Advancing alternative analysis

Integration of decision science

Timothy F. Malloy, Virginia M. Zaunbrecher, Christina M. Batteate, Ann Blake, William F. Carroll, Charles J. Corbett, Steffen Foss Hansen, Robert J. Lempert, Igor Linkov, Roger McFadden, Kelly D. Moran, Elsa Olivetti, Nancy K. Ostrom, Michelle Romero, Julie M. Schoenung, Thomas Seager, Peter Sinsheimer, Kristina A. Thayer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decision analysis—a systematic approach to solving complex problems—offers tools and frameworks to support decision making that are increasingly being applied to environmental challenges. Alternatives analysis is a method used in regulation and product design to identify, compare, and evaluate the safety and viability of potential substitutes for hazardous chemicals. OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether decision science may assist the alternatives analysis decision maker in comparing alternatives across a range of metrics. METHODS: A workshop was convened that included representatives from government, academia, business, and civil society and included experts in toxicology, decision science, alternatives assessment, engineering, and law and policy. Participants were divided into two groups and were prompted with targeted questions. Throughout the workshop, the groups periodically came together in plenary sessions to reflect on other groups’ findings. RESULTS: We concluded that the further incorporation of decision science into alternatives analysis would advance the ability of companies and regulators to select alternatives to harmful ingredients and would also advance the science of decision analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We advance four recommendations: a) engaging the systematic development and evaluation of decision approaches and tools; b) using case studies to advance the integration of decision analysis into alternatives analysis; c) supporting transdisciplinary research; and d) supporting education and outreach efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number066001
JournalEnvironmental Health Perspectives
Volume125
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Decision Support Techniques
Education
Hazardous Substances
Aptitude
Toxicology
Decision Making
Safety
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Malloy, T. F., Zaunbrecher, V. M., Batteate, C. M., Blake, A., Carroll, W. F., Corbett, C. J., ... Thayer, K. A. (2017). Advancing alternative analysis: Integration of decision science. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(6), [066001]. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP483

Advancing alternative analysis : Integration of decision science. / Malloy, Timothy F.; Zaunbrecher, Virginia M.; Batteate, Christina M.; Blake, Ann; Carroll, William F.; Corbett, Charles J.; Hansen, Steffen Foss; Lempert, Robert J.; Linkov, Igor; McFadden, Roger; Moran, Kelly D.; Olivetti, Elsa; Ostrom, Nancy K.; Romero, Michelle; Schoenung, Julie M.; Seager, Thomas; Sinsheimer, Peter; Thayer, Kristina A.

In: Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 125, No. 6, 066001, 01.06.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Malloy, TF, Zaunbrecher, VM, Batteate, CM, Blake, A, Carroll, WF, Corbett, CJ, Hansen, SF, Lempert, RJ, Linkov, I, McFadden, R, Moran, KD, Olivetti, E, Ostrom, NK, Romero, M, Schoenung, JM, Seager, T, Sinsheimer, P & Thayer, KA 2017, 'Advancing alternative analysis: Integration of decision science', Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 125, no. 6, 066001. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP483
Malloy TF, Zaunbrecher VM, Batteate CM, Blake A, Carroll WF, Corbett CJ et al. Advancing alternative analysis: Integration of decision science. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2017 Jun 1;125(6). 066001. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP483
Malloy, Timothy F. ; Zaunbrecher, Virginia M. ; Batteate, Christina M. ; Blake, Ann ; Carroll, William F. ; Corbett, Charles J. ; Hansen, Steffen Foss ; Lempert, Robert J. ; Linkov, Igor ; McFadden, Roger ; Moran, Kelly D. ; Olivetti, Elsa ; Ostrom, Nancy K. ; Romero, Michelle ; Schoenung, Julie M. ; Seager, Thomas ; Sinsheimer, Peter ; Thayer, Kristina A. / Advancing alternative analysis : Integration of decision science. In: Environmental Health Perspectives. 2017 ; Vol. 125, No. 6.
@article{1492d7c9160845789a41031b7583de3d,
title = "Advancing alternative analysis: Integration of decision science",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Decision analysis—a systematic approach to solving complex problems—offers tools and frameworks to support decision making that are increasingly being applied to environmental challenges. Alternatives analysis is a method used in regulation and product design to identify, compare, and evaluate the safety and viability of potential substitutes for hazardous chemicals. OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether decision science may assist the alternatives analysis decision maker in comparing alternatives across a range of metrics. METHODS: A workshop was convened that included representatives from government, academia, business, and civil society and included experts in toxicology, decision science, alternatives assessment, engineering, and law and policy. Participants were divided into two groups and were prompted with targeted questions. Throughout the workshop, the groups periodically came together in plenary sessions to reflect on other groups’ findings. RESULTS: We concluded that the further incorporation of decision science into alternatives analysis would advance the ability of companies and regulators to select alternatives to harmful ingredients and would also advance the science of decision analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We advance four recommendations: a) engaging the systematic development and evaluation of decision approaches and tools; b) using case studies to advance the integration of decision analysis into alternatives analysis; c) supporting transdisciplinary research; and d) supporting education and outreach efforts.",
author = "Malloy, {Timothy F.} and Zaunbrecher, {Virginia M.} and Batteate, {Christina M.} and Ann Blake and Carroll, {William F.} and Corbett, {Charles J.} and Hansen, {Steffen Foss} and Lempert, {Robert J.} and Igor Linkov and Roger McFadden and Moran, {Kelly D.} and Elsa Olivetti and Ostrom, {Nancy K.} and Michelle Romero and Schoenung, {Julie M.} and Thomas Seager and Peter Sinsheimer and Thayer, {Kristina A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1289/EHP483",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
journal = "Environmental Health Perspectives",
issn = "0091-6765",
publisher = "Public Health Services, US Dept of Health and Human Services",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advancing alternative analysis

T2 - Integration of decision science

AU - Malloy, Timothy F.

AU - Zaunbrecher, Virginia M.

AU - Batteate, Christina M.

AU - Blake, Ann

AU - Carroll, William F.

AU - Corbett, Charles J.

AU - Hansen, Steffen Foss

AU - Lempert, Robert J.

AU - Linkov, Igor

AU - McFadden, Roger

AU - Moran, Kelly D.

AU - Olivetti, Elsa

AU - Ostrom, Nancy K.

AU - Romero, Michelle

AU - Schoenung, Julie M.

AU - Seager, Thomas

AU - Sinsheimer, Peter

AU - Thayer, Kristina A.

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Decision analysis—a systematic approach to solving complex problems—offers tools and frameworks to support decision making that are increasingly being applied to environmental challenges. Alternatives analysis is a method used in regulation and product design to identify, compare, and evaluate the safety and viability of potential substitutes for hazardous chemicals. OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether decision science may assist the alternatives analysis decision maker in comparing alternatives across a range of metrics. METHODS: A workshop was convened that included representatives from government, academia, business, and civil society and included experts in toxicology, decision science, alternatives assessment, engineering, and law and policy. Participants were divided into two groups and were prompted with targeted questions. Throughout the workshop, the groups periodically came together in plenary sessions to reflect on other groups’ findings. RESULTS: We concluded that the further incorporation of decision science into alternatives analysis would advance the ability of companies and regulators to select alternatives to harmful ingredients and would also advance the science of decision analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We advance four recommendations: a) engaging the systematic development and evaluation of decision approaches and tools; b) using case studies to advance the integration of decision analysis into alternatives analysis; c) supporting transdisciplinary research; and d) supporting education and outreach efforts.

AB - BACKGROUND: Decision analysis—a systematic approach to solving complex problems—offers tools and frameworks to support decision making that are increasingly being applied to environmental challenges. Alternatives analysis is a method used in regulation and product design to identify, compare, and evaluate the safety and viability of potential substitutes for hazardous chemicals. OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether decision science may assist the alternatives analysis decision maker in comparing alternatives across a range of metrics. METHODS: A workshop was convened that included representatives from government, academia, business, and civil society and included experts in toxicology, decision science, alternatives assessment, engineering, and law and policy. Participants were divided into two groups and were prompted with targeted questions. Throughout the workshop, the groups periodically came together in plenary sessions to reflect on other groups’ findings. RESULTS: We concluded that the further incorporation of decision science into alternatives analysis would advance the ability of companies and regulators to select alternatives to harmful ingredients and would also advance the science of decision analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We advance four recommendations: a) engaging the systematic development and evaluation of decision approaches and tools; b) using case studies to advance the integration of decision analysis into alternatives analysis; c) supporting transdisciplinary research; and d) supporting education and outreach efforts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031707124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031707124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1289/EHP483

DO - 10.1289/EHP483

M3 - Review article

VL - 125

JO - Environmental Health Perspectives

JF - Environmental Health Perspectives

SN - 0091-6765

IS - 6

M1 - 066001

ER -