Accounting for standard errors of measurement when modeling change

Kevin J. Grimm, Kimberly Fine, Gabriela Stegmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Modeling within-person change over time and between-person differences in change over time is a primary goal in prevention science. When modeling change in an observed score over time with multilevel or structural equation modeling approaches, each observed score counts toward the estimation of model parameters equally. However, observed scores can differ in terms of their precision—both within and across participants. We propose an approach to weight observed scores by their level of precision, which is estimated as the inverse of their standard error of measurement in the context of item response modeling. Thus, scores with lower standard errors of measurement have greater weight, and scores with higher standard errors of measurement are down weighted. We discuss the weighting approaches and illustrate how to apply this approach with commonly available software. We then compare this approach to modeling change without weighting based on standard errors of measurement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Behavioral Development
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2020

Keywords

  • Growth modeling
  • prevention
  • reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Accounting for standard errors of measurement when modeling change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this