A Randomized Trial of a Home-Based Educational Approach to Increase Live Donor Kidney Transplantation: Effects in Blacks and Whites

James R. Rodrigue, Danielle L. Cornell, Bruce Kaplan, Richard J. Howard

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    115 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Background: Blacks are disproportionately affected by chronic kidney disease, but are far less likely to undergo live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) than whites. We assessed the differential effectiveness in blacks and whites of a home-based (HB) LDKT educational approach. Study Design: A planned secondary analysis of a previously published randomized trial. Setting & Participants: 132 patients (60 black, 72 white) approved for kidney transplantation at 1 kidney transplant center in the southeastern United States. Intervention: Assignment to receive either standard clinic-based (CB) transplant education (n = 69) or CB plus an HB (CB + HB) LDKT education program (n = 63). The HB education program was culturally sensitive for blacks, including using a minority health educator, brochures that highlight minority transplant recipients and donors, and discussion of race-specific outcome data. Outcomes: Primary outcomes were proportions of patients with live donor inquiries, evaluations, and transplants 1 year after study participation. Measurements: Medical record and questionnaire data. Results: 69 patients were assigned to the CB group, and 63 to the CB + HB group. After 1 year, there were 96 living donor inquiries (72.7%), 62 living donor evaluations (47.0%), and 54 LDKTs (40.9%). Patients assigned to the CB + HB group were more likely to have had living donor inquiries (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 3.0), a living donor evaluated (OR, 2.7; CI, 1.4 to 5.4), and LDKT (OR, 3.0; CI, 1.5 to 5.9). The effect was greater in blacks than whites for living donor evaluations and LDKT, but not for living donor inquiries (treatment-by-race interaction, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.8, respectively). Blacks in the CB + HB group were more likely to have had at least 1 living donor inquiry (51.7% versus 77.4%), at least 1 living donor evaluated (17.2% versus 48.4%), and LDKT (13.8% versus 45.2%) than those in the CB group. By comparison, whites in the CB + HB group were more likely to have had at least 1 living donor inquiry (72.5% versus 87.5%), at least 1 living donor evaluated (47.5% versus 71.9%), and LDKT (42.5% versus 59.4%) than those in the CB group. Limitations: Single-center study with greater dropout rate in the CB + HB group. Conclusions: These results suggest that a culturally sensitive LDKT education program that reaches out to blacks and their social support network can overcome some barriers to LDKT in this population.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)663-670
    Number of pages8
    JournalAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
    Volume51
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Apr 2008

    Keywords

    • Randomized trial
    • kidney transplantation
    • living donation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Nephrology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Randomized Trial of a Home-Based Educational Approach to Increase Live Donor Kidney Transplantation: Effects in Blacks and Whites'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this