Advocacy by Social Workers in the Public Defender’s Office

Jose Ashford, Mary Wirtz Macht, Melissa Mylym

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lack of consensus in the literature of advocacy is demonstrated in the dichotomy between the “best interest” and “pure advocacy” approaches. This lack of consensus has resulted in differential interpretations of how practitioners should implement the advocacy role in legal settings and has created ethical problems for practitioners that the NASW Code of Ethics cannot resolve.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-204
Number of pages6
JournalSocial Work (United States)
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

public office
social worker
lack
moral philosophy
interpretation
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Advocacy by Social Workers in the Public Defender’s Office. / Ashford, Jose; Macht, Mary Wirtz; Mylym, Melissa.

In: Social Work (United States), Vol. 32, No. 3, 1987, p. 199-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ashford, Jose ; Macht, Mary Wirtz ; Mylym, Melissa. / Advocacy by Social Workers in the Public Defender’s Office. In: Social Work (United States). 1987 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 199-204.
@article{cafb1903d8184507a7e76a327462f4db,
title = "Advocacy by Social Workers in the Public Defender’s Office",
abstract = "Lack of consensus in the literature of advocacy is demonstrated in the dichotomy between the “best interest” and “pure advocacy” approaches. This lack of consensus has resulted in differential interpretations of how practitioners should implement the advocacy role in legal settings and has created ethical problems for practitioners that the NASW Code of Ethics cannot resolve.",
author = "Jose Ashford and Macht, {Mary Wirtz} and Melissa Mylym",
year = "1987",
doi = "10.1093/sw/32.3.199",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "199--204",
journal = "Social Work (United States)",
issn = "0037-8046",
publisher = "National Association of Social Workers",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advocacy by Social Workers in the Public Defender’s Office

AU - Ashford, Jose

AU - Macht, Mary Wirtz

AU - Mylym, Melissa

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - Lack of consensus in the literature of advocacy is demonstrated in the dichotomy between the “best interest” and “pure advocacy” approaches. This lack of consensus has resulted in differential interpretations of how practitioners should implement the advocacy role in legal settings and has created ethical problems for practitioners that the NASW Code of Ethics cannot resolve.

AB - Lack of consensus in the literature of advocacy is demonstrated in the dichotomy between the “best interest” and “pure advocacy” approaches. This lack of consensus has resulted in differential interpretations of how practitioners should implement the advocacy role in legal settings and has created ethical problems for practitioners that the NASW Code of Ethics cannot resolve.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928462298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928462298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/sw/32.3.199

DO - 10.1093/sw/32.3.199

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928462298

VL - 32

SP - 199

EP - 204

JO - Social Work (United States)

JF - Social Work (United States)

SN - 0037-8046

IS - 3

ER -