A simple model for behaviour change in epidemics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. People change their behaviour during an epidemic. Infectious members of a population may reduce the number of contacts they make with other people because of the physical effects of their illness and possibly because of public health announcements asking them to do so in order to decrease the number of new infections, while susceptible members of the population may reduce the number of contacts they make in order to try to avoid becoming infected. Methods. We consider a simple epidemic model in which susceptible and infectious members respond to a disease outbreak by reducing contacts by different fractions and analyze the effect of such contact reductions on the size of the epidemic. We assume constant fractional reductions, without attempting to consider the way in which susceptible members might respond to information about the epidemic. Results. We are able to derive upper and lower bounds for the final size of an epidemic, both for simple and staged progression models. Conclusions. The responses of uninfected and infected individuals in a disease outbreak are different, and this difference affects estimates of epidemic size.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberS3
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume11
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 17 2011

Fingerprint

Disease Outbreaks
Population
Public Health
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

A simple model for behaviour change in epidemics. / Brauer, Fred.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 11, No. SUPPL. 1, S3, 17.03.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f89524b8927d44d2b9f96dfde9f67b5b,
title = "A simple model for behaviour change in epidemics",
abstract = "Background. People change their behaviour during an epidemic. Infectious members of a population may reduce the number of contacts they make with other people because of the physical effects of their illness and possibly because of public health announcements asking them to do so in order to decrease the number of new infections, while susceptible members of the population may reduce the number of contacts they make in order to try to avoid becoming infected. Methods. We consider a simple epidemic model in which susceptible and infectious members respond to a disease outbreak by reducing contacts by different fractions and analyze the effect of such contact reductions on the size of the epidemic. We assume constant fractional reductions, without attempting to consider the way in which susceptible members might respond to information about the epidemic. Results. We are able to derive upper and lower bounds for the final size of an epidemic, both for simple and staged progression models. Conclusions. The responses of uninfected and infected individuals in a disease outbreak are different, and this difference affects estimates of epidemic size.",
author = "Fred Brauer",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2458-11-S2-S3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A simple model for behaviour change in epidemics

AU - Brauer, Fred

PY - 2011/3/17

Y1 - 2011/3/17

N2 - Background. People change their behaviour during an epidemic. Infectious members of a population may reduce the number of contacts they make with other people because of the physical effects of their illness and possibly because of public health announcements asking them to do so in order to decrease the number of new infections, while susceptible members of the population may reduce the number of contacts they make in order to try to avoid becoming infected. Methods. We consider a simple epidemic model in which susceptible and infectious members respond to a disease outbreak by reducing contacts by different fractions and analyze the effect of such contact reductions on the size of the epidemic. We assume constant fractional reductions, without attempting to consider the way in which susceptible members might respond to information about the epidemic. Results. We are able to derive upper and lower bounds for the final size of an epidemic, both for simple and staged progression models. Conclusions. The responses of uninfected and infected individuals in a disease outbreak are different, and this difference affects estimates of epidemic size.

AB - Background. People change their behaviour during an epidemic. Infectious members of a population may reduce the number of contacts they make with other people because of the physical effects of their illness and possibly because of public health announcements asking them to do so in order to decrease the number of new infections, while susceptible members of the population may reduce the number of contacts they make in order to try to avoid becoming infected. Methods. We consider a simple epidemic model in which susceptible and infectious members respond to a disease outbreak by reducing contacts by different fractions and analyze the effect of such contact reductions on the size of the epidemic. We assume constant fractional reductions, without attempting to consider the way in which susceptible members might respond to information about the epidemic. Results. We are able to derive upper and lower bounds for the final size of an epidemic, both for simple and staged progression models. Conclusions. The responses of uninfected and infected individuals in a disease outbreak are different, and this difference affects estimates of epidemic size.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952552502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952552502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S2-S3

DO - 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S2-S3

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

IS - SUPPL. 1

M1 - S3

ER -