A Within-Subject Comparison of Bimodal Hearing, Bilateral Cochlear Implantation, and Bilateral Cochlear Implantation with Bilateral Hearing Preservation: High-Performing Patients

René H. Gifford, Colin L W Driscoll, Timothy J. Davis, Pam Fiebig, Alan Micco, Michael Dorman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To compare speech understanding with bimodal hearing and bilateral cochlear implants (CIs). Study Design Within-subjects, repeated-measures. Methods Speech understanding was assessed in the following conditions: unilateral hearing aid (HA) in the non-implanted ear, unilateral CI, bimodal (CI + HA), and bilateral CI. In addition, three participants had bilateral hearing preservation and were also tested with bilateral CIs and bilateral HAs (BiBi). Setting Tertiary academic CI center. Patients Eight adult sequential bilateral recipients who, despite achieving incredibly high performance with the first CI, self-selected for bilateral cochlear implantation. Intervention(s) Bilateral cochlear implantation. Main Outcome Measure(s) Speech understanding for the adult minimum speech test battery as well as sentences in semidiffuse noise using the R-SPACE system. Results Bilateral CIs afforded significant individual improvement in a complex listening environment even for individuals demonstrating near perfect sentence scores with both the first CI alone as well as the bimodal condition. The 3 BiBi participants demonstrated additional significant benefit over the bilateral CI condition-presumably because of the availability of interaural time difference cues. Conclusions These data suggest that, for noisy environments, adding a second implant can significantly improve speech understanding - even for high-performing unilateral CI with bimodal hearing. In diffuse noise conditions, bilateral acoustic hearing can yield even greater benefits beyond that offered by bilateral implantation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1331-1337
Number of pages7
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Volume36
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 27 2015

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implantation
Cochlear Implants
Hearing
Hearing Aids
Noise
Acoustics
Cues
Ear
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Bilateral cochlear implants
  • Bimodal hearing
  • Electric and acoustic stimulation
  • Hearing preservation
  • Speech recognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

A Within-Subject Comparison of Bimodal Hearing, Bilateral Cochlear Implantation, and Bilateral Cochlear Implantation with Bilateral Hearing Preservation : High-Performing Patients. / Gifford, René H.; Driscoll, Colin L W; Davis, Timothy J.; Fiebig, Pam; Micco, Alan; Dorman, Michael.

In: Otology and Neurotology, Vol. 36, No. 8, 27.09.2015, p. 1331-1337.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gifford, René H. ; Driscoll, Colin L W ; Davis, Timothy J. ; Fiebig, Pam ; Micco, Alan ; Dorman, Michael. / A Within-Subject Comparison of Bimodal Hearing, Bilateral Cochlear Implantation, and Bilateral Cochlear Implantation with Bilateral Hearing Preservation : High-Performing Patients. In: Otology and Neurotology. 2015 ; Vol. 36, No. 8. pp. 1331-1337.
@article{187df3647e444772862e589d62223380,
title = "A Within-Subject Comparison of Bimodal Hearing, Bilateral Cochlear Implantation, and Bilateral Cochlear Implantation with Bilateral Hearing Preservation: High-Performing Patients",
abstract = "Objective To compare speech understanding with bimodal hearing and bilateral cochlear implants (CIs). Study Design Within-subjects, repeated-measures. Methods Speech understanding was assessed in the following conditions: unilateral hearing aid (HA) in the non-implanted ear, unilateral CI, bimodal (CI + HA), and bilateral CI. In addition, three participants had bilateral hearing preservation and were also tested with bilateral CIs and bilateral HAs (BiBi). Setting Tertiary academic CI center. Patients Eight adult sequential bilateral recipients who, despite achieving incredibly high performance with the first CI, self-selected for bilateral cochlear implantation. Intervention(s) Bilateral cochlear implantation. Main Outcome Measure(s) Speech understanding for the adult minimum speech test battery as well as sentences in semidiffuse noise using the R-SPACE system. Results Bilateral CIs afforded significant individual improvement in a complex listening environment even for individuals demonstrating near perfect sentence scores with both the first CI alone as well as the bimodal condition. The 3 BiBi participants demonstrated additional significant benefit over the bilateral CI condition-presumably because of the availability of interaural time difference cues. Conclusions These data suggest that, for noisy environments, adding a second implant can significantly improve speech understanding - even for high-performing unilateral CI with bimodal hearing. In diffuse noise conditions, bilateral acoustic hearing can yield even greater benefits beyond that offered by bilateral implantation.",
keywords = "Bilateral cochlear implants, Bimodal hearing, Electric and acoustic stimulation, Hearing preservation, Speech recognition",
author = "Gifford, {Ren{\'e} H.} and Driscoll, {Colin L W} and Davis, {Timothy J.} and Pam Fiebig and Alan Micco and Michael Dorman",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1097/MAO.0000000000000804",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "1331--1337",
journal = "Otology and Neurotology",
issn = "1531-7129",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Within-Subject Comparison of Bimodal Hearing, Bilateral Cochlear Implantation, and Bilateral Cochlear Implantation with Bilateral Hearing Preservation

T2 - High-Performing Patients

AU - Gifford, René H.

AU - Driscoll, Colin L W

AU - Davis, Timothy J.

AU - Fiebig, Pam

AU - Micco, Alan

AU - Dorman, Michael

PY - 2015/9/27

Y1 - 2015/9/27

N2 - Objective To compare speech understanding with bimodal hearing and bilateral cochlear implants (CIs). Study Design Within-subjects, repeated-measures. Methods Speech understanding was assessed in the following conditions: unilateral hearing aid (HA) in the non-implanted ear, unilateral CI, bimodal (CI + HA), and bilateral CI. In addition, three participants had bilateral hearing preservation and were also tested with bilateral CIs and bilateral HAs (BiBi). Setting Tertiary academic CI center. Patients Eight adult sequential bilateral recipients who, despite achieving incredibly high performance with the first CI, self-selected for bilateral cochlear implantation. Intervention(s) Bilateral cochlear implantation. Main Outcome Measure(s) Speech understanding for the adult minimum speech test battery as well as sentences in semidiffuse noise using the R-SPACE system. Results Bilateral CIs afforded significant individual improvement in a complex listening environment even for individuals demonstrating near perfect sentence scores with both the first CI alone as well as the bimodal condition. The 3 BiBi participants demonstrated additional significant benefit over the bilateral CI condition-presumably because of the availability of interaural time difference cues. Conclusions These data suggest that, for noisy environments, adding a second implant can significantly improve speech understanding - even for high-performing unilateral CI with bimodal hearing. In diffuse noise conditions, bilateral acoustic hearing can yield even greater benefits beyond that offered by bilateral implantation.

AB - Objective To compare speech understanding with bimodal hearing and bilateral cochlear implants (CIs). Study Design Within-subjects, repeated-measures. Methods Speech understanding was assessed in the following conditions: unilateral hearing aid (HA) in the non-implanted ear, unilateral CI, bimodal (CI + HA), and bilateral CI. In addition, three participants had bilateral hearing preservation and were also tested with bilateral CIs and bilateral HAs (BiBi). Setting Tertiary academic CI center. Patients Eight adult sequential bilateral recipients who, despite achieving incredibly high performance with the first CI, self-selected for bilateral cochlear implantation. Intervention(s) Bilateral cochlear implantation. Main Outcome Measure(s) Speech understanding for the adult minimum speech test battery as well as sentences in semidiffuse noise using the R-SPACE system. Results Bilateral CIs afforded significant individual improvement in a complex listening environment even for individuals demonstrating near perfect sentence scores with both the first CI alone as well as the bimodal condition. The 3 BiBi participants demonstrated additional significant benefit over the bilateral CI condition-presumably because of the availability of interaural time difference cues. Conclusions These data suggest that, for noisy environments, adding a second implant can significantly improve speech understanding - even for high-performing unilateral CI with bimodal hearing. In diffuse noise conditions, bilateral acoustic hearing can yield even greater benefits beyond that offered by bilateral implantation.

KW - Bilateral cochlear implants

KW - Bimodal hearing

KW - Electric and acoustic stimulation

KW - Hearing preservation

KW - Speech recognition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940102357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940102357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000804

DO - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000804

M3 - Article

C2 - 26164443

AN - SCOPUS:84940102357

VL - 36

SP - 1331

EP - 1337

JO - Otology and Neurotology

JF - Otology and Neurotology

SN - 1531-7129

IS - 8

ER -