Activism and Radicalism in Prison

Measurement and Correlates in a Large Sample of Inmates in Texas

Scott Decker, David C. Pyrooz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There is considerable speculation that prison plays a role in radicalization. Many individuals involved in acts of political extremism have spent time in prison, adding credibility to such claims. Despite these assertions, there is little empirical evidence regarding the prison-radicalization link because access to prisons is challenging and there are few valid scales of extremism. Studies that do examine a potential link have small sample sizes or select on extremist case studies. The current study draws on interviews conducted with 802 male prison inmates in Texas the week before their release to the community. Inmates were administered the Activism and Radicalism Intention Scale, one of the few validated scales in the extremism literature. A series of structural equation models revealed several important findings. First, we found that the psychometric properties of the modified two factor model of activism and radicalism intentions were largely acceptable among prison inmates, including subgroupings of Latino, white, black, and gang and non-gang-involved inmates. Second, our findings revealed that there was more activism than radicalism intentions among prison inmates, although levels of both were comparable to non-institutional populations. Activism and radicalism intentions were positively related, although this correlation was weaker than in prior studies. Activism should not be substituted for radicalism. Third, our exploratory analysis of concurrent validity identified few multivariate correlates. Group identification—namely, racial and religious groups—was related to both scales, but in opposite directions. Age was negatively, while street-to-prison gang importation was positively, related to radicalism intention. We outline the implications of these findings for research, policy, and practice on activism, radicalization, and prison.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-29
Number of pages29
JournalJustice Quarterly
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 10 2018

Fingerprint

Prisons
radicalism
correctional institution
radicalization
Structural Models
research policy
research practice
speculation
structural model
Hispanic Americans
Psychometrics
Sample Size
psychometrics
credibility
Interviews
interview

Keywords

  • activism
  • LoneStar Project
  • prison
  • radicalism
  • Texas

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Activism and Radicalism in Prison : Measurement and Correlates in a Large Sample of Inmates in Texas. / Decker, Scott; Pyrooz, David C.

In: Justice Quarterly, 10.05.2018, p. 1-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3e259129ef0e4ce4bf657c141e227666,
title = "Activism and Radicalism in Prison: Measurement and Correlates in a Large Sample of Inmates in Texas",
abstract = "There is considerable speculation that prison plays a role in radicalization. Many individuals involved in acts of political extremism have spent time in prison, adding credibility to such claims. Despite these assertions, there is little empirical evidence regarding the prison-radicalization link because access to prisons is challenging and there are few valid scales of extremism. Studies that do examine a potential link have small sample sizes or select on extremist case studies. The current study draws on interviews conducted with 802 male prison inmates in Texas the week before their release to the community. Inmates were administered the Activism and Radicalism Intention Scale, one of the few validated scales in the extremism literature. A series of structural equation models revealed several important findings. First, we found that the psychometric properties of the modified two factor model of activism and radicalism intentions were largely acceptable among prison inmates, including subgroupings of Latino, white, black, and gang and non-gang-involved inmates. Second, our findings revealed that there was more activism than radicalism intentions among prison inmates, although levels of both were comparable to non-institutional populations. Activism and radicalism intentions were positively related, although this correlation was weaker than in prior studies. Activism should not be substituted for radicalism. Third, our exploratory analysis of concurrent validity identified few multivariate correlates. Group identification—namely, racial and religious groups—was related to both scales, but in opposite directions. Age was negatively, while street-to-prison gang importation was positively, related to radicalism intention. We outline the implications of these findings for research, policy, and practice on activism, radicalization, and prison.",
keywords = "activism, LoneStar Project, prison, radicalism, Texas",
author = "Scott Decker and Pyrooz, {David C.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1080/07418825.2018.1462396",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--29",
journal = "Justice Quarterly",
issn = "0741-8825",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Activism and Radicalism in Prison

T2 - Measurement and Correlates in a Large Sample of Inmates in Texas

AU - Decker, Scott

AU - Pyrooz, David C.

PY - 2018/5/10

Y1 - 2018/5/10

N2 - There is considerable speculation that prison plays a role in radicalization. Many individuals involved in acts of political extremism have spent time in prison, adding credibility to such claims. Despite these assertions, there is little empirical evidence regarding the prison-radicalization link because access to prisons is challenging and there are few valid scales of extremism. Studies that do examine a potential link have small sample sizes or select on extremist case studies. The current study draws on interviews conducted with 802 male prison inmates in Texas the week before their release to the community. Inmates were administered the Activism and Radicalism Intention Scale, one of the few validated scales in the extremism literature. A series of structural equation models revealed several important findings. First, we found that the psychometric properties of the modified two factor model of activism and radicalism intentions were largely acceptable among prison inmates, including subgroupings of Latino, white, black, and gang and non-gang-involved inmates. Second, our findings revealed that there was more activism than radicalism intentions among prison inmates, although levels of both were comparable to non-institutional populations. Activism and radicalism intentions were positively related, although this correlation was weaker than in prior studies. Activism should not be substituted for radicalism. Third, our exploratory analysis of concurrent validity identified few multivariate correlates. Group identification—namely, racial and religious groups—was related to both scales, but in opposite directions. Age was negatively, while street-to-prison gang importation was positively, related to radicalism intention. We outline the implications of these findings for research, policy, and practice on activism, radicalization, and prison.

AB - There is considerable speculation that prison plays a role in radicalization. Many individuals involved in acts of political extremism have spent time in prison, adding credibility to such claims. Despite these assertions, there is little empirical evidence regarding the prison-radicalization link because access to prisons is challenging and there are few valid scales of extremism. Studies that do examine a potential link have small sample sizes or select on extremist case studies. The current study draws on interviews conducted with 802 male prison inmates in Texas the week before their release to the community. Inmates were administered the Activism and Radicalism Intention Scale, one of the few validated scales in the extremism literature. A series of structural equation models revealed several important findings. First, we found that the psychometric properties of the modified two factor model of activism and radicalism intentions were largely acceptable among prison inmates, including subgroupings of Latino, white, black, and gang and non-gang-involved inmates. Second, our findings revealed that there was more activism than radicalism intentions among prison inmates, although levels of both were comparable to non-institutional populations. Activism and radicalism intentions were positively related, although this correlation was weaker than in prior studies. Activism should not be substituted for radicalism. Third, our exploratory analysis of concurrent validity identified few multivariate correlates. Group identification—namely, racial and religious groups—was related to both scales, but in opposite directions. Age was negatively, while street-to-prison gang importation was positively, related to radicalism intention. We outline the implications of these findings for research, policy, and practice on activism, radicalization, and prison.

KW - activism

KW - LoneStar Project

KW - prison

KW - radicalism

KW - Texas

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046775353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046775353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07418825.2018.1462396

DO - 10.1080/07418825.2018.1462396

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 29

JO - Justice Quarterly

JF - Justice Quarterly

SN - 0741-8825

ER -