Adolescents' decisions about verbal and physical aggression an application of the theory of reasoned action

Anthony J. Roberto, Gary Meyer, Franklin J. Boster, Heather L. Roberto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

This investigation examines the ability of the theory of reasoned action (TRA) to explain and predict adolescents' verbal (i.e., insulting) and physical (i.e., fighting) aggression, as well as behaviors that encourage aggression such as watching a fight or telling others about a fight that is going to happen. Subjects were 488 seventh-grade boys and girls enrolled in 2 public junior high schools in a large Midwestern U.S. city. Subjects completed a survey assessing components of the TRA as they related to the 4 behaviors under investigation. Consistent with the TRA, analysis revealed that attitudes and subjective norms predicted behavioral intent, and intent predicted behavior, for watching a fight, spreading rumors about a fight, and insulting. For fighting, however, attitudes, but not subjective norms, predicted behavioral intent, and intent predicted behavior. Implications for the TRA as well as for the development of youth violence prevention and intervention programs are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)135-147
Number of pages13
JournalHuman Communication Research
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Anthropology
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Adolescents' decisions about verbal and physical aggression an application of the theory of reasoned action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this