A simulated "cocktail party" with up to three sound sources

William Yost, Raymond H. Dye, Stanley Sheft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Listeners identified spoken words, letters, and numbers and the spatial location of these utterances in three listening conditions as a function of the number of simultaneously presented utterances. The three listening conditions were a normal listening condition, in which the sounds were presented over seven possible loudspeakers to a listener seated in a sound-deadened listening room; a one-headphone listening condition, in which a single microphone that was placed in the listening room delivered the sounds to a single headphone worn by the listener in a remote room; and a stationary KEMAR listening condition, in which binaural recordings from an acoustic manikin placed in the listening room were delivered to a listener in the remote room. The listeners were presented one, two, or three simultaneous utterances. The results show that utterance identification was better in the normal listening condition than in the one-headphone condition, with the KEMAR listening condition yielding intermediate levels of performance. However, the differences between listening in the normal and in the one-headphone conditions were much smaller when two, rather than three, utterances were presented at a time. Localization performance was good for both the normal and the KEMAR listening conditions and at chance for the one-headphone condition. The results suggest that binaural processing is probably more important for solving the "cocktail party" problem when there are more than two concurrent sound sources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1026-1036
Number of pages11
JournalPerception and Psychophysics
Volume58
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

listener
Manikins
Acoustics
acoustics
performance
recording
Utterance
Listeners
Sound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

A simulated "cocktail party" with up to three sound sources. / Yost, William; Dye, Raymond H.; Sheft, Stanley.

In: Perception and Psychophysics, Vol. 58, No. 7, 01.01.1996, p. 1026-1036.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yost, William ; Dye, Raymond H. ; Sheft, Stanley. / A simulated "cocktail party" with up to three sound sources. In: Perception and Psychophysics. 1996 ; Vol. 58, No. 7. pp. 1026-1036.
@article{0b105585d7eb4207945327ffda8c8d57,
title = "A simulated {"}cocktail party{"} with up to three sound sources",
abstract = "Listeners identified spoken words, letters, and numbers and the spatial location of these utterances in three listening conditions as a function of the number of simultaneously presented utterances. The three listening conditions were a normal listening condition, in which the sounds were presented over seven possible loudspeakers to a listener seated in a sound-deadened listening room; a one-headphone listening condition, in which a single microphone that was placed in the listening room delivered the sounds to a single headphone worn by the listener in a remote room; and a stationary KEMAR listening condition, in which binaural recordings from an acoustic manikin placed in the listening room were delivered to a listener in the remote room. The listeners were presented one, two, or three simultaneous utterances. The results show that utterance identification was better in the normal listening condition than in the one-headphone condition, with the KEMAR listening condition yielding intermediate levels of performance. However, the differences between listening in the normal and in the one-headphone conditions were much smaller when two, rather than three, utterances were presented at a time. Localization performance was good for both the normal and the KEMAR listening conditions and at chance for the one-headphone condition. The results suggest that binaural processing is probably more important for solving the {"}cocktail party{"} problem when there are more than two concurrent sound sources.",
author = "William Yost and Dye, {Raymond H.} and Stanley Sheft",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03206830",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "1026--1036",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A simulated "cocktail party" with up to three sound sources

AU - Yost, William

AU - Dye, Raymond H.

AU - Sheft, Stanley

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Listeners identified spoken words, letters, and numbers and the spatial location of these utterances in three listening conditions as a function of the number of simultaneously presented utterances. The three listening conditions were a normal listening condition, in which the sounds were presented over seven possible loudspeakers to a listener seated in a sound-deadened listening room; a one-headphone listening condition, in which a single microphone that was placed in the listening room delivered the sounds to a single headphone worn by the listener in a remote room; and a stationary KEMAR listening condition, in which binaural recordings from an acoustic manikin placed in the listening room were delivered to a listener in the remote room. The listeners were presented one, two, or three simultaneous utterances. The results show that utterance identification was better in the normal listening condition than in the one-headphone condition, with the KEMAR listening condition yielding intermediate levels of performance. However, the differences between listening in the normal and in the one-headphone conditions were much smaller when two, rather than three, utterances were presented at a time. Localization performance was good for both the normal and the KEMAR listening conditions and at chance for the one-headphone condition. The results suggest that binaural processing is probably more important for solving the "cocktail party" problem when there are more than two concurrent sound sources.

AB - Listeners identified spoken words, letters, and numbers and the spatial location of these utterances in three listening conditions as a function of the number of simultaneously presented utterances. The three listening conditions were a normal listening condition, in which the sounds were presented over seven possible loudspeakers to a listener seated in a sound-deadened listening room; a one-headphone listening condition, in which a single microphone that was placed in the listening room delivered the sounds to a single headphone worn by the listener in a remote room; and a stationary KEMAR listening condition, in which binaural recordings from an acoustic manikin placed in the listening room were delivered to a listener in the remote room. The listeners were presented one, two, or three simultaneous utterances. The results show that utterance identification was better in the normal listening condition than in the one-headphone condition, with the KEMAR listening condition yielding intermediate levels of performance. However, the differences between listening in the normal and in the one-headphone conditions were much smaller when two, rather than three, utterances were presented at a time. Localization performance was good for both the normal and the KEMAR listening conditions and at chance for the one-headphone condition. The results suggest that binaural processing is probably more important for solving the "cocktail party" problem when there are more than two concurrent sound sources.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030300190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030300190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03206830

DO - 10.3758/BF03206830

M3 - Article

C2 - 8920839

AN - SCOPUS:0030300190

VL - 58

SP - 1026

EP - 1036

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 7

ER -