Access to civil justice and race, class, and gender inequality

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

102 Scopus citations


Access to civil justice is a perspective on the experiences that people have with civil justice events, organizations, or institutions. It focuses on who is able or willing to use civil law and law-like processes and institutions (who has access) and with what results (who receives what kinds of justice). This article reviews what we know about access to civil justice and race, social class, and gender inequality. Three classes of mechanisms through which inequality may be reproduced or exacerbated emerge: the unequal distribution of resources and costs, groups' distinct subjective orientations to law or to their experiences, and differential institutionalization of group or individual interests. Evidence reveals that civil justice experiences can be an important engine in reproducing inequalities and deserve greater attention from inequality scholars. However, the inequality-conserving picture in part reflects scholars' past choices about what to study: Much research has focused narrowly on the use of formal legal means to solve problems or advance interests, or it has considered the experience only of relatively resource-poor, lower status, or otherwise less privileged groups. Thus, we often lack the information necessary to compare systematically groups' experiences to each other or the impact of law to that of other means of managing conflicts or repairing harm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAnnual Review of Sociology
EditorsKaren Cook, Douglas Massey
Number of pages20
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameAnnual Review of Sociology
ISSN (Print)0360-0572


  • Alternative dispute resolution
  • Institutions
  • Law
  • Lawyers
  • Procedural justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Access to civil justice and race, class, and gender inequality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this