A short soliloquy on merit

Sarah J. Tracy

doi:10.1525/dcqr.2019.8.4.47

A short soliloquy on merit

Sarah J. Tracy

Human Communication, Hugh Downs School of

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Merit is often considered to be a neutral and therefore fair way to judge quality. Through soliloquy and graphics, this essay deconstructs and interrogates the definition of merit, revealing the ways that it is tied to standardization and dominant knowledge.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	47-49
Number of pages	3
Journal	Departures in Critical Qualitative Research
Volume	8
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1525/dcqr.2019.8.4.47
State	Published - Dec 1 2019

Keywords

Deconstruction
Diversity
Merit
Power
Soliloquy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Linguistics and Language
Language and Linguistics
Communication

Access to Document

10.1525/dcqr.2019.8.4.47

Cite this

@article{f674c9c4cee64d38a3d3ce787b9d29fb,

title = "A short soliloquy on merit",

abstract = "Merit is often considered to be a neutral and therefore fair way to judge quality. Through soliloquy and graphics, this essay deconstructs and interrogates the definition of merit, revealing the ways that it is tied to standardization and dominant knowledge.",

keywords = "Deconstruction, Diversity, Merit, Power, Soliloquy",

author = "Tracy, {Sarah J.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 by the Regents of the University of California.",

year = "2019",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1525/dcqr.2019.8.4.47",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "8",

pages = "47--49",

journal = "Departures in Critical Qualitative Research",

issn = "2333-9489",

publisher = "University of California Press",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A short soliloquy on merit

AU - Tracy, Sarah J.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Merit is often considered to be a neutral and therefore fair way to judge quality. Through soliloquy and graphics, this essay deconstructs and interrogates the definition of merit, revealing the ways that it is tied to standardization and dominant knowledge.

AB - Merit is often considered to be a neutral and therefore fair way to judge quality. Through soliloquy and graphics, this essay deconstructs and interrogates the definition of merit, revealing the ways that it is tied to standardization and dominant knowledge.

KW - Deconstruction

KW - Diversity

KW - Merit

KW - Power

KW - Soliloquy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086853711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086853711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1525/dcqr.2019.8.4.47

DO - 10.1525/dcqr.2019.8.4.47

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85086853711

SN - 2333-9489

VL - 8

SP - 47

EP - 49

JO - Departures in Critical Qualitative Research

JF - Departures in Critical Qualitative Research

IS - 4

ER -

A short soliloquy on merit

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this