6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Findings in the network literature suggest self-reports are poor indicators of observable communication behavior. As researchers traditionally have studied organizational communication behavior through self-reports, a rather large body of findings is rendered equivocal because it is not known what self-reports actually measure. In this study, the authors conceptualize self-reports of communication as a type of account, and conduct interviews based on Simon's protocol analysis technique with participants in an organizational simulation. Descriptive content analysis of the responses shows that participants use a wide variety of resources to account for their communication with others, and focus these resources on a variety of social units. Loglinear analysis of coded resource-use patterns shows that resource use is significantly idiosyncratic, and that individual differences are partially related to personality and cognitive style traits of the participants. Implications for the use of self-report data for future organizational communication research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-35
Number of pages31
JournalManagement Communication Quarterly
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

communication behavior
communication
Communication
resources
organizational behavior
communication research
content analysis
personality
simulation
Individual differences
Organizational communication
Resources
Self-report
interview
Resource use
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Communication

Cite this

Accounting Resources for Organizational Communication and Individual Differences in Their Use. / Corman, Steven; Krizek, Robert L.

In: Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1993, p. 5-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bbc4dff1d3be4034931b087952be91af,
title = "Accounting Resources for Organizational Communication and Individual Differences in Their Use",
abstract = "Findings in the network literature suggest self-reports are poor indicators of observable communication behavior. As researchers traditionally have studied organizational communication behavior through self-reports, a rather large body of findings is rendered equivocal because it is not known what self-reports actually measure. In this study, the authors conceptualize self-reports of communication as a type of account, and conduct interviews based on Simon's protocol analysis technique with participants in an organizational simulation. Descriptive content analysis of the responses shows that participants use a wide variety of resources to account for their communication with others, and focus these resources on a variety of social units. Loglinear analysis of coded resource-use patterns shows that resource use is significantly idiosyncratic, and that individual differences are partially related to personality and cognitive style traits of the participants. Implications for the use of self-report data for future organizational communication research are discussed.",
author = "Steven Corman and Krizek, {Robert L.}",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1177/0893318993007001002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "5--35",
journal = "Management Communication Quarterly",
issn = "0893-3189",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accounting Resources for Organizational Communication and Individual Differences in Their Use

AU - Corman, Steven

AU - Krizek, Robert L.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Findings in the network literature suggest self-reports are poor indicators of observable communication behavior. As researchers traditionally have studied organizational communication behavior through self-reports, a rather large body of findings is rendered equivocal because it is not known what self-reports actually measure. In this study, the authors conceptualize self-reports of communication as a type of account, and conduct interviews based on Simon's protocol analysis technique with participants in an organizational simulation. Descriptive content analysis of the responses shows that participants use a wide variety of resources to account for their communication with others, and focus these resources on a variety of social units. Loglinear analysis of coded resource-use patterns shows that resource use is significantly idiosyncratic, and that individual differences are partially related to personality and cognitive style traits of the participants. Implications for the use of self-report data for future organizational communication research are discussed.

AB - Findings in the network literature suggest self-reports are poor indicators of observable communication behavior. As researchers traditionally have studied organizational communication behavior through self-reports, a rather large body of findings is rendered equivocal because it is not known what self-reports actually measure. In this study, the authors conceptualize self-reports of communication as a type of account, and conduct interviews based on Simon's protocol analysis technique with participants in an organizational simulation. Descriptive content analysis of the responses shows that participants use a wide variety of resources to account for their communication with others, and focus these resources on a variety of social units. Loglinear analysis of coded resource-use patterns shows that resource use is significantly idiosyncratic, and that individual differences are partially related to personality and cognitive style traits of the participants. Implications for the use of self-report data for future organizational communication research are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965401437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965401437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0893318993007001002

DO - 10.1177/0893318993007001002

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 5

EP - 35

JO - Management Communication Quarterly

JF - Management Communication Quarterly

SN - 0893-3189

IS - 1

ER -