A pragmatic guide to qualitative historical analysis in the study of international relations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Researchers using qualitative methods, including case studies and comparative case studies, are becoming more self-conscious in enhancing the rigor of their research designs so as to maximize their explanatory leverage with a small number of cases. One aspect of qualitative research that has not received as much attention is the use of primary and secondary source material as data or evidence. This essay explores the potential problems encountered by political scientists as they conduct archival research or rely on secondary source material produced by historians. The essay also suggests guidelines for researchers to minimize the main problems associated with qualitative historical research, namely, investigator bias and unwarranted selectivity in the use of historical source materials. These guidelines should enable advanced undergraduates and graduate students to enhance the quality of their historically minded political science scholarship.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)351-372
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Studies Perspectives
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

international relations
historical analysis
pragmatics
political scientist
qualitative method
political science
research planning
qualitative research
historian
comparative study
student
graduate
trend
evidence
analysis
material

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Historiography
  • Qualitative research
  • Selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

A pragmatic guide to qualitative historical analysis in the study of international relations. / Thies, Cameron.

In: International Studies Perspectives, Vol. 3, No. 4, 11.2002, p. 351-372.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2e8363d1253742c187fbf6584d9a43cc,
title = "A pragmatic guide to qualitative historical analysis in the study of international relations",
abstract = "Researchers using qualitative methods, including case studies and comparative case studies, are becoming more self-conscious in enhancing the rigor of their research designs so as to maximize their explanatory leverage with a small number of cases. One aspect of qualitative research that has not received as much attention is the use of primary and secondary source material as data or evidence. This essay explores the potential problems encountered by political scientists as they conduct archival research or rely on secondary source material produced by historians. The essay also suggests guidelines for researchers to minimize the main problems associated with qualitative historical research, namely, investigator bias and unwarranted selectivity in the use of historical source materials. These guidelines should enable advanced undergraduates and graduate students to enhance the quality of their historically minded political science scholarship.",
keywords = "Bias, Historiography, Qualitative research, Selection",
author = "Cameron Thies",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/1528-3577.t01-1-00099",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "351--372",
journal = "International Studies Perspectives",
issn = "1528-3577",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A pragmatic guide to qualitative historical analysis in the study of international relations

AU - Thies, Cameron

PY - 2002/11

Y1 - 2002/11

N2 - Researchers using qualitative methods, including case studies and comparative case studies, are becoming more self-conscious in enhancing the rigor of their research designs so as to maximize their explanatory leverage with a small number of cases. One aspect of qualitative research that has not received as much attention is the use of primary and secondary source material as data or evidence. This essay explores the potential problems encountered by political scientists as they conduct archival research or rely on secondary source material produced by historians. The essay also suggests guidelines for researchers to minimize the main problems associated with qualitative historical research, namely, investigator bias and unwarranted selectivity in the use of historical source materials. These guidelines should enable advanced undergraduates and graduate students to enhance the quality of their historically minded political science scholarship.

AB - Researchers using qualitative methods, including case studies and comparative case studies, are becoming more self-conscious in enhancing the rigor of their research designs so as to maximize their explanatory leverage with a small number of cases. One aspect of qualitative research that has not received as much attention is the use of primary and secondary source material as data or evidence. This essay explores the potential problems encountered by political scientists as they conduct archival research or rely on secondary source material produced by historians. The essay also suggests guidelines for researchers to minimize the main problems associated with qualitative historical research, namely, investigator bias and unwarranted selectivity in the use of historical source materials. These guidelines should enable advanced undergraduates and graduate students to enhance the quality of their historically minded political science scholarship.

KW - Bias

KW - Historiography

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036868570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036868570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1528-3577.t01-1-00099

DO - 10.1111/1528-3577.t01-1-00099

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 351

EP - 372

JO - International Studies Perspectives

JF - International Studies Perspectives

SN - 1528-3577

IS - 4

ER -