Adapting human rights

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Governmental leaders, scholars, and activists have advocated for human rights to food, water, education, health care, and energy. Such rights, also called positive rights, place an affirmative duty upon the state to provide a minimum quantity and quality of these goods and services to all citizens. But food, education, water, and health care are so different–in how they are produced, consumed, and financed–that the implementation of a positive right must be adapted to the distinctive characteristics of the good or service it guarantees. The primary aims of this adaptive implementation are transparency, enforceability and sustainability in the provision of positive rights. Only by adapting a positive right to its policy environment can such a right function as a viable means of protecting disadvantaged members of society. This article uses the example of positive rights to public utilities, such as water and energy, to illustrate adaptive implementation of positive rights. In doing so, this article explains why and how a positive right must be adapted to the unique policy environment of a given public utility.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1-51
    Number of pages51
    JournalDuke Environmental Law and Policy Forum
    Volume26
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    human rights
    public utilities
    water
    health care
    food
    energy
    transparency
    education
    guarantee
    sustainability
    leader
    citizen
    rights
    public utility
    policy

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Geography, Planning and Development
    • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
    • Law

    Cite this

    Adapting human rights. / Larson, Rhett.

    In: Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2015, p. 1-51.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{8d9e5386d6a14b04941df85b2ef7a2b4,
    title = "Adapting human rights",
    abstract = "Governmental leaders, scholars, and activists have advocated for human rights to food, water, education, health care, and energy. Such rights, also called positive rights, place an affirmative duty upon the state to provide a minimum quantity and quality of these goods and services to all citizens. But food, education, water, and health care are so different–in how they are produced, consumed, and financed–that the implementation of a positive right must be adapted to the distinctive characteristics of the good or service it guarantees. The primary aims of this adaptive implementation are transparency, enforceability and sustainability in the provision of positive rights. Only by adapting a positive right to its policy environment can such a right function as a viable means of protecting disadvantaged members of society. This article uses the example of positive rights to public utilities, such as water and energy, to illustrate adaptive implementation of positive rights. In doing so, this article explains why and how a positive right must be adapted to the unique policy environment of a given public utility.",
    author = "Rhett Larson",
    year = "2015",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "26",
    pages = "1--51",
    journal = "Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum",
    issn = "1064-3958",
    publisher = "Duke University School of Law",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Adapting human rights

    AU - Larson, Rhett

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Governmental leaders, scholars, and activists have advocated for human rights to food, water, education, health care, and energy. Such rights, also called positive rights, place an affirmative duty upon the state to provide a minimum quantity and quality of these goods and services to all citizens. But food, education, water, and health care are so different–in how they are produced, consumed, and financed–that the implementation of a positive right must be adapted to the distinctive characteristics of the good or service it guarantees. The primary aims of this adaptive implementation are transparency, enforceability and sustainability in the provision of positive rights. Only by adapting a positive right to its policy environment can such a right function as a viable means of protecting disadvantaged members of society. This article uses the example of positive rights to public utilities, such as water and energy, to illustrate adaptive implementation of positive rights. In doing so, this article explains why and how a positive right must be adapted to the unique policy environment of a given public utility.

    AB - Governmental leaders, scholars, and activists have advocated for human rights to food, water, education, health care, and energy. Such rights, also called positive rights, place an affirmative duty upon the state to provide a minimum quantity and quality of these goods and services to all citizens. But food, education, water, and health care are so different–in how they are produced, consumed, and financed–that the implementation of a positive right must be adapted to the distinctive characteristics of the good or service it guarantees. The primary aims of this adaptive implementation are transparency, enforceability and sustainability in the provision of positive rights. Only by adapting a positive right to its policy environment can such a right function as a viable means of protecting disadvantaged members of society. This article uses the example of positive rights to public utilities, such as water and energy, to illustrate adaptive implementation of positive rights. In doing so, this article explains why and how a positive right must be adapted to the unique policy environment of a given public utility.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959330462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959330462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84959330462

    VL - 26

    SP - 1

    EP - 51

    JO - Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum

    JF - Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum

    SN - 1064-3958

    IS - 1

    ER -