Afferent and efferent aspects of mandibular sensorimotor control in adults who stutter

Ayoub Daliri, Roman A. Prokopenko, Ludo Max

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Individuals who stutter show sensorimotor deficiencies in speech and nonspeech movements. For the mandibular system, the authors dissociated the sense of kinesthesia from the efferent control component to examine whether kinesthetic integrity itself is compromised in stuttering or whether deficiencies occur only when generating motor commands. Method: The authors investigated 11 stuttering and 11 nonstuttering adults' kinesthetic sensitivity threshold and kinesthetic accuracy for passive jaw movements as well as their minimal displacement threshold and positioning accuracy for active jaw movements. They also investigated the correlation with an anatomical index of jaw size. Results: The groups showed no statistically significant differences on sensory measures for passive jaw movements. Although some stuttering individuals performed more poorly than any nonstuttering participants on the active movement tasks, between-group differences for active movements were not statistically significant. Unlike fluent speakers, however, the stuttering group showed a statistically significant correlation between mandibular size and performance in the active and passive near-threshold tasks. Conclusions: Previously reported minimal-movement differences were not replicated. Instead, stuttering individuals' performance varied with anatomical properties. These correlational results are consistent with the hypothesis that stuttering participants generate and perceive movements on the basis of less accurate internal models of the involved neuromechanical systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1774-1788
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume56
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stuttering
Jaw
Group
performance
integrity
Kinesthesis
Sensorimotor
Stutter

Keywords

  • Internal model
  • Kinesthesia
  • Movement planning
  • Sensorimotor control
  • Stuttering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Afferent and efferent aspects of mandibular sensorimotor control in adults who stutter. / Daliri, Ayoub; Prokopenko, Roman A.; Max, Ludo.

In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Vol. 56, No. 6, 01.12.2013, p. 1774-1788.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bfec261932894be4aefe2df43245c46d,
title = "Afferent and efferent aspects of mandibular sensorimotor control in adults who stutter",
abstract = "Purpose: Individuals who stutter show sensorimotor deficiencies in speech and nonspeech movements. For the mandibular system, the authors dissociated the sense of kinesthesia from the efferent control component to examine whether kinesthetic integrity itself is compromised in stuttering or whether deficiencies occur only when generating motor commands. Method: The authors investigated 11 stuttering and 11 nonstuttering adults' kinesthetic sensitivity threshold and kinesthetic accuracy for passive jaw movements as well as their minimal displacement threshold and positioning accuracy for active jaw movements. They also investigated the correlation with an anatomical index of jaw size. Results: The groups showed no statistically significant differences on sensory measures for passive jaw movements. Although some stuttering individuals performed more poorly than any nonstuttering participants on the active movement tasks, between-group differences for active movements were not statistically significant. Unlike fluent speakers, however, the stuttering group showed a statistically significant correlation between mandibular size and performance in the active and passive near-threshold tasks. Conclusions: Previously reported minimal-movement differences were not replicated. Instead, stuttering individuals' performance varied with anatomical properties. These correlational results are consistent with the hypothesis that stuttering participants generate and perceive movements on the basis of less accurate internal models of the involved neuromechanical systems.",
keywords = "Internal model, Kinesthesia, Movement planning, Sensorimotor control, Stuttering",
author = "Ayoub Daliri and Prokopenko, {Roman A.} and Ludo Max",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0134)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "1774--1788",
journal = "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research",
issn = "1092-4388",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Afferent and efferent aspects of mandibular sensorimotor control in adults who stutter

AU - Daliri, Ayoub

AU - Prokopenko, Roman A.

AU - Max, Ludo

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - Purpose: Individuals who stutter show sensorimotor deficiencies in speech and nonspeech movements. For the mandibular system, the authors dissociated the sense of kinesthesia from the efferent control component to examine whether kinesthetic integrity itself is compromised in stuttering or whether deficiencies occur only when generating motor commands. Method: The authors investigated 11 stuttering and 11 nonstuttering adults' kinesthetic sensitivity threshold and kinesthetic accuracy for passive jaw movements as well as their minimal displacement threshold and positioning accuracy for active jaw movements. They also investigated the correlation with an anatomical index of jaw size. Results: The groups showed no statistically significant differences on sensory measures for passive jaw movements. Although some stuttering individuals performed more poorly than any nonstuttering participants on the active movement tasks, between-group differences for active movements were not statistically significant. Unlike fluent speakers, however, the stuttering group showed a statistically significant correlation between mandibular size and performance in the active and passive near-threshold tasks. Conclusions: Previously reported minimal-movement differences were not replicated. Instead, stuttering individuals' performance varied with anatomical properties. These correlational results are consistent with the hypothesis that stuttering participants generate and perceive movements on the basis of less accurate internal models of the involved neuromechanical systems.

AB - Purpose: Individuals who stutter show sensorimotor deficiencies in speech and nonspeech movements. For the mandibular system, the authors dissociated the sense of kinesthesia from the efferent control component to examine whether kinesthetic integrity itself is compromised in stuttering or whether deficiencies occur only when generating motor commands. Method: The authors investigated 11 stuttering and 11 nonstuttering adults' kinesthetic sensitivity threshold and kinesthetic accuracy for passive jaw movements as well as their minimal displacement threshold and positioning accuracy for active jaw movements. They also investigated the correlation with an anatomical index of jaw size. Results: The groups showed no statistically significant differences on sensory measures for passive jaw movements. Although some stuttering individuals performed more poorly than any nonstuttering participants on the active movement tasks, between-group differences for active movements were not statistically significant. Unlike fluent speakers, however, the stuttering group showed a statistically significant correlation between mandibular size and performance in the active and passive near-threshold tasks. Conclusions: Previously reported minimal-movement differences were not replicated. Instead, stuttering individuals' performance varied with anatomical properties. These correlational results are consistent with the hypothesis that stuttering participants generate and perceive movements on the basis of less accurate internal models of the involved neuromechanical systems.

KW - Internal model

KW - Kinesthesia

KW - Movement planning

KW - Sensorimotor control

KW - Stuttering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891532534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891532534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0134)

DO - 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0134)

M3 - Article

C2 - 23816664

AN - SCOPUS:84891532534

VL - 56

SP - 1774

EP - 1788

JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

SN - 1092-4388

IS - 6

ER -