Advances in in situ air sparging/biosparging

Paul C. Johnson, Richard L. Johnson, Cristin L. Bruce, Andrea Leeson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In situ air sparging (IAS) is a technology commonly used for treatment of submerged source zones and dissolved groundwater plumes. The acceptance of IAS by regulatory agencies, environmental consultants, and industry is remarkable considering the degree of skepticism initially surrounding the technology in the early 1990s. Much has been learned and reported in the literature since that time, but it appears that practice has changed little. In particular, conventional pilot testing, design, and operation practices reflect a lack of appreciation of the complex phenomena governing IAS performance and the unforgiving nature of this technology. Many systems are poorly monitored and likely to be inefficient or ineffective. Key lessons-learned since the early 1990s are reviewed and their implications for practice are discussed here. Of particular importance are issues related to: (a) the understanding of air flow distributions and the effects of geology and injection flowrate, (b) the need to characterize air flow distributions at the pilot- and field-scale, (c) how changes in operating conditions (e.g., pulsing) can affect performance improvements and reduce equipment costs, and (d) how conventional monitoring approaches are incapable of assessing if systems are performing as designed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-266
Number of pages16
JournalBioremediation Journal
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

air sparging
airflow
plume
geology
groundwater
industry
monitoring
cost
in situ
distribution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Johnson, P. C., Johnson, R. L., Bruce, C. L., & Leeson, A. (2001). Advances in in situ air sparging/biosparging. Bioremediation Journal, 5(4), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/20018891079311

Advances in in situ air sparging/biosparging. / Johnson, Paul C.; Johnson, Richard L.; Bruce, Cristin L.; Leeson, Andrea.

In: Bioremediation Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2001, p. 251-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnson, PC, Johnson, RL, Bruce, CL & Leeson, A 2001, 'Advances in in situ air sparging/biosparging', Bioremediation Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/20018891079311
Johnson, Paul C. ; Johnson, Richard L. ; Bruce, Cristin L. ; Leeson, Andrea. / Advances in in situ air sparging/biosparging. In: Bioremediation Journal. 2001 ; Vol. 5, No. 4. pp. 251-266.
@article{4a7c78e450744dda91ab0f400331ecff,
title = "Advances in in situ air sparging/biosparging",
abstract = "In situ air sparging (IAS) is a technology commonly used for treatment of submerged source zones and dissolved groundwater plumes. The acceptance of IAS by regulatory agencies, environmental consultants, and industry is remarkable considering the degree of skepticism initially surrounding the technology in the early 1990s. Much has been learned and reported in the literature since that time, but it appears that practice has changed little. In particular, conventional pilot testing, design, and operation practices reflect a lack of appreciation of the complex phenomena governing IAS performance and the unforgiving nature of this technology. Many systems are poorly monitored and likely to be inefficient or ineffective. Key lessons-learned since the early 1990s are reviewed and their implications for practice are discussed here. Of particular importance are issues related to: (a) the understanding of air flow distributions and the effects of geology and injection flowrate, (b) the need to characterize air flow distributions at the pilot- and field-scale, (c) how changes in operating conditions (e.g., pulsing) can affect performance improvements and reduce equipment costs, and (d) how conventional monitoring approaches are incapable of assessing if systems are performing as designed.",
author = "Johnson, {Paul C.} and Johnson, {Richard L.} and Bruce, {Cristin L.} and Andrea Leeson",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1080/20018891079311",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "251--266",
journal = "Bioremediation Journal",
issn = "1088-9868",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advances in in situ air sparging/biosparging

AU - Johnson, Paul C.

AU - Johnson, Richard L.

AU - Bruce, Cristin L.

AU - Leeson, Andrea

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - In situ air sparging (IAS) is a technology commonly used for treatment of submerged source zones and dissolved groundwater plumes. The acceptance of IAS by regulatory agencies, environmental consultants, and industry is remarkable considering the degree of skepticism initially surrounding the technology in the early 1990s. Much has been learned and reported in the literature since that time, but it appears that practice has changed little. In particular, conventional pilot testing, design, and operation practices reflect a lack of appreciation of the complex phenomena governing IAS performance and the unforgiving nature of this technology. Many systems are poorly monitored and likely to be inefficient or ineffective. Key lessons-learned since the early 1990s are reviewed and their implications for practice are discussed here. Of particular importance are issues related to: (a) the understanding of air flow distributions and the effects of geology and injection flowrate, (b) the need to characterize air flow distributions at the pilot- and field-scale, (c) how changes in operating conditions (e.g., pulsing) can affect performance improvements and reduce equipment costs, and (d) how conventional monitoring approaches are incapable of assessing if systems are performing as designed.

AB - In situ air sparging (IAS) is a technology commonly used for treatment of submerged source zones and dissolved groundwater plumes. The acceptance of IAS by regulatory agencies, environmental consultants, and industry is remarkable considering the degree of skepticism initially surrounding the technology in the early 1990s. Much has been learned and reported in the literature since that time, but it appears that practice has changed little. In particular, conventional pilot testing, design, and operation practices reflect a lack of appreciation of the complex phenomena governing IAS performance and the unforgiving nature of this technology. Many systems are poorly monitored and likely to be inefficient or ineffective. Key lessons-learned since the early 1990s are reviewed and their implications for practice are discussed here. Of particular importance are issues related to: (a) the understanding of air flow distributions and the effects of geology and injection flowrate, (b) the need to characterize air flow distributions at the pilot- and field-scale, (c) how changes in operating conditions (e.g., pulsing) can affect performance improvements and reduce equipment costs, and (d) how conventional monitoring approaches are incapable of assessing if systems are performing as designed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035718653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035718653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/20018891079311

DO - 10.1080/20018891079311

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035718653

VL - 5

SP - 251

EP - 266

JO - Bioremediation Journal

JF - Bioremediation Journal

SN - 1088-9868

IS - 4

ER -