Accountability and Relationship-Definition Among Food Banks Partnerships

Marla A. Parker, Laurie Mook, Chen Yu Kao, Alex Murdock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Food pantries typically operate in a partnership structure where they are primarily supported by a larger food bank. However, the ability to execute that mission through cooperative arrangements greatly depends upon accountability, a key dynamic that ensures partners are fulfilling expectations and key roles. This exploratory study utilizes qualitative interview data (n = 61) from a large food bank network to understand the extent to which a lead agency (i.e., a large food bank) meets expectations of accountability among partners. The interview results demonstrate that the extent to which expectations are met relate to different types of relationships between the lead agency and partner members. Furthermore, the ways in which partners assess the strengths or weaknesses of the food bank’s accountability reveal different types of relationships within the network, namely that of supplier–customer, supporter–customer, and supporter–collaborator.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalVoluntas
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

bank
food
responsibility
qualitative interview
Accountability
Food
ability
interview

Keywords

  • Accountability
  • Collaboration
  • Food banks
  • Network relationships
  • Partnership

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Accountability and Relationship-Definition Among Food Banks Partnerships. / Parker, Marla A.; Mook, Laurie; Kao, Chen Yu; Murdock, Alex.

In: Voluntas, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Parker, Marla A. ; Mook, Laurie ; Kao, Chen Yu ; Murdock, Alex. / Accountability and Relationship-Definition Among Food Banks Partnerships. In: Voluntas. 2019.
@article{2d7de3842a0f4ce085366da90243b47b,
title = "Accountability and Relationship-Definition Among Food Banks Partnerships",
abstract = "Food pantries typically operate in a partnership structure where they are primarily supported by a larger food bank. However, the ability to execute that mission through cooperative arrangements greatly depends upon accountability, a key dynamic that ensures partners are fulfilling expectations and key roles. This exploratory study utilizes qualitative interview data (n = 61) from a large food bank network to understand the extent to which a lead agency (i.e., a large food bank) meets expectations of accountability among partners. The interview results demonstrate that the extent to which expectations are met relate to different types of relationships between the lead agency and partner members. Furthermore, the ways in which partners assess the strengths or weaknesses of the food bank’s accountability reveal different types of relationships within the network, namely that of supplier–customer, supporter–customer, and supporter–collaborator.",
keywords = "Accountability, Collaboration, Food banks, Network relationships, Partnership",
author = "Parker, {Marla A.} and Laurie Mook and Kao, {Chen Yu} and Alex Murdock",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11266-019-00150-3",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Voluntas",
issn = "0957-8765",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accountability and Relationship-Definition Among Food Banks Partnerships

AU - Parker, Marla A.

AU - Mook, Laurie

AU - Kao, Chen Yu

AU - Murdock, Alex

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Food pantries typically operate in a partnership structure where they are primarily supported by a larger food bank. However, the ability to execute that mission through cooperative arrangements greatly depends upon accountability, a key dynamic that ensures partners are fulfilling expectations and key roles. This exploratory study utilizes qualitative interview data (n = 61) from a large food bank network to understand the extent to which a lead agency (i.e., a large food bank) meets expectations of accountability among partners. The interview results demonstrate that the extent to which expectations are met relate to different types of relationships between the lead agency and partner members. Furthermore, the ways in which partners assess the strengths or weaknesses of the food bank’s accountability reveal different types of relationships within the network, namely that of supplier–customer, supporter–customer, and supporter–collaborator.

AB - Food pantries typically operate in a partnership structure where they are primarily supported by a larger food bank. However, the ability to execute that mission through cooperative arrangements greatly depends upon accountability, a key dynamic that ensures partners are fulfilling expectations and key roles. This exploratory study utilizes qualitative interview data (n = 61) from a large food bank network to understand the extent to which a lead agency (i.e., a large food bank) meets expectations of accountability among partners. The interview results demonstrate that the extent to which expectations are met relate to different types of relationships between the lead agency and partner members. Furthermore, the ways in which partners assess the strengths or weaknesses of the food bank’s accountability reveal different types of relationships within the network, namely that of supplier–customer, supporter–customer, and supporter–collaborator.

KW - Accountability

KW - Collaboration

KW - Food banks

KW - Network relationships

KW - Partnership

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073985464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073985464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11266-019-00150-3

DO - 10.1007/s11266-019-00150-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073985464

JO - Voluntas

JF - Voluntas

SN - 0957-8765

ER -