A Multi-Level Analysis of the Upper-Echelons Model

Albert A. Cannella, Tim R. Holcomb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The upper-echelons model of Hambrick and Mason ((1984). Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206) launched a new area of research and provided the first overall theoretical framework for use in understanding how the experiences, backgrounds, and values of senior executives in organizations can influence the decisions that they make. The model is typically assumed to be what Rousseau ((1985). In: B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cumming (Eds), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 1-37). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press) calls "multi-level," as it describes how both individuals and top management teams (TMTs) make decisions in line with their preferences, biases, and values; the same model is applicable to both individuals and groups. However, the levels issues in the model have never been subjected to rigorous analysis. This chapter juxtaposes levels concepts and theories on the upper-echelons model, in an effort to highlight its strengths as well as its weaknesses. While the majority of researchers use the model to describe team-level decision making, the analysis presented here reveals that the model is inherently individual-level in focus, and several important limitations must be overcome before the model will provide a full explanation of team-level decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-237
Number of pages43
JournalResearch in Multi-Level Issues
Volume4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Upper echelons
Multilevel analysis
Decision making
Organizational behaviour
Top management teams
Theoretical framework

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Cite this

A Multi-Level Analysis of the Upper-Echelons Model. / Cannella, Albert A.; Holcomb, Tim R.

In: Research in Multi-Level Issues, Vol. 4, 2005, p. 195-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cannella, Albert A. ; Holcomb, Tim R. / A Multi-Level Analysis of the Upper-Echelons Model. In: Research in Multi-Level Issues. 2005 ; Vol. 4. pp. 195-237.
@article{886e4e9a49354513915b363f0bef4211,
title = "A Multi-Level Analysis of the Upper-Echelons Model",
abstract = "The upper-echelons model of Hambrick and Mason ((1984). Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206) launched a new area of research and provided the first overall theoretical framework for use in understanding how the experiences, backgrounds, and values of senior executives in organizations can influence the decisions that they make. The model is typically assumed to be what Rousseau ((1985). In: B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cumming (Eds), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 1-37). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press) calls {"}multi-level,{"} as it describes how both individuals and top management teams (TMTs) make decisions in line with their preferences, biases, and values; the same model is applicable to both individuals and groups. However, the levels issues in the model have never been subjected to rigorous analysis. This chapter juxtaposes levels concepts and theories on the upper-echelons model, in an effort to highlight its strengths as well as its weaknesses. While the majority of researchers use the model to describe team-level decision making, the analysis presented here reveals that the model is inherently individual-level in focus, and several important limitations must be overcome before the model will provide a full explanation of team-level decision making.",
author = "Cannella, {Albert A.} and Holcomb, {Tim R.}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04009-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "195--237",
journal = "Research in Multi-Level Issues",
issn = "1475-9144",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Multi-Level Analysis of the Upper-Echelons Model

AU - Cannella, Albert A.

AU - Holcomb, Tim R.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The upper-echelons model of Hambrick and Mason ((1984). Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206) launched a new area of research and provided the first overall theoretical framework for use in understanding how the experiences, backgrounds, and values of senior executives in organizations can influence the decisions that they make. The model is typically assumed to be what Rousseau ((1985). In: B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cumming (Eds), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 1-37). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press) calls "multi-level," as it describes how both individuals and top management teams (TMTs) make decisions in line with their preferences, biases, and values; the same model is applicable to both individuals and groups. However, the levels issues in the model have never been subjected to rigorous analysis. This chapter juxtaposes levels concepts and theories on the upper-echelons model, in an effort to highlight its strengths as well as its weaknesses. While the majority of researchers use the model to describe team-level decision making, the analysis presented here reveals that the model is inherently individual-level in focus, and several important limitations must be overcome before the model will provide a full explanation of team-level decision making.

AB - The upper-echelons model of Hambrick and Mason ((1984). Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206) launched a new area of research and provided the first overall theoretical framework for use in understanding how the experiences, backgrounds, and values of senior executives in organizations can influence the decisions that they make. The model is typically assumed to be what Rousseau ((1985). In: B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cumming (Eds), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 1-37). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press) calls "multi-level," as it describes how both individuals and top management teams (TMTs) make decisions in line with their preferences, biases, and values; the same model is applicable to both individuals and groups. However, the levels issues in the model have never been subjected to rigorous analysis. This chapter juxtaposes levels concepts and theories on the upper-echelons model, in an effort to highlight its strengths as well as its weaknesses. While the majority of researchers use the model to describe team-level decision making, the analysis presented here reveals that the model is inherently individual-level in focus, and several important limitations must be overcome before the model will provide a full explanation of team-level decision making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645880132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645880132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04009-9

DO - 10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04009-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33645880132

VL - 4

SP - 195

EP - 237

JO - Research in Multi-Level Issues

JF - Research in Multi-Level Issues

SN - 1475-9144

ER -