TY - JOUR
T1 - A Multistage Influence Model of Barriers to Group Problem Solving
T2 - A Participant-Generated Agenda for Small Group Research
AU - Broome, Benjamin J.
AU - Fulbright, Luann
PY - 1995/2
Y1 - 1995/2
N2 - Although writers frequently suggestfuture directionsfor small group research, it is not clear to what extent these suggestions arise from participant concerns rather than researcher interests. Not always do the concerns of scholars coincide with the needs of the user. This article presents a participant-generated agendafor small group research that is constructed from a structural analysis of influence maps developed by seven groups overa 6-yearperiod. Each of these groups was engaged in the generation, structuring, and interpretation of difficulties related to group work. A multistage influence model of barriers to group problem solving is developedfrom the group products, and suggestions are made forfuture research directions based on this modeL Thefollowing agenda is proposed: (a) we must examine more carefully the role of contextual influences in group work (b) we need to provide stronger guidance on methodologies for group work, (c) we must find ways to fully integrate discussions of culture with group process, (d) we should view climate and communication as primary conduits of group interaction, (e) we need to conduct more research on how attitudes are influenced by group factors, and (f) we need to broaden our view of the role of process experts.
AB - Although writers frequently suggestfuture directionsfor small group research, it is not clear to what extent these suggestions arise from participant concerns rather than researcher interests. Not always do the concerns of scholars coincide with the needs of the user. This article presents a participant-generated agendafor small group research that is constructed from a structural analysis of influence maps developed by seven groups overa 6-yearperiod. Each of these groups was engaged in the generation, structuring, and interpretation of difficulties related to group work. A multistage influence model of barriers to group problem solving is developedfrom the group products, and suggestions are made forfuture research directions based on this modeL Thefollowing agenda is proposed: (a) we must examine more carefully the role of contextual influences in group work (b) we need to provide stronger guidance on methodologies for group work, (c) we must find ways to fully integrate discussions of culture with group process, (d) we should view climate and communication as primary conduits of group interaction, (e) we need to conduct more research on how attitudes are influenced by group factors, and (f) we need to broaden our view of the role of process experts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970779094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970779094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1046496495261002
DO - 10.1177/1046496495261002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84970779094
SN - 1046-4964
VL - 26
SP - 25
EP - 55
JO - Small Group Research
JF - Small Group Research
IS - 1
ER -