Absorbing boundary conditions, difference operators, and stability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we present a review of some of the methods currently used for solving the absorbing boundary problem for the two-dimensional scalar wave equation. We show the relationship between the methods of Lindman and Clayton and Engquist. Through this relationship we can derive discretizations of any rational approximation to the one-way wave equation. We prove that, for all the cases considered here, which can be solved in a manner similar to Lindman's approach, the bounds imposed on the Courant number for stability at the boundary are no more severe than the bound 1 √2 required for stability of the interior scheme. These bounds are, however, necessary but not sufficient. We also compare the methods reviewed numerically. It is demonstrated that Lindman's scheme is no better than a sixth-order approximation of Halpern and Trefethen. For low-order approximations, Higdon's one-dimensional equations are satisfactory, but as the order increases the two-dimensional form of the equations, as derived by Halpern and Trefethen, is preferable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)236-251
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Computational Physics
Volume102
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Wave equations
Mathematical operators
Boundary conditions
boundary conditions
operators
wave equations
approximation
scalars

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Absorbing boundary conditions, difference operators, and stability. / Renaut, Rosemary.

In: Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 102, No. 2, 1992, p. 236-251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5d787ba36293497488bc0862cbf5a7c1,
title = "Absorbing boundary conditions, difference operators, and stability",
abstract = "In this paper we present a review of some of the methods currently used for solving the absorbing boundary problem for the two-dimensional scalar wave equation. We show the relationship between the methods of Lindman and Clayton and Engquist. Through this relationship we can derive discretizations of any rational approximation to the one-way wave equation. We prove that, for all the cases considered here, which can be solved in a manner similar to Lindman's approach, the bounds imposed on the Courant number for stability at the boundary are no more severe than the bound 1 √2 required for stability of the interior scheme. These bounds are, however, necessary but not sufficient. We also compare the methods reviewed numerically. It is demonstrated that Lindman's scheme is no better than a sixth-order approximation of Halpern and Trefethen. For low-order approximations, Higdon's one-dimensional equations are satisfactory, but as the order increases the two-dimensional form of the equations, as derived by Halpern and Trefethen, is preferable.",
author = "Rosemary Renaut",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1016/0021-9991(92)90369-A",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "236--251",
journal = "Journal of Computational Physics",
issn = "0021-9991",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Absorbing boundary conditions, difference operators, and stability

AU - Renaut, Rosemary

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - In this paper we present a review of some of the methods currently used for solving the absorbing boundary problem for the two-dimensional scalar wave equation. We show the relationship between the methods of Lindman and Clayton and Engquist. Through this relationship we can derive discretizations of any rational approximation to the one-way wave equation. We prove that, for all the cases considered here, which can be solved in a manner similar to Lindman's approach, the bounds imposed on the Courant number for stability at the boundary are no more severe than the bound 1 √2 required for stability of the interior scheme. These bounds are, however, necessary but not sufficient. We also compare the methods reviewed numerically. It is demonstrated that Lindman's scheme is no better than a sixth-order approximation of Halpern and Trefethen. For low-order approximations, Higdon's one-dimensional equations are satisfactory, but as the order increases the two-dimensional form of the equations, as derived by Halpern and Trefethen, is preferable.

AB - In this paper we present a review of some of the methods currently used for solving the absorbing boundary problem for the two-dimensional scalar wave equation. We show the relationship between the methods of Lindman and Clayton and Engquist. Through this relationship we can derive discretizations of any rational approximation to the one-way wave equation. We prove that, for all the cases considered here, which can be solved in a manner similar to Lindman's approach, the bounds imposed on the Courant number for stability at the boundary are no more severe than the bound 1 √2 required for stability of the interior scheme. These bounds are, however, necessary but not sufficient. We also compare the methods reviewed numerically. It is demonstrated that Lindman's scheme is no better than a sixth-order approximation of Halpern and Trefethen. For low-order approximations, Higdon's one-dimensional equations are satisfactory, but as the order increases the two-dimensional form of the equations, as derived by Halpern and Trefethen, is preferable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001736124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001736124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0021-9991(92)90369-A

DO - 10.1016/0021-9991(92)90369-A

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001736124

VL - 102

SP - 236

EP - 251

JO - Journal of Computational Physics

JF - Journal of Computational Physics

SN - 0021-9991

IS - 2

ER -