Active sampling device for determining pollutants in surface and pore water - The in situ sampler for biphasic water monitoring

Samuel D. Supowit, Isaac B. Roll, Viet D. Dang, Kevin J. Kroll, Nancy D. Denslow, Rolf Halden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

We designed and evaluated an active sampling device, using as analytical targets a family of pesticides purported to contribute to honeybee colony collapse disorder. Simultaneous sampling of bulk water and pore water was accomplished using a low-flow, multi-channel pump to deliver water to an array of solid-phase extraction cartridges. Analytes were separated using either liquid or gas chromatography, and analysis was performed using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Achieved recoveries of fipronil and degradates in water spiked to nominal concentrations of 0.1, 1, and 10 ng/L ranged from 77 ± 12 to 110 ± 18%. Method detection limits (MDLs) were as low as 0.040-0.8 ng/L. Extraction and quantitation of total fiproles at a wastewater-receiving wetland yielded concentrations in surface water and pore water ranging from 9.9 ± 4.6 to 18.1 ± 4.6 ng/L and 9.1 ± 3.0 to 12.6 ± 2.1 ng/L, respectively. Detected concentrations were statistically indistinguishable from those determined by conventional, more laborious techniques (p > 0.2 for the three most abundant fiproles). Aside from offering time-averaged sampling capabilities for two phases simultaneously with picogram-per-liter MDLs, the novel methodology eliminates the need for water and sediment transport via in situ solid phase extraction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number21886
JournalScientific reports
Volume6
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 24 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Active sampling device for determining pollutants in surface and pore water - The in situ sampler for biphasic water monitoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this