A Multiplist Strategy for Strengthening Nonequivalent Control Group Designs

Kim D. Reynolds, Stephen West

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evaluation researchers are often confronted with less than optimal conditions in which to design studies. When this occurs, researchers may be forced to utilize relatively weak designs that do not rule out all threats to internal validity. Using archival data from a sales campaign for a state lottery, this article illustrates a multiplist strategy (Cook, 1985) in which several complementary designs are utilized to help rule out the four threats to internal validity associated with the frequently utilized nonequivalent control group design. Specific methods for addressing each of these threats and strengthening the basic nonequivalent control groups design are also illustrated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)691-714
Number of pages24
JournalEvaluation Review
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1987

Fingerprint

threat
Group
sales
campaign
evaluation
Strengthening
Control Group
Threat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

A Multiplist Strategy for Strengthening Nonequivalent Control Group Designs. / Reynolds, Kim D.; West, Stephen.

In: Evaluation Review, Vol. 11, No. 6, 1987, p. 691-714.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f1d592c9224c415ebe6a50d6fd271344,
title = "A Multiplist Strategy for Strengthening Nonequivalent Control Group Designs",
abstract = "Evaluation researchers are often confronted with less than optimal conditions in which to design studies. When this occurs, researchers may be forced to utilize relatively weak designs that do not rule out all threats to internal validity. Using archival data from a sales campaign for a state lottery, this article illustrates a multiplist strategy (Cook, 1985) in which several complementary designs are utilized to help rule out the four threats to internal validity associated with the frequently utilized nonequivalent control group design. Specific methods for addressing each of these threats and strengthening the basic nonequivalent control groups design are also illustrated.",
author = "Reynolds, {Kim D.} and Stephen West",
year = "1987",
doi = "10.1177/0193841X8701100601",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "691--714",
journal = "Evaluation Review",
issn = "0193-841X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Multiplist Strategy for Strengthening Nonequivalent Control Group Designs

AU - Reynolds, Kim D.

AU - West, Stephen

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - Evaluation researchers are often confronted with less than optimal conditions in which to design studies. When this occurs, researchers may be forced to utilize relatively weak designs that do not rule out all threats to internal validity. Using archival data from a sales campaign for a state lottery, this article illustrates a multiplist strategy (Cook, 1985) in which several complementary designs are utilized to help rule out the four threats to internal validity associated with the frequently utilized nonequivalent control group design. Specific methods for addressing each of these threats and strengthening the basic nonequivalent control groups design are also illustrated.

AB - Evaluation researchers are often confronted with less than optimal conditions in which to design studies. When this occurs, researchers may be forced to utilize relatively weak designs that do not rule out all threats to internal validity. Using archival data from a sales campaign for a state lottery, this article illustrates a multiplist strategy (Cook, 1985) in which several complementary designs are utilized to help rule out the four threats to internal validity associated with the frequently utilized nonequivalent control group design. Specific methods for addressing each of these threats and strengthening the basic nonequivalent control groups design are also illustrated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973818707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973818707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0193841X8701100601

DO - 10.1177/0193841X8701100601

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84973818707

VL - 11

SP - 691

EP - 714

JO - Evaluation Review

JF - Evaluation Review

SN - 0193-841X

IS - 6

ER -