rate increase. JEL codes: I28; J15

KW - Affirmative action

KW - College enrollment

KW - College graduation

KW - Mismatch

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983288457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983288457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/2193-8997-3-7

DO - 10.1186/2193-8997-3-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84983288457

VL - 3

JO - IZA Journal of Labor Economics

JF - IZA Journal of Labor Economics

SN - 2193-8997

IS - 1

M1 - 7

ER -