A preliminary framework in examining the influence of outcome information on evaluations of auditor decisions

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The expectation gap can be considered as a function of two components. The first component represents the difference between ex ante judgments of auditors and nonauditors who do not have outcome knowledge. The second component depicts the difference between nonauditor judgments that are made with and without negative outcome knowledge. Kinney and Nelson [dy96) suggest that these two components tend to offset each other resulting in little if any expectation gap. We build upon their study and provide a framework that shows that the effects of these two components is dependent upon the type of judgment elicited. Our preliminary framework suggests that if the judgment involves a likelihood or predictive assessment, then the two expectation gap components may be expected to offset each other. However, if the judgment involves performance evaluation, the two components are more likely to compound each other. An understanding of this framework is important so as not to lead to inappropriate conclusions about the expectation gap.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAdvances in Accounting
Pages177-187
Number of pages11
Volume19
StatePublished - 2002

Publication series

NameAdvances in Accounting
Volume19
ISSN (Print)08826110

Fingerprint

Evaluation
Auditors
Expectations gap
Performance evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting

Cite this

Lowe, D., & Reckers, P. (2002). A preliminary framework in examining the influence of outcome information on evaluations of auditor decisions. In Advances in Accounting (Vol. 19, pp. 177-187). (Advances in Accounting; Vol. 19).

A preliminary framework in examining the influence of outcome information on evaluations of auditor decisions. / Lowe, David; Reckers, Philip.

Advances in Accounting. Vol. 19 2002. p. 177-187 (Advances in Accounting; Vol. 19).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Lowe, D & Reckers, P 2002, A preliminary framework in examining the influence of outcome information on evaluations of auditor decisions. in Advances in Accounting. vol. 19, Advances in Accounting, vol. 19, pp. 177-187.
@inbook{f0af32e91def4e30aab45ce8750455e2,
title = "A preliminary framework in examining the influence of outcome information on evaluations of auditor decisions",
abstract = "The expectation gap can be considered as a function of two components. The first component represents the difference between ex ante judgments of auditors and nonauditors who do not have outcome knowledge. The second component depicts the difference between nonauditor judgments that are made with and without negative outcome knowledge. Kinney and Nelson [dy96) suggest that these two components tend to offset each other resulting in little if any expectation gap. We build upon their study and provide a framework that shows that the effects of these two components is dependent upon the type of judgment elicited. Our preliminary framework suggests that if the judgment involves a likelihood or predictive assessment, then the two expectation gap components may be expected to offset each other. However, if the judgment involves performance evaluation, the two components are more likely to compound each other. An understanding of this framework is important so as not to lead to inappropriate conclusions about the expectation gap.",
author = "David Lowe and Philip Reckers",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0762308710",
volume = "19",
series = "Advances in Accounting",
pages = "177--187",
booktitle = "Advances in Accounting",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - A preliminary framework in examining the influence of outcome information on evaluations of auditor decisions

AU - Lowe, David

AU - Reckers, Philip

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The expectation gap can be considered as a function of two components. The first component represents the difference between ex ante judgments of auditors and nonauditors who do not have outcome knowledge. The second component depicts the difference between nonauditor judgments that are made with and without negative outcome knowledge. Kinney and Nelson [dy96) suggest that these two components tend to offset each other resulting in little if any expectation gap. We build upon their study and provide a framework that shows that the effects of these two components is dependent upon the type of judgment elicited. Our preliminary framework suggests that if the judgment involves a likelihood or predictive assessment, then the two expectation gap components may be expected to offset each other. However, if the judgment involves performance evaluation, the two components are more likely to compound each other. An understanding of this framework is important so as not to lead to inappropriate conclusions about the expectation gap.

AB - The expectation gap can be considered as a function of two components. The first component represents the difference between ex ante judgments of auditors and nonauditors who do not have outcome knowledge. The second component depicts the difference between nonauditor judgments that are made with and without negative outcome knowledge. Kinney and Nelson [dy96) suggest that these two components tend to offset each other resulting in little if any expectation gap. We build upon their study and provide a framework that shows that the effects of these two components is dependent upon the type of judgment elicited. Our preliminary framework suggests that if the judgment involves a likelihood or predictive assessment, then the two expectation gap components may be expected to offset each other. However, if the judgment involves performance evaluation, the two components are more likely to compound each other. An understanding of this framework is important so as not to lead to inappropriate conclusions about the expectation gap.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646582380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646582380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0762308710

SN - 9780762308712

VL - 19

T3 - Advances in Accounting

SP - 177

EP - 187

BT - Advances in Accounting

ER -