A thermodynamic analysis of the π * and ET(30) polarity scales

Dmitry Matyushov, Roland Schmid, Branka M. Ladanyi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The solvent-induced UV-vis spectral shifts in 4-nitroanisole and pyridinium N-phenoxide betaine-30 dyes utilized in the famous π* and ET(30) polarity scales, respectively, are analyzed by molecular theories in terms of long-range solute-solvent interactions due to induction, dispersion, and dipole-dipole forces. The solvent-induced shift is represented as a sum of the differential solute-solvent internal energy and the differential energy of binding the solvent molecules in the solute vicinity. The aim of the study is 3-fold: (i) to clarify and quantify the relative effects of the three types of interactions, (ii) to elicit the magnitude of the effect of specific forces, and (iii) to evaluate the contribution of the differential solvent binding to the spectral shift. For (i), the dye properties directing the weighting are the size and the differences in both polarizability and dipole moment between ground and excited states. Accordingly, the distinctions π* vs ET(30) derive from the different sizes (4.5 vs 6.4 Å), dramatically different polarizability enhancement upon excitation (6 vs 61 Å3), and opposite changes in the dipole moment (+8.2 vs -8.6 D) of the two dyes. As a key result, the importance of dispersion forces to the spectral shift even in highly polar liquids is emphasized. While the contributions of dispersions and inductions are comparable in the π* scale, inductions are clearly overshadowed by dispersions in the ET(30) values. Both effects reinforce each other in π*, producing the well-known red shift. For the ET(30) scale, the effects due to dispersion and dipolar solvation have opposite signs making the red shift for nonpolar solvents switch to the blue for polar solvents. For (ii), there is overall reasonable agreement between theory and experiment for both dyes, as far as the nonpolar and select solvents are concerned, but there are also discrepant solvent classes. Thus, the predicted ET(30) values for protic solvents are uniformly too low, revealing a decrease in H-bonding interactions of the excited state with lowered dipole moment. Further, the calculated π* values of aromatic and chlorinated solvents are throughout too high, and this is explained by an increase in charge-transfer interactions of the more delocalized excited state. For (iii), the differential solvent binding energies have been extracted from experimental thermochromic data. For strongly polar fluids, the solute-solvent component of the shift overshadows that from the solvent binding energy variation. In nonpolar and weakly polar liquids the two parts are comparable for 4-nitroanisole, but the latter is still small for betaine-30. Experimental and calculated values in the present work parameters for betaine-30 are applied to calculating solvent reorganization energies λs of intramolecular electron transfer. λs is separated into polar activation by the solvent permanent dipoles and nonpolar activation due to induction and dispersion forces. Experimental reorganization energies due to the classical solvent and solute modes are throughout higher than the calculated λs values. The difference depends on solvent polarity and was attributed to the solute donor - acceptor vibrational mode coupled to the solvent polarization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1035-1050
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry B
Volume101
Issue number6
StatePublished - Feb 6 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

polarity
Thermodynamics
thermodynamics
solutes
Betaines
Betaine
betaines
Dipole moment
induction
Coloring Agents
Dyes
dyes
Excited states
shift
dipole moments
dipoles
Binding energy
Dispersions
red shift
excitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

A thermodynamic analysis of the π * and ET(30) polarity scales. / Matyushov, Dmitry; Schmid, Roland; Ladanyi, Branka M.

In: Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Vol. 101, No. 6, 06.02.1997, p. 1035-1050.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Matyushov, Dmitry ; Schmid, Roland ; Ladanyi, Branka M. / A thermodynamic analysis of the π * and ET(30) polarity scales. In: Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 1997 ; Vol. 101, No. 6. pp. 1035-1050.
@article{d4ed3dcb4db645bea463e9743ddc6efd,
title = "A thermodynamic analysis of the π * and ET(30) polarity scales",
abstract = "The solvent-induced UV-vis spectral shifts in 4-nitroanisole and pyridinium N-phenoxide betaine-30 dyes utilized in the famous π* and ET(30) polarity scales, respectively, are analyzed by molecular theories in terms of long-range solute-solvent interactions due to induction, dispersion, and dipole-dipole forces. The solvent-induced shift is represented as a sum of the differential solute-solvent internal energy and the differential energy of binding the solvent molecules in the solute vicinity. The aim of the study is 3-fold: (i) to clarify and quantify the relative effects of the three types of interactions, (ii) to elicit the magnitude of the effect of specific forces, and (iii) to evaluate the contribution of the differential solvent binding to the spectral shift. For (i), the dye properties directing the weighting are the size and the differences in both polarizability and dipole moment between ground and excited states. Accordingly, the distinctions π* vs ET(30) derive from the different sizes (4.5 vs 6.4 {\AA}), dramatically different polarizability enhancement upon excitation (6 vs 61 {\AA}3), and opposite changes in the dipole moment (+8.2 vs -8.6 D) of the two dyes. As a key result, the importance of dispersion forces to the spectral shift even in highly polar liquids is emphasized. While the contributions of dispersions and inductions are comparable in the π* scale, inductions are clearly overshadowed by dispersions in the ET(30) values. Both effects reinforce each other in π*, producing the well-known red shift. For the ET(30) scale, the effects due to dispersion and dipolar solvation have opposite signs making the red shift for nonpolar solvents switch to the blue for polar solvents. For (ii), there is overall reasonable agreement between theory and experiment for both dyes, as far as the nonpolar and select solvents are concerned, but there are also discrepant solvent classes. Thus, the predicted ET(30) values for protic solvents are uniformly too low, revealing a decrease in H-bonding interactions of the excited state with lowered dipole moment. Further, the calculated π* values of aromatic and chlorinated solvents are throughout too high, and this is explained by an increase in charge-transfer interactions of the more delocalized excited state. For (iii), the differential solvent binding energies have been extracted from experimental thermochromic data. For strongly polar fluids, the solute-solvent component of the shift overshadows that from the solvent binding energy variation. In nonpolar and weakly polar liquids the two parts are comparable for 4-nitroanisole, but the latter is still small for betaine-30. Experimental and calculated values in the present work parameters for betaine-30 are applied to calculating solvent reorganization energies λs of intramolecular electron transfer. λs is separated into polar activation by the solvent permanent dipoles and nonpolar activation due to induction and dispersion forces. Experimental reorganization energies due to the classical solvent and solute modes are throughout higher than the calculated λs values. The difference depends on solvent polarity and was attributed to the solute donor - acceptor vibrational mode coupled to the solvent polarization.",
author = "Dmitry Matyushov and Roland Schmid and Ladanyi, {Branka M.}",
year = "1997",
month = "2",
day = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "1035--1050",
journal = "Journal of Physical Chemistry B Materials",
issn = "1520-6106",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A thermodynamic analysis of the π * and ET(30) polarity scales

AU - Matyushov, Dmitry

AU - Schmid, Roland

AU - Ladanyi, Branka M.

PY - 1997/2/6

Y1 - 1997/2/6

N2 - The solvent-induced UV-vis spectral shifts in 4-nitroanisole and pyridinium N-phenoxide betaine-30 dyes utilized in the famous π* and ET(30) polarity scales, respectively, are analyzed by molecular theories in terms of long-range solute-solvent interactions due to induction, dispersion, and dipole-dipole forces. The solvent-induced shift is represented as a sum of the differential solute-solvent internal energy and the differential energy of binding the solvent molecules in the solute vicinity. The aim of the study is 3-fold: (i) to clarify and quantify the relative effects of the three types of interactions, (ii) to elicit the magnitude of the effect of specific forces, and (iii) to evaluate the contribution of the differential solvent binding to the spectral shift. For (i), the dye properties directing the weighting are the size and the differences in both polarizability and dipole moment between ground and excited states. Accordingly, the distinctions π* vs ET(30) derive from the different sizes (4.5 vs 6.4 Å), dramatically different polarizability enhancement upon excitation (6 vs 61 Å3), and opposite changes in the dipole moment (+8.2 vs -8.6 D) of the two dyes. As a key result, the importance of dispersion forces to the spectral shift even in highly polar liquids is emphasized. While the contributions of dispersions and inductions are comparable in the π* scale, inductions are clearly overshadowed by dispersions in the ET(30) values. Both effects reinforce each other in π*, producing the well-known red shift. For the ET(30) scale, the effects due to dispersion and dipolar solvation have opposite signs making the red shift for nonpolar solvents switch to the blue for polar solvents. For (ii), there is overall reasonable agreement between theory and experiment for both dyes, as far as the nonpolar and select solvents are concerned, but there are also discrepant solvent classes. Thus, the predicted ET(30) values for protic solvents are uniformly too low, revealing a decrease in H-bonding interactions of the excited state with lowered dipole moment. Further, the calculated π* values of aromatic and chlorinated solvents are throughout too high, and this is explained by an increase in charge-transfer interactions of the more delocalized excited state. For (iii), the differential solvent binding energies have been extracted from experimental thermochromic data. For strongly polar fluids, the solute-solvent component of the shift overshadows that from the solvent binding energy variation. In nonpolar and weakly polar liquids the two parts are comparable for 4-nitroanisole, but the latter is still small for betaine-30. Experimental and calculated values in the present work parameters for betaine-30 are applied to calculating solvent reorganization energies λs of intramolecular electron transfer. λs is separated into polar activation by the solvent permanent dipoles and nonpolar activation due to induction and dispersion forces. Experimental reorganization energies due to the classical solvent and solute modes are throughout higher than the calculated λs values. The difference depends on solvent polarity and was attributed to the solute donor - acceptor vibrational mode coupled to the solvent polarization.

AB - The solvent-induced UV-vis spectral shifts in 4-nitroanisole and pyridinium N-phenoxide betaine-30 dyes utilized in the famous π* and ET(30) polarity scales, respectively, are analyzed by molecular theories in terms of long-range solute-solvent interactions due to induction, dispersion, and dipole-dipole forces. The solvent-induced shift is represented as a sum of the differential solute-solvent internal energy and the differential energy of binding the solvent molecules in the solute vicinity. The aim of the study is 3-fold: (i) to clarify and quantify the relative effects of the three types of interactions, (ii) to elicit the magnitude of the effect of specific forces, and (iii) to evaluate the contribution of the differential solvent binding to the spectral shift. For (i), the dye properties directing the weighting are the size and the differences in both polarizability and dipole moment between ground and excited states. Accordingly, the distinctions π* vs ET(30) derive from the different sizes (4.5 vs 6.4 Å), dramatically different polarizability enhancement upon excitation (6 vs 61 Å3), and opposite changes in the dipole moment (+8.2 vs -8.6 D) of the two dyes. As a key result, the importance of dispersion forces to the spectral shift even in highly polar liquids is emphasized. While the contributions of dispersions and inductions are comparable in the π* scale, inductions are clearly overshadowed by dispersions in the ET(30) values. Both effects reinforce each other in π*, producing the well-known red shift. For the ET(30) scale, the effects due to dispersion and dipolar solvation have opposite signs making the red shift for nonpolar solvents switch to the blue for polar solvents. For (ii), there is overall reasonable agreement between theory and experiment for both dyes, as far as the nonpolar and select solvents are concerned, but there are also discrepant solvent classes. Thus, the predicted ET(30) values for protic solvents are uniformly too low, revealing a decrease in H-bonding interactions of the excited state with lowered dipole moment. Further, the calculated π* values of aromatic and chlorinated solvents are throughout too high, and this is explained by an increase in charge-transfer interactions of the more delocalized excited state. For (iii), the differential solvent binding energies have been extracted from experimental thermochromic data. For strongly polar fluids, the solute-solvent component of the shift overshadows that from the solvent binding energy variation. In nonpolar and weakly polar liquids the two parts are comparable for 4-nitroanisole, but the latter is still small for betaine-30. Experimental and calculated values in the present work parameters for betaine-30 are applied to calculating solvent reorganization energies λs of intramolecular electron transfer. λs is separated into polar activation by the solvent permanent dipoles and nonpolar activation due to induction and dispersion forces. Experimental reorganization energies due to the classical solvent and solute modes are throughout higher than the calculated λs values. The difference depends on solvent polarity and was attributed to the solute donor - acceptor vibrational mode coupled to the solvent polarization.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031555732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031555732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031555732

VL - 101

SP - 1035

EP - 1050

JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry B Materials

JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry B Materials

SN - 1520-6106

IS - 6

ER -