Acceptability and effectiveness of group contingencies for improving spelling achievement

Timothy L. Turco, Stephen Elliott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This 12-week study of fifth-grade students used a pretest-posttest control group design to assess how varying task structures (individual or group) and incentive structures (interdependent, dependent, or no-incentive) affected three major dependent variables: (a) spelling achievement, (b) peer-nominated social status, and (c) treatment acceptability. The spelling performances of all teams increased significantly from pretreatment to posttreatment on the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised and a curriculum spelling test. No significant increases in weekly spelling achievement, however, were found in any of the treatment teams as a result of either the incentive structure or the task structure. The results of the study indicated that all of the treatment teams, except the dependent individual team, rated their treatment significantly less acceptable at posttreatment than they had at pretreatment. The various incentive structures and task structures did not lead to systematically significant changes in social status ratings based on peer nominations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-37
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of School Psychology
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

contingency
Motivation
incentive
Group
Group Structure
social status
Therapeutics
Curriculum
achievement test
Students
Control Groups
rating
curriculum
performance
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

Acceptability and effectiveness of group contingencies for improving spelling achievement. / Turco, Timothy L.; Elliott, Stephen.

In: Journal of School Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1990, p. 27-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f9a364ee0f4c455a8a379c0802b59673,
title = "Acceptability and effectiveness of group contingencies for improving spelling achievement",
abstract = "This 12-week study of fifth-grade students used a pretest-posttest control group design to assess how varying task structures (individual or group) and incentive structures (interdependent, dependent, or no-incentive) affected three major dependent variables: (a) spelling achievement, (b) peer-nominated social status, and (c) treatment acceptability. The spelling performances of all teams increased significantly from pretreatment to posttreatment on the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised and a curriculum spelling test. No significant increases in weekly spelling achievement, however, were found in any of the treatment teams as a result of either the incentive structure or the task structure. The results of the study indicated that all of the treatment teams, except the dependent individual team, rated their treatment significantly less acceptable at posttreatment than they had at pretreatment. The various incentive structures and task structures did not lead to systematically significant changes in social status ratings based on peer nominations.",
author = "Turco, {Timothy L.} and Stephen Elliott",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1016/0022-4405(90)90034-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "27--37",
journal = "Journal of School Psychology",
issn = "0022-4405",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acceptability and effectiveness of group contingencies for improving spelling achievement

AU - Turco, Timothy L.

AU - Elliott, Stephen

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - This 12-week study of fifth-grade students used a pretest-posttest control group design to assess how varying task structures (individual or group) and incentive structures (interdependent, dependent, or no-incentive) affected three major dependent variables: (a) spelling achievement, (b) peer-nominated social status, and (c) treatment acceptability. The spelling performances of all teams increased significantly from pretreatment to posttreatment on the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised and a curriculum spelling test. No significant increases in weekly spelling achievement, however, were found in any of the treatment teams as a result of either the incentive structure or the task structure. The results of the study indicated that all of the treatment teams, except the dependent individual team, rated their treatment significantly less acceptable at posttreatment than they had at pretreatment. The various incentive structures and task structures did not lead to systematically significant changes in social status ratings based on peer nominations.

AB - This 12-week study of fifth-grade students used a pretest-posttest control group design to assess how varying task structures (individual or group) and incentive structures (interdependent, dependent, or no-incentive) affected three major dependent variables: (a) spelling achievement, (b) peer-nominated social status, and (c) treatment acceptability. The spelling performances of all teams increased significantly from pretreatment to posttreatment on the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised and a curriculum spelling test. No significant increases in weekly spelling achievement, however, were found in any of the treatment teams as a result of either the incentive structure or the task structure. The results of the study indicated that all of the treatment teams, except the dependent individual team, rated their treatment significantly less acceptable at posttreatment than they had at pretreatment. The various incentive structures and task structures did not lead to systematically significant changes in social status ratings based on peer nominations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002302274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002302274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0022-4405(90)90034-5

DO - 10.1016/0022-4405(90)90034-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0002302274

VL - 28

SP - 27

EP - 37

JO - Journal of School Psychology

JF - Journal of School Psychology

SN - 0022-4405

IS - 1

ER -