Acceptability of positive and punitive discipline methods: Comparisons among abusive, potentially abusive, and nonabusive parents

Mary Lou Kelley, Nancy Grace, Stephen Elliott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study compared abusive, potentially abusive, and control group parents' perceptions of commonly used discipline procedures. The clinical samples were obtained from Parents Anonymous (PA) and consisted of both court-referred (abusive) and self-referred (potentially abusive) members. The subjects were presented with case vignettes that described a child with either mild or severe behavior problems and asked to rate four methods of disciplining the child. The discipline methods involved positive reinforcement, timeout, timeout with spanking, and spanking. The findings indicated that (1) overall, the parents generally evaluated positive reinforcement as significantly more acceptable than timeout, timeout with spanking, and spanking; (2) self-referred PA members viewed timeout, timeout with spanking, and spanking as relatively more acceptable than did their demographically similar comparison group; and (3) court-referred PA parents' ratings did not significantly differ from their comparison group, since both groups rated the reinforcement method as significantly more acceptable than the other three discipline methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-226
Number of pages8
JournalChild Abuse and Neglect
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

parents
Parents
reinforcement
Group
rating
Control Groups
Reinforcement (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Child abuse
  • Parent training
  • Treatment acceptability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Acceptability of positive and punitive discipline methods : Comparisons among abusive, potentially abusive, and nonabusive parents. / Kelley, Mary Lou; Grace, Nancy; Elliott, Stephen.

In: Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 14, No. 2, 1990, p. 219-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d79bfedeaf474d94b14afdada8002431,
title = "Acceptability of positive and punitive discipline methods: Comparisons among abusive, potentially abusive, and nonabusive parents",
abstract = "The present study compared abusive, potentially abusive, and control group parents' perceptions of commonly used discipline procedures. The clinical samples were obtained from Parents Anonymous (PA) and consisted of both court-referred (abusive) and self-referred (potentially abusive) members. The subjects were presented with case vignettes that described a child with either mild or severe behavior problems and asked to rate four methods of disciplining the child. The discipline methods involved positive reinforcement, timeout, timeout with spanking, and spanking. The findings indicated that (1) overall, the parents generally evaluated positive reinforcement as significantly more acceptable than timeout, timeout with spanking, and spanking; (2) self-referred PA members viewed timeout, timeout with spanking, and spanking as relatively more acceptable than did their demographically similar comparison group; and (3) court-referred PA parents' ratings did not significantly differ from their comparison group, since both groups rated the reinforcement method as significantly more acceptable than the other three discipline methods.",
keywords = "Child abuse, Parent training, Treatment acceptability",
author = "Kelley, {Mary Lou} and Nancy Grace and Stephen Elliott",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1016/0145-2134(90)90032-O",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "219--226",
journal = "Child Abuse and Neglect",
issn = "0145-2134",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acceptability of positive and punitive discipline methods

T2 - Comparisons among abusive, potentially abusive, and nonabusive parents

AU - Kelley, Mary Lou

AU - Grace, Nancy

AU - Elliott, Stephen

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - The present study compared abusive, potentially abusive, and control group parents' perceptions of commonly used discipline procedures. The clinical samples were obtained from Parents Anonymous (PA) and consisted of both court-referred (abusive) and self-referred (potentially abusive) members. The subjects were presented with case vignettes that described a child with either mild or severe behavior problems and asked to rate four methods of disciplining the child. The discipline methods involved positive reinforcement, timeout, timeout with spanking, and spanking. The findings indicated that (1) overall, the parents generally evaluated positive reinforcement as significantly more acceptable than timeout, timeout with spanking, and spanking; (2) self-referred PA members viewed timeout, timeout with spanking, and spanking as relatively more acceptable than did their demographically similar comparison group; and (3) court-referred PA parents' ratings did not significantly differ from their comparison group, since both groups rated the reinforcement method as significantly more acceptable than the other three discipline methods.

AB - The present study compared abusive, potentially abusive, and control group parents' perceptions of commonly used discipline procedures. The clinical samples were obtained from Parents Anonymous (PA) and consisted of both court-referred (abusive) and self-referred (potentially abusive) members. The subjects were presented with case vignettes that described a child with either mild or severe behavior problems and asked to rate four methods of disciplining the child. The discipline methods involved positive reinforcement, timeout, timeout with spanking, and spanking. The findings indicated that (1) overall, the parents generally evaluated positive reinforcement as significantly more acceptable than timeout, timeout with spanking, and spanking; (2) self-referred PA members viewed timeout, timeout with spanking, and spanking as relatively more acceptable than did their demographically similar comparison group; and (3) court-referred PA parents' ratings did not significantly differ from their comparison group, since both groups rated the reinforcement method as significantly more acceptable than the other three discipline methods.

KW - Child abuse

KW - Parent training

KW - Treatment acceptability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024993237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024993237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0145-2134(90)90032-O

DO - 10.1016/0145-2134(90)90032-O

M3 - Article

C2 - 2340429

AN - SCOPUS:0024993237

VL - 14

SP - 219

EP - 226

JO - Child Abuse and Neglect

JF - Child Abuse and Neglect

SN - 0145-2134

IS - 2

ER -