A New Perspective for Evaluating Innovative Science Programs

Daniel T. Hickey, Steven Zuiker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper outlines a stridently sociocultural perspective on educational program evaluation. This perspective emerged across successive attempts to evaluate science programs in a manner consistent with sociocultural views of knowing and learning, while still yielding conventional evidence of achievement. The perspective is characterized by (1) rigorous use of multiple-choice tests, performance assessments, and interpretive event-based analyses, (2) a dialectical approach to reconciling conflicting conclusions from different types of individual assessments, and between individual and event-oriented assessments, and (3) a pragmatic focus on the differences among various implementations of the innovation, with judicious, targeted use of comparison groups. Innovators facing the tension between contemporary views of knowing and learning and conventional views of accountability should find this perspective particularly useful. It is relevant for a broad range of evaluation contexts, including large-scale externally funded innovations as well as more informal practitioner-initiated studies, and should be useful in many content domains.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)539-563
Number of pages25
JournalScience Education
Volume87
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

science
innovation
innovator
event
performance assessment
evaluation
educational program
learning
pragmatics
responsibility
Conventional
Innovation
evidence
Group
Performance Assessment
Multiple Choice
Education
Program Evaluation
Sociocultural Perspective
Evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

A New Perspective for Evaluating Innovative Science Programs. / Hickey, Daniel T.; Zuiker, Steven.

In: Science Education, Vol. 87, No. 4, 07.2003, p. 539-563.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hickey, Daniel T. ; Zuiker, Steven. / A New Perspective for Evaluating Innovative Science Programs. In: Science Education. 2003 ; Vol. 87, No. 4. pp. 539-563.
@article{0add00fee86e4e699cd49ae40ed95f72,
title = "A New Perspective for Evaluating Innovative Science Programs",
abstract = "This paper outlines a stridently sociocultural perspective on educational program evaluation. This perspective emerged across successive attempts to evaluate science programs in a manner consistent with sociocultural views of knowing and learning, while still yielding conventional evidence of achievement. The perspective is characterized by (1) rigorous use of multiple-choice tests, performance assessments, and interpretive event-based analyses, (2) a dialectical approach to reconciling conflicting conclusions from different types of individual assessments, and between individual and event-oriented assessments, and (3) a pragmatic focus on the differences among various implementations of the innovation, with judicious, targeted use of comparison groups. Innovators facing the tension between contemporary views of knowing and learning and conventional views of accountability should find this perspective particularly useful. It is relevant for a broad range of evaluation contexts, including large-scale externally funded innovations as well as more informal practitioner-initiated studies, and should be useful in many content domains.",
author = "Hickey, {Daniel T.} and Steven Zuiker",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/sce.10087",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "539--563",
journal = "Science Education",
issn = "0036-8326",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A New Perspective for Evaluating Innovative Science Programs

AU - Hickey, Daniel T.

AU - Zuiker, Steven

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - This paper outlines a stridently sociocultural perspective on educational program evaluation. This perspective emerged across successive attempts to evaluate science programs in a manner consistent with sociocultural views of knowing and learning, while still yielding conventional evidence of achievement. The perspective is characterized by (1) rigorous use of multiple-choice tests, performance assessments, and interpretive event-based analyses, (2) a dialectical approach to reconciling conflicting conclusions from different types of individual assessments, and between individual and event-oriented assessments, and (3) a pragmatic focus on the differences among various implementations of the innovation, with judicious, targeted use of comparison groups. Innovators facing the tension between contemporary views of knowing and learning and conventional views of accountability should find this perspective particularly useful. It is relevant for a broad range of evaluation contexts, including large-scale externally funded innovations as well as more informal practitioner-initiated studies, and should be useful in many content domains.

AB - This paper outlines a stridently sociocultural perspective on educational program evaluation. This perspective emerged across successive attempts to evaluate science programs in a manner consistent with sociocultural views of knowing and learning, while still yielding conventional evidence of achievement. The perspective is characterized by (1) rigorous use of multiple-choice tests, performance assessments, and interpretive event-based analyses, (2) a dialectical approach to reconciling conflicting conclusions from different types of individual assessments, and between individual and event-oriented assessments, and (3) a pragmatic focus on the differences among various implementations of the innovation, with judicious, targeted use of comparison groups. Innovators facing the tension between contemporary views of knowing and learning and conventional views of accountability should find this perspective particularly useful. It is relevant for a broad range of evaluation contexts, including large-scale externally funded innovations as well as more informal practitioner-initiated studies, and should be useful in many content domains.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037757656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037757656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/sce.10087

DO - 10.1002/sce.10087

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 539

EP - 563

JO - Science Education

JF - Science Education

SN - 0036-8326

IS - 4

ER -