A role theory approach to middle powers

Making sense of Indonesia’s place in the international system

Cameron Thies, Angguntari C. Sari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article provides a conceptual framework for understanding middle powers based on foreign policy role theory. It argues that role theory helps to reconcile existing approaches rooted in functional, behavioural, hierarchical and rhetorical definitions. Role theory has been usefully applied to the study of other statuses, such as major and emerging powers in the international system. This article defines a middle power as a type of status that is supported by auxiliary roles recognized by significant others. Roles which middle powers are expected to perform also provide a relational, social identity approach to classifying middle powers as opposed to one that is purely rhetorical or focused on self-conception of status. This article applies this roles-based framework to the case of Indonesia and finds that Southeast Asia’s largest country qualifies as a middle power, suggesting it may be usefully applied to classify other middle powers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-421
Number of pages25
JournalContemporary Southeast Asia
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

role theory
sense of place
international system
Indonesia
foreign policy
conceptual framework
Sensemaking

Keywords

  • Foreign policy
  • Indonesia
  • Middle power
  • Role theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

A role theory approach to middle powers : Making sense of Indonesia’s place in the international system. / Thies, Cameron; Sari, Angguntari C.

In: Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 40, No. 3, 01.12.2018, p. 397-421.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b5bfd549a2648c086ad6cd1462344bc,
title = "A role theory approach to middle powers: Making sense of Indonesia’s place in the international system",
abstract = "This article provides a conceptual framework for understanding middle powers based on foreign policy role theory. It argues that role theory helps to reconcile existing approaches rooted in functional, behavioural, hierarchical and rhetorical definitions. Role theory has been usefully applied to the study of other statuses, such as major and emerging powers in the international system. This article defines a middle power as a type of status that is supported by auxiliary roles recognized by significant others. Roles which middle powers are expected to perform also provide a relational, social identity approach to classifying middle powers as opposed to one that is purely rhetorical or focused on self-conception of status. This article applies this roles-based framework to the case of Indonesia and finds that Southeast Asia’s largest country qualifies as a middle power, suggesting it may be usefully applied to classify other middle powers.",
keywords = "Foreign policy, Indonesia, Middle power, Role theory",
author = "Cameron Thies and Sari, {Angguntari C.}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1355/cs40-3c",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "397--421",
journal = "Contemporary Southeast Asia",
issn = "0129-797X",
publisher = "Institute of Southeast Asian Studies",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A role theory approach to middle powers

T2 - Making sense of Indonesia’s place in the international system

AU - Thies, Cameron

AU - Sari, Angguntari C.

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - This article provides a conceptual framework for understanding middle powers based on foreign policy role theory. It argues that role theory helps to reconcile existing approaches rooted in functional, behavioural, hierarchical and rhetorical definitions. Role theory has been usefully applied to the study of other statuses, such as major and emerging powers in the international system. This article defines a middle power as a type of status that is supported by auxiliary roles recognized by significant others. Roles which middle powers are expected to perform also provide a relational, social identity approach to classifying middle powers as opposed to one that is purely rhetorical or focused on self-conception of status. This article applies this roles-based framework to the case of Indonesia and finds that Southeast Asia’s largest country qualifies as a middle power, suggesting it may be usefully applied to classify other middle powers.

AB - This article provides a conceptual framework for understanding middle powers based on foreign policy role theory. It argues that role theory helps to reconcile existing approaches rooted in functional, behavioural, hierarchical and rhetorical definitions. Role theory has been usefully applied to the study of other statuses, such as major and emerging powers in the international system. This article defines a middle power as a type of status that is supported by auxiliary roles recognized by significant others. Roles which middle powers are expected to perform also provide a relational, social identity approach to classifying middle powers as opposed to one that is purely rhetorical or focused on self-conception of status. This article applies this roles-based framework to the case of Indonesia and finds that Southeast Asia’s largest country qualifies as a middle power, suggesting it may be usefully applied to classify other middle powers.

KW - Foreign policy

KW - Indonesia

KW - Middle power

KW - Role theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061435839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061435839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1355/cs40-3c

DO - 10.1355/cs40-3c

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 397

EP - 421

JO - Contemporary Southeast Asia

JF - Contemporary Southeast Asia

SN - 0129-797X

IS - 3

ER -