Acceptability of cognitive-behavioral and behavioral interventions among teachers

Karen Harris, Donna M. Preller, Stephen Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Teachers' decisions regarding acceptability ultimately affect the implementation and thus the efficacy of classroom interventions. While programmatic research on acceptability of behavioral interventions exists, acceptability of cognitive-behavioral techniques among those who would ultimately implement them has not been examined. In the present study 203 practicing teachers evaluated two cognitive-behavioral (self-instructional strategy training and self-monitoring) and two behavioral (token economy and social reinforcement) interventions for a student with either a mild or severe problem. In addition, reliability and factor structure of the intervention Rating Profile-15 (IRP-15) was examined. The IRP-15 was found to be highly reliable and unidimensional. While teachers found all four interventions to be acceptable, at the mild problem level both social reinforcement and self-monitoring were significantly more acceptable than self-instructional strategy training and token economy. Self-instructional strategy training was significantly more acceptable at the severe problem level as compared to the mild problem level, while social reinforcement was rated as significantly more acceptable at the mild problem level as compared with the severe problem level. Directions for further research are noted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)573-587
Number of pages15
JournalCognitive Therapy and Research
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Token Economy
Social Reinforcement
Research
Students

Keywords

  • acceptability
  • cognitive-behavioral interventions
  • social validity
  • strategy instruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Acceptability of cognitive-behavioral and behavioral interventions among teachers. / Harris, Karen; Preller, Donna M.; Graham, Stephen.

In: Cognitive Therapy and Research, Vol. 14, No. 6, 12.1990, p. 573-587.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{01ae375ec35b41ceb0074ed0d642d1e8,
title = "Acceptability of cognitive-behavioral and behavioral interventions among teachers",
abstract = "Teachers' decisions regarding acceptability ultimately affect the implementation and thus the efficacy of classroom interventions. While programmatic research on acceptability of behavioral interventions exists, acceptability of cognitive-behavioral techniques among those who would ultimately implement them has not been examined. In the present study 203 practicing teachers evaluated two cognitive-behavioral (self-instructional strategy training and self-monitoring) and two behavioral (token economy and social reinforcement) interventions for a student with either a mild or severe problem. In addition, reliability and factor structure of the intervention Rating Profile-15 (IRP-15) was examined. The IRP-15 was found to be highly reliable and unidimensional. While teachers found all four interventions to be acceptable, at the mild problem level both social reinforcement and self-monitoring were significantly more acceptable than self-instructional strategy training and token economy. Self-instructional strategy training was significantly more acceptable at the severe problem level as compared to the mild problem level, while social reinforcement was rated as significantly more acceptable at the mild problem level as compared with the severe problem level. Directions for further research are noted.",
keywords = "acceptability, cognitive-behavioral interventions, social validity, strategy instruction",
author = "Karen Harris and Preller, {Donna M.} and Stephen Graham",
year = "1990",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/BF01173365",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "573--587",
journal = "Cognitive Therapy and Research",
issn = "0147-5916",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acceptability of cognitive-behavioral and behavioral interventions among teachers

AU - Harris, Karen

AU - Preller, Donna M.

AU - Graham, Stephen

PY - 1990/12

Y1 - 1990/12

N2 - Teachers' decisions regarding acceptability ultimately affect the implementation and thus the efficacy of classroom interventions. While programmatic research on acceptability of behavioral interventions exists, acceptability of cognitive-behavioral techniques among those who would ultimately implement them has not been examined. In the present study 203 practicing teachers evaluated two cognitive-behavioral (self-instructional strategy training and self-monitoring) and two behavioral (token economy and social reinforcement) interventions for a student with either a mild or severe problem. In addition, reliability and factor structure of the intervention Rating Profile-15 (IRP-15) was examined. The IRP-15 was found to be highly reliable and unidimensional. While teachers found all four interventions to be acceptable, at the mild problem level both social reinforcement and self-monitoring were significantly more acceptable than self-instructional strategy training and token economy. Self-instructional strategy training was significantly more acceptable at the severe problem level as compared to the mild problem level, while social reinforcement was rated as significantly more acceptable at the mild problem level as compared with the severe problem level. Directions for further research are noted.

AB - Teachers' decisions regarding acceptability ultimately affect the implementation and thus the efficacy of classroom interventions. While programmatic research on acceptability of behavioral interventions exists, acceptability of cognitive-behavioral techniques among those who would ultimately implement them has not been examined. In the present study 203 practicing teachers evaluated two cognitive-behavioral (self-instructional strategy training and self-monitoring) and two behavioral (token economy and social reinforcement) interventions for a student with either a mild or severe problem. In addition, reliability and factor structure of the intervention Rating Profile-15 (IRP-15) was examined. The IRP-15 was found to be highly reliable and unidimensional. While teachers found all four interventions to be acceptable, at the mild problem level both social reinforcement and self-monitoring were significantly more acceptable than self-instructional strategy training and token economy. Self-instructional strategy training was significantly more acceptable at the severe problem level as compared to the mild problem level, while social reinforcement was rated as significantly more acceptable at the mild problem level as compared with the severe problem level. Directions for further research are noted.

KW - acceptability

KW - cognitive-behavioral interventions

KW - social validity

KW - strategy instruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025601915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025601915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01173365

DO - 10.1007/BF01173365

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0025601915

VL - 14

SP - 573

EP - 587

JO - Cognitive Therapy and Research

JF - Cognitive Therapy and Research

SN - 0147-5916

IS - 6

ER -