Acceptability of Adaptations for Struggling Writers

Stephen Graham, Karen Harris, Brendan J. Bartlett, Eleni Popadopoulou, Julia Santoro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One hundred twenty-five primary-grade teachers randomly selected from across the United States indicated how frequently they made 20 instructional adaptations for the struggling writers in their classroom. The measure of frequency ranged from never, several times a year, monthly, weekly, several times a week, and daily. Using a 6-point Likert-type scale, they also rated the acceptability of each of the 20 adaptations on five dimensions: suitability, effectiveness, negative effects, time to apply, and implementation know-how. Teachers reported making 13 different adaptations monthly or more often. The most common adaptations were extra encouragement and extra time to complete writing assignments, whereas the least common adaptations involved technology or dictation. Teachers viewed all of the adaptations as acceptable, and their views on acceptability made a unique and statistically significant contribution to predicting reported use of adaptations after variance due to student and other teacher variables was first controlled.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-16
Number of pages12
JournalLearning Disability Quarterly
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

writer
teacher
Students
Technology
know how
classroom
student
time

Keywords

  • adaptations
  • struggling writers
  • writing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Acceptability of Adaptations for Struggling Writers. / Graham, Stephen; Harris, Karen; Bartlett, Brendan J.; Popadopoulou, Eleni; Santoro, Julia.

In: Learning Disability Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 5-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Graham, Stephen ; Harris, Karen ; Bartlett, Brendan J. ; Popadopoulou, Eleni ; Santoro, Julia. / Acceptability of Adaptations for Struggling Writers. In: Learning Disability Quarterly. 2016 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 5-16.
@article{32300be57516473f9b4c2208d06d5666,
title = "Acceptability of Adaptations for Struggling Writers",
abstract = "One hundred twenty-five primary-grade teachers randomly selected from across the United States indicated how frequently they made 20 instructional adaptations for the struggling writers in their classroom. The measure of frequency ranged from never, several times a year, monthly, weekly, several times a week, and daily. Using a 6-point Likert-type scale, they also rated the acceptability of each of the 20 adaptations on five dimensions: suitability, effectiveness, negative effects, time to apply, and implementation know-how. Teachers reported making 13 different adaptations monthly or more often. The most common adaptations were extra encouragement and extra time to complete writing assignments, whereas the least common adaptations involved technology or dictation. Teachers viewed all of the adaptations as acceptable, and their views on acceptability made a unique and statistically significant contribution to predicting reported use of adaptations after variance due to student and other teacher variables was first controlled.",
keywords = "adaptations, struggling writers, writing",
author = "Stephen Graham and Karen Harris and Bartlett, {Brendan J.} and Eleni Popadopoulou and Julia Santoro",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0731948714554038",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "5--16",
journal = "Learning Disability Quarterly",
issn = "0731-9487",
publisher = "Council for Learning Disabilities",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acceptability of Adaptations for Struggling Writers

AU - Graham, Stephen

AU - Harris, Karen

AU - Bartlett, Brendan J.

AU - Popadopoulou, Eleni

AU - Santoro, Julia

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - One hundred twenty-five primary-grade teachers randomly selected from across the United States indicated how frequently they made 20 instructional adaptations for the struggling writers in their classroom. The measure of frequency ranged from never, several times a year, monthly, weekly, several times a week, and daily. Using a 6-point Likert-type scale, they also rated the acceptability of each of the 20 adaptations on five dimensions: suitability, effectiveness, negative effects, time to apply, and implementation know-how. Teachers reported making 13 different adaptations monthly or more often. The most common adaptations were extra encouragement and extra time to complete writing assignments, whereas the least common adaptations involved technology or dictation. Teachers viewed all of the adaptations as acceptable, and their views on acceptability made a unique and statistically significant contribution to predicting reported use of adaptations after variance due to student and other teacher variables was first controlled.

AB - One hundred twenty-five primary-grade teachers randomly selected from across the United States indicated how frequently they made 20 instructional adaptations for the struggling writers in their classroom. The measure of frequency ranged from never, several times a year, monthly, weekly, several times a week, and daily. Using a 6-point Likert-type scale, they also rated the acceptability of each of the 20 adaptations on five dimensions: suitability, effectiveness, negative effects, time to apply, and implementation know-how. Teachers reported making 13 different adaptations monthly or more often. The most common adaptations were extra encouragement and extra time to complete writing assignments, whereas the least common adaptations involved technology or dictation. Teachers viewed all of the adaptations as acceptable, and their views on acceptability made a unique and statistically significant contribution to predicting reported use of adaptations after variance due to student and other teacher variables was first controlled.

KW - adaptations

KW - struggling writers

KW - writing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951864615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951864615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0731948714554038

DO - 10.1177/0731948714554038

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84951864615

VL - 39

SP - 5

EP - 16

JO - Learning Disability Quarterly

JF - Learning Disability Quarterly

SN - 0731-9487

IS - 1

ER -