A Short Note on Interpretation in the Dual Change Score Model

Ross Jacobucci, Sarfaraz Serang, Kevin J. Grimm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The latent change score framework allows for estimating a variety of univariate trajectory models, such as the no change, linear change, exponential forms of change, as well as multivariate trajectory models that allow for coupling between two or more constructs. A particularly attractive feature of these models is that it is easy to decompose and interpret aspects of change. One particularly flexible model, the dual change score model, has two components of change: a proportional change component that depends on scores at the previous time point, and a constant change component that is additive. We demonstrate through simulation and an empirical example that in a correctly specified model, the correlation between the proportional change parameter and the mean of the constant change component can approach either −1 or 1, thus complicating interpretation. We provide recommendations and code to aid researchers’ ability to diagnose this issue in their own data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)924-930
Number of pages7
JournalStructural Equation Modeling
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2 2019

Fingerprint

interpretation
Directly proportional
Trajectories
Model
Trajectory
Univariate
Interpretation
Recommendations
Decompose
simulation
ability
Demonstrate
Simulation

Keywords

  • latent change score
  • latent growth
  • Longitudinal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

A Short Note on Interpretation in the Dual Change Score Model. / Jacobucci, Ross; Serang, Sarfaraz; Grimm, Kevin J.

In: Structural Equation Modeling, Vol. 26, No. 6, 02.11.2019, p. 924-930.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jacobucci, Ross ; Serang, Sarfaraz ; Grimm, Kevin J. / A Short Note on Interpretation in the Dual Change Score Model. In: Structural Equation Modeling. 2019 ; Vol. 26, No. 6. pp. 924-930.
@article{83abbb9ee97541439f0a1382fd97cdec,
title = "A Short Note on Interpretation in the Dual Change Score Model",
abstract = "The latent change score framework allows for estimating a variety of univariate trajectory models, such as the no change, linear change, exponential forms of change, as well as multivariate trajectory models that allow for coupling between two or more constructs. A particularly attractive feature of these models is that it is easy to decompose and interpret aspects of change. One particularly flexible model, the dual change score model, has two components of change: a proportional change component that depends on scores at the previous time point, and a constant change component that is additive. We demonstrate through simulation and an empirical example that in a correctly specified model, the correlation between the proportional change parameter and the mean of the constant change component can approach either −1 or 1, thus complicating interpretation. We provide recommendations and code to aid researchers’ ability to diagnose this issue in their own data.",
keywords = "latent change score, latent growth, Longitudinal",
author = "Ross Jacobucci and Sarfaraz Serang and Grimm, {Kevin J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10705511.2019.1619457",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "924--930",
journal = "Structural Equation Modeling",
issn = "1070-5511",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Short Note on Interpretation in the Dual Change Score Model

AU - Jacobucci, Ross

AU - Serang, Sarfaraz

AU - Grimm, Kevin J.

PY - 2019/11/2

Y1 - 2019/11/2

N2 - The latent change score framework allows for estimating a variety of univariate trajectory models, such as the no change, linear change, exponential forms of change, as well as multivariate trajectory models that allow for coupling between two or more constructs. A particularly attractive feature of these models is that it is easy to decompose and interpret aspects of change. One particularly flexible model, the dual change score model, has two components of change: a proportional change component that depends on scores at the previous time point, and a constant change component that is additive. We demonstrate through simulation and an empirical example that in a correctly specified model, the correlation between the proportional change parameter and the mean of the constant change component can approach either −1 or 1, thus complicating interpretation. We provide recommendations and code to aid researchers’ ability to diagnose this issue in their own data.

AB - The latent change score framework allows for estimating a variety of univariate trajectory models, such as the no change, linear change, exponential forms of change, as well as multivariate trajectory models that allow for coupling between two or more constructs. A particularly attractive feature of these models is that it is easy to decompose and interpret aspects of change. One particularly flexible model, the dual change score model, has two components of change: a proportional change component that depends on scores at the previous time point, and a constant change component that is additive. We demonstrate through simulation and an empirical example that in a correctly specified model, the correlation between the proportional change parameter and the mean of the constant change component can approach either −1 or 1, thus complicating interpretation. We provide recommendations and code to aid researchers’ ability to diagnose this issue in their own data.

KW - latent change score

KW - latent growth

KW - Longitudinal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074121218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074121218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10705511.2019.1619457

DO - 10.1080/10705511.2019.1619457

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074121218

VL - 26

SP - 924

EP - 930

JO - Structural Equation Modeling

JF - Structural Equation Modeling

SN - 1070-5511

IS - 6

ER -