Adoption of innovative and evidence-based practices for children and adolescents in state-supported mental health clinics: A qualitative study

Lawrence A. Palinkas, Mee Young Um, Chung Hyeon Jeong, Ka Ho Brian Chor, Serene Olin, Sarah M. Horwitz, Kimberly E. Hoagwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study examined how mental health clinic administrators decided whether or not to adopt evidence-based and other innovative practices by exploring their views of implementation barriers and facilitators and operation of these views in assessment of implementation costs and benefits. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 75 agency chief executive officers and program directors of 34 New York State-licensed mental health clinics serving children and adolescents. Results: Three interconnected themes relating to barriers and facilitators were identified, namely costs and benefits associated with adoption, capacity for adoption, and acceptability of new practices. The highest percentage of participants (86.7%) mentioned costs as a barrier, followed by limited capacity (55.9%) and lack of acceptability (52.9%). The highest percentage (82.3%) of participants identified available capacity as a facilitator, followed by acceptability (41.2%) and benefits or limited costs (24.0%). Assessment of costs and benefits exhibited several principles of behavioural economics, including loss aversion, temporal discounting use of heuristics, sensitivity to monetary incentives, decision fatigue, framing, and environmental influences. Conclusions: The results point to opportunities for using agency leader models to develop strategies to facilitate implementation of evidence-based and innovative practices for children and adolescents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number27
JournalHealth Research Policy and Systems
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 29 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Mental Health
Behavioral Economics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Administrative Personnel
Fatigue
Motivation
Interviews

Keywords

  • Adoption
  • Child and adolescent mental health
  • Evidence-based treatments and practices
  • Innovation
  • Mixed methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Adoption of innovative and evidence-based practices for children and adolescents in state-supported mental health clinics : A qualitative study. / Palinkas, Lawrence A.; Um, Mee Young; Jeong, Chung Hyeon; Chor, Ka Ho Brian; Olin, Serene; Horwitz, Sarah M.; Hoagwood, Kimberly E.

In: Health Research Policy and Systems, Vol. 15, No. 1, 27, 29.03.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Palinkas, Lawrence A. ; Um, Mee Young ; Jeong, Chung Hyeon ; Chor, Ka Ho Brian ; Olin, Serene ; Horwitz, Sarah M. ; Hoagwood, Kimberly E. / Adoption of innovative and evidence-based practices for children and adolescents in state-supported mental health clinics : A qualitative study. In: Health Research Policy and Systems. 2017 ; Vol. 15, No. 1.
@article{518fabe307d94f01904fc16417cec76e,
title = "Adoption of innovative and evidence-based practices for children and adolescents in state-supported mental health clinics: A qualitative study",
abstract = "Background: This study examined how mental health clinic administrators decided whether or not to adopt evidence-based and other innovative practices by exploring their views of implementation barriers and facilitators and operation of these views in assessment of implementation costs and benefits. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 75 agency chief executive officers and program directors of 34 New York State-licensed mental health clinics serving children and adolescents. Results: Three interconnected themes relating to barriers and facilitators were identified, namely costs and benefits associated with adoption, capacity for adoption, and acceptability of new practices. The highest percentage of participants (86.7{\%}) mentioned costs as a barrier, followed by limited capacity (55.9{\%}) and lack of acceptability (52.9{\%}). The highest percentage (82.3{\%}) of participants identified available capacity as a facilitator, followed by acceptability (41.2{\%}) and benefits or limited costs (24.0{\%}). Assessment of costs and benefits exhibited several principles of behavioural economics, including loss aversion, temporal discounting use of heuristics, sensitivity to monetary incentives, decision fatigue, framing, and environmental influences. Conclusions: The results point to opportunities for using agency leader models to develop strategies to facilitate implementation of evidence-based and innovative practices for children and adolescents.",
keywords = "Adoption, Child and adolescent mental health, Evidence-based treatments and practices, Innovation, Mixed methods",
author = "Palinkas, {Lawrence A.} and Um, {Mee Young} and Jeong, {Chung Hyeon} and Chor, {Ka Ho Brian} and Serene Olin and Horwitz, {Sarah M.} and Hoagwood, {Kimberly E.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1186/s12961-017-0190-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
journal = "Health Research Policy and Systems",
issn = "1478-4505",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adoption of innovative and evidence-based practices for children and adolescents in state-supported mental health clinics

T2 - A qualitative study

AU - Palinkas, Lawrence A.

AU - Um, Mee Young

AU - Jeong, Chung Hyeon

AU - Chor, Ka Ho Brian

AU - Olin, Serene

AU - Horwitz, Sarah M.

AU - Hoagwood, Kimberly E.

PY - 2017/3/29

Y1 - 2017/3/29

N2 - Background: This study examined how mental health clinic administrators decided whether or not to adopt evidence-based and other innovative practices by exploring their views of implementation barriers and facilitators and operation of these views in assessment of implementation costs and benefits. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 75 agency chief executive officers and program directors of 34 New York State-licensed mental health clinics serving children and adolescents. Results: Three interconnected themes relating to barriers and facilitators were identified, namely costs and benefits associated with adoption, capacity for adoption, and acceptability of new practices. The highest percentage of participants (86.7%) mentioned costs as a barrier, followed by limited capacity (55.9%) and lack of acceptability (52.9%). The highest percentage (82.3%) of participants identified available capacity as a facilitator, followed by acceptability (41.2%) and benefits or limited costs (24.0%). Assessment of costs and benefits exhibited several principles of behavioural economics, including loss aversion, temporal discounting use of heuristics, sensitivity to monetary incentives, decision fatigue, framing, and environmental influences. Conclusions: The results point to opportunities for using agency leader models to develop strategies to facilitate implementation of evidence-based and innovative practices for children and adolescents.

AB - Background: This study examined how mental health clinic administrators decided whether or not to adopt evidence-based and other innovative practices by exploring their views of implementation barriers and facilitators and operation of these views in assessment of implementation costs and benefits. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 75 agency chief executive officers and program directors of 34 New York State-licensed mental health clinics serving children and adolescents. Results: Three interconnected themes relating to barriers and facilitators were identified, namely costs and benefits associated with adoption, capacity for adoption, and acceptability of new practices. The highest percentage of participants (86.7%) mentioned costs as a barrier, followed by limited capacity (55.9%) and lack of acceptability (52.9%). The highest percentage (82.3%) of participants identified available capacity as a facilitator, followed by acceptability (41.2%) and benefits or limited costs (24.0%). Assessment of costs and benefits exhibited several principles of behavioural economics, including loss aversion, temporal discounting use of heuristics, sensitivity to monetary incentives, decision fatigue, framing, and environmental influences. Conclusions: The results point to opportunities for using agency leader models to develop strategies to facilitate implementation of evidence-based and innovative practices for children and adolescents.

KW - Adoption

KW - Child and adolescent mental health

KW - Evidence-based treatments and practices

KW - Innovation

KW - Mixed methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016449481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016449481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12961-017-0190-z

DO - 10.1186/s12961-017-0190-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 28356145

AN - SCOPUS:85016449481

VL - 15

JO - Health Research Policy and Systems

JF - Health Research Policy and Systems

SN - 1478-4505

IS - 1

M1 - 27

ER -