A new layout optimization technique for interferometric arrays, applied to the Murchison Widefield Array

A. P. Beardsley, B. J. Hazelton, M. F. Morales, R. J. Capallo, R. Goeke, D. Emrich, C. J. Lonsdale, W. Arcus, D. Barnes, G. Bernardi, Judd Bowman, J. D. Bunton, B. E. Corey, A. Deshpande, L. deSouza, B. M. Gaensler, L. J. Greenhill, D. Herne, J. N. Hewitt, D. L. KaplanJ. C. Kasper, B. B. Kincaid, R. Koenig, E. Kratzenberg, M. J. Lynch, S. R. McWhirter, D. A. Mitchell, E. Morgan, D. Oberoi, S. M. Ord, J. Pathikulangara, T. Prabu, R. A. Remillard, A. E E Rogers, A. Roshi, J. E. Salah, R. J. Sault, N. Udaya Shankar, K. S. Srivani, J. Stevens, R. Subrahmanyan, S. J. Tingay, R. B. Wayth, M. Waterson, R. L. Webster, A. R. Whitney, A. Williams, C. L. Williams, J. S B Wyithe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Antenna layout is an important design consideration for radio interferometers because it determines the quality of the snapshot point spread function (PSF, or array beam). This is particularly true for experiments targeting the 21-cm Epoch of Reionization signal as the quality of the foreground subtraction depends directly on the spatial dynamic range and thus the smoothness of the baseline distribution. Nearly all sites have constraints on where antennas can be placed - even at the remote Australian location of the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) there are rock outcrops, flood zones, heritages areas, emergency runways and trees. These exclusion areas can introduce spatial structure into the baseline distribution that enhances the PSF sidelobes and reduces the angular dynamic range. In this paper we present a new method of constrained antenna placement that reduces the spatial structure in the baseline distribution. This method not only outperforms random placement algorithms that avoid exclusion zones, but surprisingly outperforms random placement algorithms without constraints to provide what we believe are the smoothest constrained baseline distributions developed to date. We use our new algorithm to determine antenna placements for the originally planned MWA, and present the antenna locations, baseline distribution and snapshot PSF for this array choice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1781-1788
Number of pages8
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume425
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 21 2012

Fingerprint

layouts
antenna
antennas
optimization
exclusion
dynamic range
radio interferometers
runways
sidelobes
outcrops
emergencies
point spread functions
interferometer
subtraction
targeting
outcrop
time measurement
distribution
rocks
radio

Keywords

  • Cosmology: miscellaneous
  • Instrumentation: interferometers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cite this

Beardsley, A. P., Hazelton, B. J., Morales, M. F., Capallo, R. J., Goeke, R., Emrich, D., ... Wyithe, J. S. B. (2012). A new layout optimization technique for interferometric arrays, applied to the Murchison Widefield Array. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 425(3), 1781-1788. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20878.x

A new layout optimization technique for interferometric arrays, applied to the Murchison Widefield Array. / Beardsley, A. P.; Hazelton, B. J.; Morales, M. F.; Capallo, R. J.; Goeke, R.; Emrich, D.; Lonsdale, C. J.; Arcus, W.; Barnes, D.; Bernardi, G.; Bowman, Judd; Bunton, J. D.; Corey, B. E.; Deshpande, A.; deSouza, L.; Gaensler, B. M.; Greenhill, L. J.; Herne, D.; Hewitt, J. N.; Kaplan, D. L.; Kasper, J. C.; Kincaid, B. B.; Koenig, R.; Kratzenberg, E.; Lynch, M. J.; McWhirter, S. R.; Mitchell, D. A.; Morgan, E.; Oberoi, D.; Ord, S. M.; Pathikulangara, J.; Prabu, T.; Remillard, R. A.; Rogers, A. E E; Roshi, A.; Salah, J. E.; Sault, R. J.; Shankar, N. Udaya; Srivani, K. S.; Stevens, J.; Subrahmanyan, R.; Tingay, S. J.; Wayth, R. B.; Waterson, M.; Webster, R. L.; Whitney, A. R.; Williams, A.; Williams, C. L.; Wyithe, J. S B.

In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 425, No. 3, 21.09.2012, p. 1781-1788.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beardsley, AP, Hazelton, BJ, Morales, MF, Capallo, RJ, Goeke, R, Emrich, D, Lonsdale, CJ, Arcus, W, Barnes, D, Bernardi, G, Bowman, J, Bunton, JD, Corey, BE, Deshpande, A, deSouza, L, Gaensler, BM, Greenhill, LJ, Herne, D, Hewitt, JN, Kaplan, DL, Kasper, JC, Kincaid, BB, Koenig, R, Kratzenberg, E, Lynch, MJ, McWhirter, SR, Mitchell, DA, Morgan, E, Oberoi, D, Ord, SM, Pathikulangara, J, Prabu, T, Remillard, RA, Rogers, AEE, Roshi, A, Salah, JE, Sault, RJ, Shankar, NU, Srivani, KS, Stevens, J, Subrahmanyan, R, Tingay, SJ, Wayth, RB, Waterson, M, Webster, RL, Whitney, AR, Williams, A, Williams, CL & Wyithe, JSB 2012, 'A new layout optimization technique for interferometric arrays, applied to the Murchison Widefield Array', Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 425, no. 3, pp. 1781-1788. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20878.x
Beardsley, A. P. ; Hazelton, B. J. ; Morales, M. F. ; Capallo, R. J. ; Goeke, R. ; Emrich, D. ; Lonsdale, C. J. ; Arcus, W. ; Barnes, D. ; Bernardi, G. ; Bowman, Judd ; Bunton, J. D. ; Corey, B. E. ; Deshpande, A. ; deSouza, L. ; Gaensler, B. M. ; Greenhill, L. J. ; Herne, D. ; Hewitt, J. N. ; Kaplan, D. L. ; Kasper, J. C. ; Kincaid, B. B. ; Koenig, R. ; Kratzenberg, E. ; Lynch, M. J. ; McWhirter, S. R. ; Mitchell, D. A. ; Morgan, E. ; Oberoi, D. ; Ord, S. M. ; Pathikulangara, J. ; Prabu, T. ; Remillard, R. A. ; Rogers, A. E E ; Roshi, A. ; Salah, J. E. ; Sault, R. J. ; Shankar, N. Udaya ; Srivani, K. S. ; Stevens, J. ; Subrahmanyan, R. ; Tingay, S. J. ; Wayth, R. B. ; Waterson, M. ; Webster, R. L. ; Whitney, A. R. ; Williams, A. ; Williams, C. L. ; Wyithe, J. S B. / A new layout optimization technique for interferometric arrays, applied to the Murchison Widefield Array. In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2012 ; Vol. 425, No. 3. pp. 1781-1788.
@article{8927c6a0992f498aadc09e23bb50fe50,
title = "A new layout optimization technique for interferometric arrays, applied to the Murchison Widefield Array",
abstract = "Antenna layout is an important design consideration for radio interferometers because it determines the quality of the snapshot point spread function (PSF, or array beam). This is particularly true for experiments targeting the 21-cm Epoch of Reionization signal as the quality of the foreground subtraction depends directly on the spatial dynamic range and thus the smoothness of the baseline distribution. Nearly all sites have constraints on where antennas can be placed - even at the remote Australian location of the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) there are rock outcrops, flood zones, heritages areas, emergency runways and trees. These exclusion areas can introduce spatial structure into the baseline distribution that enhances the PSF sidelobes and reduces the angular dynamic range. In this paper we present a new method of constrained antenna placement that reduces the spatial structure in the baseline distribution. This method not only outperforms random placement algorithms that avoid exclusion zones, but surprisingly outperforms random placement algorithms without constraints to provide what we believe are the smoothest constrained baseline distributions developed to date. We use our new algorithm to determine antenna placements for the originally planned MWA, and present the antenna locations, baseline distribution and snapshot PSF for this array choice.",
keywords = "Cosmology: miscellaneous, Instrumentation: interferometers",
author = "Beardsley, {A. P.} and Hazelton, {B. J.} and Morales, {M. F.} and Capallo, {R. J.} and R. Goeke and D. Emrich and Lonsdale, {C. J.} and W. Arcus and D. Barnes and G. Bernardi and Judd Bowman and Bunton, {J. D.} and Corey, {B. E.} and A. Deshpande and L. deSouza and Gaensler, {B. M.} and Greenhill, {L. J.} and D. Herne and Hewitt, {J. N.} and Kaplan, {D. L.} and Kasper, {J. C.} and Kincaid, {B. B.} and R. Koenig and E. Kratzenberg and Lynch, {M. J.} and McWhirter, {S. R.} and Mitchell, {D. A.} and E. Morgan and D. Oberoi and Ord, {S. M.} and J. Pathikulangara and T. Prabu and Remillard, {R. A.} and Rogers, {A. E E} and A. Roshi and Salah, {J. E.} and Sault, {R. J.} and Shankar, {N. Udaya} and Srivani, {K. S.} and J. Stevens and R. Subrahmanyan and Tingay, {S. J.} and Wayth, {R. B.} and M. Waterson and Webster, {R. L.} and Whitney, {A. R.} and A. Williams and Williams, {C. L.} and Wyithe, {J. S B}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20878.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "425",
pages = "1781--1788",
journal = "Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society",
issn = "0035-8711",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new layout optimization technique for interferometric arrays, applied to the Murchison Widefield Array

AU - Beardsley, A. P.

AU - Hazelton, B. J.

AU - Morales, M. F.

AU - Capallo, R. J.

AU - Goeke, R.

AU - Emrich, D.

AU - Lonsdale, C. J.

AU - Arcus, W.

AU - Barnes, D.

AU - Bernardi, G.

AU - Bowman, Judd

AU - Bunton, J. D.

AU - Corey, B. E.

AU - Deshpande, A.

AU - deSouza, L.

AU - Gaensler, B. M.

AU - Greenhill, L. J.

AU - Herne, D.

AU - Hewitt, J. N.

AU - Kaplan, D. L.

AU - Kasper, J. C.

AU - Kincaid, B. B.

AU - Koenig, R.

AU - Kratzenberg, E.

AU - Lynch, M. J.

AU - McWhirter, S. R.

AU - Mitchell, D. A.

AU - Morgan, E.

AU - Oberoi, D.

AU - Ord, S. M.

AU - Pathikulangara, J.

AU - Prabu, T.

AU - Remillard, R. A.

AU - Rogers, A. E E

AU - Roshi, A.

AU - Salah, J. E.

AU - Sault, R. J.

AU - Shankar, N. Udaya

AU - Srivani, K. S.

AU - Stevens, J.

AU - Subrahmanyan, R.

AU - Tingay, S. J.

AU - Wayth, R. B.

AU - Waterson, M.

AU - Webster, R. L.

AU - Whitney, A. R.

AU - Williams, A.

AU - Williams, C. L.

AU - Wyithe, J. S B

PY - 2012/9/21

Y1 - 2012/9/21

N2 - Antenna layout is an important design consideration for radio interferometers because it determines the quality of the snapshot point spread function (PSF, or array beam). This is particularly true for experiments targeting the 21-cm Epoch of Reionization signal as the quality of the foreground subtraction depends directly on the spatial dynamic range and thus the smoothness of the baseline distribution. Nearly all sites have constraints on where antennas can be placed - even at the remote Australian location of the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) there are rock outcrops, flood zones, heritages areas, emergency runways and trees. These exclusion areas can introduce spatial structure into the baseline distribution that enhances the PSF sidelobes and reduces the angular dynamic range. In this paper we present a new method of constrained antenna placement that reduces the spatial structure in the baseline distribution. This method not only outperforms random placement algorithms that avoid exclusion zones, but surprisingly outperforms random placement algorithms without constraints to provide what we believe are the smoothest constrained baseline distributions developed to date. We use our new algorithm to determine antenna placements for the originally planned MWA, and present the antenna locations, baseline distribution and snapshot PSF for this array choice.

AB - Antenna layout is an important design consideration for radio interferometers because it determines the quality of the snapshot point spread function (PSF, or array beam). This is particularly true for experiments targeting the 21-cm Epoch of Reionization signal as the quality of the foreground subtraction depends directly on the spatial dynamic range and thus the smoothness of the baseline distribution. Nearly all sites have constraints on where antennas can be placed - even at the remote Australian location of the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) there are rock outcrops, flood zones, heritages areas, emergency runways and trees. These exclusion areas can introduce spatial structure into the baseline distribution that enhances the PSF sidelobes and reduces the angular dynamic range. In this paper we present a new method of constrained antenna placement that reduces the spatial structure in the baseline distribution. This method not only outperforms random placement algorithms that avoid exclusion zones, but surprisingly outperforms random placement algorithms without constraints to provide what we believe are the smoothest constrained baseline distributions developed to date. We use our new algorithm to determine antenna placements for the originally planned MWA, and present the antenna locations, baseline distribution and snapshot PSF for this array choice.

KW - Cosmology: miscellaneous

KW - Instrumentation: interferometers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865606348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865606348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20878.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20878.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84865606348

VL - 425

SP - 1781

EP - 1788

JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

SN - 0035-8711

IS - 3

ER -