Adverse effects of fluorescent dust marking on the behavior of western black widow spiderlings

Meghan B. Still, Lindsay S. Miles, Theresa M. Gburek, James Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Fluorescent dust marking is commonly employed to identify and track small arthropods for studies of ecology, demography, and behavior. Despite its widespread use, no study to date has empirically tested the suitability of dust marking for studies of spider behavior. Here, we test the effects of fluorescent dust marking on proximity of cohabitation, sibling cannibalism, and non-cannibalistic mortality of western black widow spiderlings, Latrodectus hesperus Chamberlin & Ivie (Araneae: Theridiidae). Results indicate that dust-marked spiderlings cohabitated at closer proximities and died sooner than undusted spiderlings due to a greater incidence of cannibalism in the dust-marked group. Thus, we conclude that fluorescent dust marking significantly affected the cohabitation and cannibalistic behavior of L. hesperus spiderlings. Although few studies have reported adverse effects of dust marking on arthropods, our results should serve as a warning to future studies that normal behavior may be disrupted by the use of these fluorescent dust markers. Therefore, preliminary testing should be routine when determining the suitability of any marking technique for not only new species, but also new life stages and behaviors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-31
Number of pages4
JournalEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
Volume150
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Keywords

  • Araneae
  • Cannibalism
  • Latrodectus hesperus
  • Mark-release-recapture
  • Marking technique
  • Spider
  • Theridiidae

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Insect Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Adverse effects of fluorescent dust marking on the behavior of western black widow spiderlings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this