Acoustic simulations of combined electric and acoustic hearing (EAS)

Michael Dorman, Anthony J. Spahr, Philipos C. Loizou, Cindy J. Dana, Jennifer S. Schmidt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Our aim was to explore the consequences for speech understanding of leaving a gap in frequency between a region of acoustic hearing and a region stimulated electrically. Our studies were conducted with normal-hearing listeners, using an acoustic simulation of combined electric and acoustic (EAS) stimulation. Design: Simulations of EAS were created by low-pass filtering speech at 0.5 kHz (90 dB octave roll-off) and adding amplitude-modulated sine waves at higher frequencies. The gap in frequency between acoustic and simulated electric hearing was varied over the range 0.5 kHz to 3.2 kHz. Stimuli included sentences in quiet, sentences in noise, and consonants and vowels. Three experiments were conducted with sample sizes of 12 listeners. Results: Scores were highest in conditions that minimized the frequency gap between acoustic and electric stimulation. In quiet, vowels and consonant place of articulation showed the most sensitivity to the frequency gap. In noise, scores in the simulated EAS condition were higher than the sum of the scores from the acoustic-only and simulated electric-only conditions. Conclusions: Our results suggest that both deep and shallow insertions of electrodes could improve the speech understanding abilities of patients with residual hearing to 500 Hz. However, performance levels will be maximized if the gap between acoustic and electric stimulation is minimized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)371-380
Number of pages10
JournalEar and Hearing
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2005

Fingerprint

Acoustics
Hearing
Acoustic Stimulation
Electric Stimulation
Noise
Radio Waves
Aptitude
Sample Size
Electrodes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Dorman, M., Spahr, A. J., Loizou, P. C., Dana, C. J., & Schmidt, J. S. (2005). Acoustic simulations of combined electric and acoustic hearing (EAS). Ear and Hearing, 26(4), 371-380. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200508000-00001

Acoustic simulations of combined electric and acoustic hearing (EAS). / Dorman, Michael; Spahr, Anthony J.; Loizou, Philipos C.; Dana, Cindy J.; Schmidt, Jennifer S.

In: Ear and Hearing, Vol. 26, No. 4, 08.2005, p. 371-380.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dorman, M, Spahr, AJ, Loizou, PC, Dana, CJ & Schmidt, JS 2005, 'Acoustic simulations of combined electric and acoustic hearing (EAS)', Ear and Hearing, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 371-380. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200508000-00001
Dorman, Michael ; Spahr, Anthony J. ; Loizou, Philipos C. ; Dana, Cindy J. ; Schmidt, Jennifer S. / Acoustic simulations of combined electric and acoustic hearing (EAS). In: Ear and Hearing. 2005 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 371-380.
@article{618d949990e54287b6768c63a90bb5e0,
title = "Acoustic simulations of combined electric and acoustic hearing (EAS)",
abstract = "Objective: Our aim was to explore the consequences for speech understanding of leaving a gap in frequency between a region of acoustic hearing and a region stimulated electrically. Our studies were conducted with normal-hearing listeners, using an acoustic simulation of combined electric and acoustic (EAS) stimulation. Design: Simulations of EAS were created by low-pass filtering speech at 0.5 kHz (90 dB octave roll-off) and adding amplitude-modulated sine waves at higher frequencies. The gap in frequency between acoustic and simulated electric hearing was varied over the range 0.5 kHz to 3.2 kHz. Stimuli included sentences in quiet, sentences in noise, and consonants and vowels. Three experiments were conducted with sample sizes of 12 listeners. Results: Scores were highest in conditions that minimized the frequency gap between acoustic and electric stimulation. In quiet, vowels and consonant place of articulation showed the most sensitivity to the frequency gap. In noise, scores in the simulated EAS condition were higher than the sum of the scores from the acoustic-only and simulated electric-only conditions. Conclusions: Our results suggest that both deep and shallow insertions of electrodes could improve the speech understanding abilities of patients with residual hearing to 500 Hz. However, performance levels will be maximized if the gap between acoustic and electric stimulation is minimized.",
author = "Michael Dorman and Spahr, {Anthony J.} and Loizou, {Philipos C.} and Dana, {Cindy J.} and Schmidt, {Jennifer S.}",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1097/00003446-200508000-00001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "371--380",
journal = "Ear and Hearing",
issn = "0196-0202",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acoustic simulations of combined electric and acoustic hearing (EAS)

AU - Dorman, Michael

AU - Spahr, Anthony J.

AU - Loizou, Philipos C.

AU - Dana, Cindy J.

AU - Schmidt, Jennifer S.

PY - 2005/8

Y1 - 2005/8

N2 - Objective: Our aim was to explore the consequences for speech understanding of leaving a gap in frequency between a region of acoustic hearing and a region stimulated electrically. Our studies were conducted with normal-hearing listeners, using an acoustic simulation of combined electric and acoustic (EAS) stimulation. Design: Simulations of EAS were created by low-pass filtering speech at 0.5 kHz (90 dB octave roll-off) and adding amplitude-modulated sine waves at higher frequencies. The gap in frequency between acoustic and simulated electric hearing was varied over the range 0.5 kHz to 3.2 kHz. Stimuli included sentences in quiet, sentences in noise, and consonants and vowels. Three experiments were conducted with sample sizes of 12 listeners. Results: Scores were highest in conditions that minimized the frequency gap between acoustic and electric stimulation. In quiet, vowels and consonant place of articulation showed the most sensitivity to the frequency gap. In noise, scores in the simulated EAS condition were higher than the sum of the scores from the acoustic-only and simulated electric-only conditions. Conclusions: Our results suggest that both deep and shallow insertions of electrodes could improve the speech understanding abilities of patients with residual hearing to 500 Hz. However, performance levels will be maximized if the gap between acoustic and electric stimulation is minimized.

AB - Objective: Our aim was to explore the consequences for speech understanding of leaving a gap in frequency between a region of acoustic hearing and a region stimulated electrically. Our studies were conducted with normal-hearing listeners, using an acoustic simulation of combined electric and acoustic (EAS) stimulation. Design: Simulations of EAS were created by low-pass filtering speech at 0.5 kHz (90 dB octave roll-off) and adding amplitude-modulated sine waves at higher frequencies. The gap in frequency between acoustic and simulated electric hearing was varied over the range 0.5 kHz to 3.2 kHz. Stimuli included sentences in quiet, sentences in noise, and consonants and vowels. Three experiments were conducted with sample sizes of 12 listeners. Results: Scores were highest in conditions that minimized the frequency gap between acoustic and electric stimulation. In quiet, vowels and consonant place of articulation showed the most sensitivity to the frequency gap. In noise, scores in the simulated EAS condition were higher than the sum of the scores from the acoustic-only and simulated electric-only conditions. Conclusions: Our results suggest that both deep and shallow insertions of electrodes could improve the speech understanding abilities of patients with residual hearing to 500 Hz. However, performance levels will be maximized if the gap between acoustic and electric stimulation is minimized.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28844464852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28844464852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00003446-200508000-00001

DO - 10.1097/00003446-200508000-00001

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 371

EP - 380

JO - Ear and Hearing

JF - Ear and Hearing

SN - 0196-0202

IS - 4

ER -