A seismic shift in U.S. federal arts policy

A tale of organizational challenge and controversy in the 1990s

Gordon Shockley, Connie L. McNeely

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The eruption of the "culture wars" in 1989 pushed U.S. arts policy to the forefront of the public agenda, leading to extreme political scrutiny of and controversy over the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and its funding activities. As the premier national-level public agency charged with supporting the arts in the United States, the NEA stood at the heart of debates on related arts policy. With an empirical focus on the NEA in the 1990s, we delineate and examine the broader effects and implications of the surrounding debates and related policy outcomes. In general, in keeping with the conservative political agenda of the 1990s in the United States, the result was the development of policies ostensibly aimed at promoting access to the arts that demoted concerns over artistic excellence, along with direct attacks on the NEA's overall administrative philosophy and decision-making practices. Employing insights from critical theory and reflexive sociology, we analyze the dramatic organizational shifts and programmatic restructuring initiated by the NEA in response to this situation and its ultimate effect on the relationships between art, artist, and audience in U.S. arts policy and society today.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-23
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Arts Management Law and Society
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

art
1990s
Art
Arts Policy
Arts policy
political agenda
critical theory
artist
Endowments
restructuring
sociology
funding
decision making
Agenda

Keywords

  • Critical theory
  • National endowment for the arts
  • Pierre Bourdieu
  • Theodore Adorno
  • U.S. Cultural policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts
  • Law
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

A seismic shift in U.S. federal arts policy : A tale of organizational challenge and controversy in the 1990s. / Shockley, Gordon; McNeely, Connie L.

In: Journal of Arts Management Law and Society, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2009, p. 7-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{207cf8a09fc4489c83bb76558c60d816,
title = "A seismic shift in U.S. federal arts policy: A tale of organizational challenge and controversy in the 1990s",
abstract = "The eruption of the {"}culture wars{"} in 1989 pushed U.S. arts policy to the forefront of the public agenda, leading to extreme political scrutiny of and controversy over the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and its funding activities. As the premier national-level public agency charged with supporting the arts in the United States, the NEA stood at the heart of debates on related arts policy. With an empirical focus on the NEA in the 1990s, we delineate and examine the broader effects and implications of the surrounding debates and related policy outcomes. In general, in keeping with the conservative political agenda of the 1990s in the United States, the result was the development of policies ostensibly aimed at promoting access to the arts that demoted concerns over artistic excellence, along with direct attacks on the NEA's overall administrative philosophy and decision-making practices. Employing insights from critical theory and reflexive sociology, we analyze the dramatic organizational shifts and programmatic restructuring initiated by the NEA in response to this situation and its ultimate effect on the relationships between art, artist, and audience in U.S. arts policy and society today.",
keywords = "Critical theory, National endowment for the arts, Pierre Bourdieu, Theodore Adorno, U.S. Cultural policy",
author = "Gordon Shockley and McNeely, {Connie L.}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.3200/JAML.39.1.7-23",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "7--23",
journal = "Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society",
issn = "1063-2921",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A seismic shift in U.S. federal arts policy

T2 - A tale of organizational challenge and controversy in the 1990s

AU - Shockley, Gordon

AU - McNeely, Connie L.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The eruption of the "culture wars" in 1989 pushed U.S. arts policy to the forefront of the public agenda, leading to extreme political scrutiny of and controversy over the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and its funding activities. As the premier national-level public agency charged with supporting the arts in the United States, the NEA stood at the heart of debates on related arts policy. With an empirical focus on the NEA in the 1990s, we delineate and examine the broader effects and implications of the surrounding debates and related policy outcomes. In general, in keeping with the conservative political agenda of the 1990s in the United States, the result was the development of policies ostensibly aimed at promoting access to the arts that demoted concerns over artistic excellence, along with direct attacks on the NEA's overall administrative philosophy and decision-making practices. Employing insights from critical theory and reflexive sociology, we analyze the dramatic organizational shifts and programmatic restructuring initiated by the NEA in response to this situation and its ultimate effect on the relationships between art, artist, and audience in U.S. arts policy and society today.

AB - The eruption of the "culture wars" in 1989 pushed U.S. arts policy to the forefront of the public agenda, leading to extreme political scrutiny of and controversy over the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and its funding activities. As the premier national-level public agency charged with supporting the arts in the United States, the NEA stood at the heart of debates on related arts policy. With an empirical focus on the NEA in the 1990s, we delineate and examine the broader effects and implications of the surrounding debates and related policy outcomes. In general, in keeping with the conservative political agenda of the 1990s in the United States, the result was the development of policies ostensibly aimed at promoting access to the arts that demoted concerns over artistic excellence, along with direct attacks on the NEA's overall administrative philosophy and decision-making practices. Employing insights from critical theory and reflexive sociology, we analyze the dramatic organizational shifts and programmatic restructuring initiated by the NEA in response to this situation and its ultimate effect on the relationships between art, artist, and audience in U.S. arts policy and society today.

KW - Critical theory

KW - National endowment for the arts

KW - Pierre Bourdieu

KW - Theodore Adorno

KW - U.S. Cultural policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954205283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954205283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3200/JAML.39.1.7-23

DO - 10.3200/JAML.39.1.7-23

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 7

EP - 23

JO - Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society

JF - Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society

SN - 1063-2921

IS - 1

ER -