A multi-site comparison of environmental characteristics to support workplace walking

Nicholas D. Gilson, Barbara Ainsworth, Stuart Biddle, Guy Faulkner, Marie H. Murphy, Ailsa Niven, Andy Pringle, Anna Puig-Ribera, Afroditi Stathi, M. Renée Umstattd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study assessed the environmental characteristics of ten universities, comparing the extent to which physical infra-structures are able to support a route-based walking intervention. Method: Following protocol standardization between and within sites, major pedestrian routes at main suburban campuses in seven countries (Australia, Canada, England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Spain and the United States) were audited by researchers using an established inventory (March-June 2008). The inventory assessed key characteristics (e.g. size and employee number) and nine specific items (pedestrian facilities, vehicle conflicts, crossings, route-maintenance, walkway width, roadway buffer, universal accessibility, aesthetics and cover), scored on a five-point scale (1 = very poor; 5 = excellent). Item scores for each route, were combined and weighted, to provide indicators of low (score of 20-39), fair (score of 40-69), or good (score of 70-100) physical infra-structure support. Results: Sites varied in area (range of 7-1000 acres) and employee numbers (range of 700-7500 employees). Audits reported good support for route-based walking at seven sites (overall route score range = 72.5 ± 13.9-82.2 ± 17.4), fair support at two sites (overall route score of 69.1 ± 11.7 and 61.7 ± 14.6), and low support at one site (overall route score of 22.1 ± 7.3). Conclusions: Study methods highlight a valuable audit process, while findings identify the need to improve aspects of physical infra-structure at sites where the built environment may be less conducive for route-based walking.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-23
Number of pages3
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2009

Fingerprint

Workplace
Walking
Northern Ireland
Equipment and Supplies
Scotland
Esthetics
England
Spain
Canada
Buffers
Maintenance
Research Personnel
Pedestrians
Conflict (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Audit
  • Environment
  • Walking
  • Workplace

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Gilson, N. D., Ainsworth, B., Biddle, S., Faulkner, G., Murphy, M. H., Niven, A., ... Umstattd, M. R. (2009). A multi-site comparison of environmental characteristics to support workplace walking. Preventive Medicine, 49(1), 21-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.05.001

A multi-site comparison of environmental characteristics to support workplace walking. / Gilson, Nicholas D.; Ainsworth, Barbara; Biddle, Stuart; Faulkner, Guy; Murphy, Marie H.; Niven, Ailsa; Pringle, Andy; Puig-Ribera, Anna; Stathi, Afroditi; Umstattd, M. Renée.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 1, 08.2009, p. 21-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gilson, ND, Ainsworth, B, Biddle, S, Faulkner, G, Murphy, MH, Niven, A, Pringle, A, Puig-Ribera, A, Stathi, A & Umstattd, MR 2009, 'A multi-site comparison of environmental characteristics to support workplace walking', Preventive Medicine, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 21-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.05.001
Gilson ND, Ainsworth B, Biddle S, Faulkner G, Murphy MH, Niven A et al. A multi-site comparison of environmental characteristics to support workplace walking. Preventive Medicine. 2009 Aug;49(1):21-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.05.001
Gilson, Nicholas D. ; Ainsworth, Barbara ; Biddle, Stuart ; Faulkner, Guy ; Murphy, Marie H. ; Niven, Ailsa ; Pringle, Andy ; Puig-Ribera, Anna ; Stathi, Afroditi ; Umstattd, M. Renée. / A multi-site comparison of environmental characteristics to support workplace walking. In: Preventive Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 49, No. 1. pp. 21-23.
@article{9682f37600f54c60b3b6f3f32af0b07e,
title = "A multi-site comparison of environmental characteristics to support workplace walking",
abstract = "Objective: This study assessed the environmental characteristics of ten universities, comparing the extent to which physical infra-structures are able to support a route-based walking intervention. Method: Following protocol standardization between and within sites, major pedestrian routes at main suburban campuses in seven countries (Australia, Canada, England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Spain and the United States) were audited by researchers using an established inventory (March-June 2008). The inventory assessed key characteristics (e.g. size and employee number) and nine specific items (pedestrian facilities, vehicle conflicts, crossings, route-maintenance, walkway width, roadway buffer, universal accessibility, aesthetics and cover), scored on a five-point scale (1 = very poor; 5 = excellent). Item scores for each route, were combined and weighted, to provide indicators of low (score of 20-39), fair (score of 40-69), or good (score of 70-100) physical infra-structure support. Results: Sites varied in area (range of 7-1000 acres) and employee numbers (range of 700-7500 employees). Audits reported good support for route-based walking at seven sites (overall route score range = 72.5 ± 13.9-82.2 ± 17.4), fair support at two sites (overall route score of 69.1 ± 11.7 and 61.7 ± 14.6), and low support at one site (overall route score of 22.1 ± 7.3). Conclusions: Study methods highlight a valuable audit process, while findings identify the need to improve aspects of physical infra-structure at sites where the built environment may be less conducive for route-based walking.",
keywords = "Audit, Environment, Walking, Workplace",
author = "Gilson, {Nicholas D.} and Barbara Ainsworth and Stuart Biddle and Guy Faulkner and Murphy, {Marie H.} and Ailsa Niven and Andy Pringle and Anna Puig-Ribera and Afroditi Stathi and Umstattd, {M. Ren{\'e}e}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.05.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "21--23",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multi-site comparison of environmental characteristics to support workplace walking

AU - Gilson, Nicholas D.

AU - Ainsworth, Barbara

AU - Biddle, Stuart

AU - Faulkner, Guy

AU - Murphy, Marie H.

AU - Niven, Ailsa

AU - Pringle, Andy

AU - Puig-Ribera, Anna

AU - Stathi, Afroditi

AU - Umstattd, M. Renée

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - Objective: This study assessed the environmental characteristics of ten universities, comparing the extent to which physical infra-structures are able to support a route-based walking intervention. Method: Following protocol standardization between and within sites, major pedestrian routes at main suburban campuses in seven countries (Australia, Canada, England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Spain and the United States) were audited by researchers using an established inventory (March-June 2008). The inventory assessed key characteristics (e.g. size and employee number) and nine specific items (pedestrian facilities, vehicle conflicts, crossings, route-maintenance, walkway width, roadway buffer, universal accessibility, aesthetics and cover), scored on a five-point scale (1 = very poor; 5 = excellent). Item scores for each route, were combined and weighted, to provide indicators of low (score of 20-39), fair (score of 40-69), or good (score of 70-100) physical infra-structure support. Results: Sites varied in area (range of 7-1000 acres) and employee numbers (range of 700-7500 employees). Audits reported good support for route-based walking at seven sites (overall route score range = 72.5 ± 13.9-82.2 ± 17.4), fair support at two sites (overall route score of 69.1 ± 11.7 and 61.7 ± 14.6), and low support at one site (overall route score of 22.1 ± 7.3). Conclusions: Study methods highlight a valuable audit process, while findings identify the need to improve aspects of physical infra-structure at sites where the built environment may be less conducive for route-based walking.

AB - Objective: This study assessed the environmental characteristics of ten universities, comparing the extent to which physical infra-structures are able to support a route-based walking intervention. Method: Following protocol standardization between and within sites, major pedestrian routes at main suburban campuses in seven countries (Australia, Canada, England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Spain and the United States) were audited by researchers using an established inventory (March-June 2008). The inventory assessed key characteristics (e.g. size and employee number) and nine specific items (pedestrian facilities, vehicle conflicts, crossings, route-maintenance, walkway width, roadway buffer, universal accessibility, aesthetics and cover), scored on a five-point scale (1 = very poor; 5 = excellent). Item scores for each route, were combined and weighted, to provide indicators of low (score of 20-39), fair (score of 40-69), or good (score of 70-100) physical infra-structure support. Results: Sites varied in area (range of 7-1000 acres) and employee numbers (range of 700-7500 employees). Audits reported good support for route-based walking at seven sites (overall route score range = 72.5 ± 13.9-82.2 ± 17.4), fair support at two sites (overall route score of 69.1 ± 11.7 and 61.7 ± 14.6), and low support at one site (overall route score of 22.1 ± 7.3). Conclusions: Study methods highlight a valuable audit process, while findings identify the need to improve aspects of physical infra-structure at sites where the built environment may be less conducive for route-based walking.

KW - Audit

KW - Environment

KW - Walking

KW - Workplace

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650690671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650690671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.05.001

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 21

EP - 23

JO - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

IS - 1

ER -