A student guide to proofreading and writing in science

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Scientific writing requires a distinct style and tone, whether the writing is intended for an undergraduate assignment or publication in a peer-reviewed journal. From the first to the final draft, scientific writing is an iterative process requiring practice, substantial feedback from peers and instructors, and comprehensive proofreading on the part of the writer. Teaching writing or proofreading is not common in university settings. Here, we present a collection of common undergraduate student writing mistakes and put forth suggestions for corrections as a first step toward proofreading and enhancing readability in subsequent draft versions. Additionally, we propose specific strategies pertaining to word choice, structure, and approach to make products more fluid and focused for an appropriate target audience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)324-331
Number of pages8
JournalAdvances in physiology education
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Students
Publications
Teaching

Keywords

  • Pedagogy
  • Undergraduate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Physiology

Cite this

A student guide to proofreading and writing in science. / Hyatt, Jon-Philippe; Bienenstock, Elisa; Tilan, Jason U.

In: Advances in physiology education, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2017, p. 324-331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4bfc3a8401e4411ab74b459f1fc240d5,
title = "A student guide to proofreading and writing in science",
abstract = "Scientific writing requires a distinct style and tone, whether the writing is intended for an undergraduate assignment or publication in a peer-reviewed journal. From the first to the final draft, scientific writing is an iterative process requiring practice, substantial feedback from peers and instructors, and comprehensive proofreading on the part of the writer. Teaching writing or proofreading is not common in university settings. Here, we present a collection of common undergraduate student writing mistakes and put forth suggestions for corrections as a first step toward proofreading and enhancing readability in subsequent draft versions. Additionally, we propose specific strategies pertaining to word choice, structure, and approach to make products more fluid and focused for an appropriate target audience.",
keywords = "Pedagogy, Undergraduate",
author = "Jon-Philippe Hyatt and Elisa Bienenstock and Tilan, {Jason U.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1152/advan.00004.2017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "324--331",
journal = "American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education",
issn = "1043-4046",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A student guide to proofreading and writing in science

AU - Hyatt, Jon-Philippe

AU - Bienenstock, Elisa

AU - Tilan, Jason U.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Scientific writing requires a distinct style and tone, whether the writing is intended for an undergraduate assignment or publication in a peer-reviewed journal. From the first to the final draft, scientific writing is an iterative process requiring practice, substantial feedback from peers and instructors, and comprehensive proofreading on the part of the writer. Teaching writing or proofreading is not common in university settings. Here, we present a collection of common undergraduate student writing mistakes and put forth suggestions for corrections as a first step toward proofreading and enhancing readability in subsequent draft versions. Additionally, we propose specific strategies pertaining to word choice, structure, and approach to make products more fluid and focused for an appropriate target audience.

AB - Scientific writing requires a distinct style and tone, whether the writing is intended for an undergraduate assignment or publication in a peer-reviewed journal. From the first to the final draft, scientific writing is an iterative process requiring practice, substantial feedback from peers and instructors, and comprehensive proofreading on the part of the writer. Teaching writing or proofreading is not common in university settings. Here, we present a collection of common undergraduate student writing mistakes and put forth suggestions for corrections as a first step toward proofreading and enhancing readability in subsequent draft versions. Additionally, we propose specific strategies pertaining to word choice, structure, and approach to make products more fluid and focused for an appropriate target audience.

KW - Pedagogy

KW - Undergraduate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021830284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021830284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/advan.00004.2017

DO - 10.1152/advan.00004.2017

M3 - Article

C2 - 28679566

AN - SCOPUS:85021830284

VL - 41

SP - 324

EP - 331

JO - American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

JF - American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

SN - 1043-4046

IS - 3

ER -