Abstract

This paper compares the performance of commercial interground Portland-limestone cements (PLC) to those of blended limestone systems. Limestone of four different median sizes is mixed with ordinary portland cement (OPC) to create blends in an attempt to match the particle size distribution of the PLCs. The interground systems are found to outperform the blended systems, plausibly because of the difference in size distributions of the clinker and limestone fractions between the PLCs and the blended systems. A novel methodology to extract the particle size distributions of the components in the interground systems is reported. This method, applicable for several types of multi-component powder systems, considers Rosin-Rammler size distributions for the ground clinker and limestone, and optimizes the parameters of the distribution to obtain a composite distribution of the same fineness as the interground system. The model is verified using a cement hydration and microstructure model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)328-337
Number of pages10
JournalConstruction and Building Materials
Volume121
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 15 2016

Fingerprint

Calcium Carbonate
Limestone
Cements
Composite materials
Programmable logic controllers
Particle size analysis
Portland cement
Hydration
Powders
Microstructure

Keywords

  • Blended
  • CEMHYD3D
  • Hydration
  • Interground
  • Limestone
  • Pore structure
  • Rosin-Rammler distribution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

A methodology to extract the component size distributions in interground composite (limestone) cements. / Arora, Aashay; Vance, Kirk; Sant, Gaurav; Neithalath, Narayanan.

In: Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 121, 15.09.2016, p. 328-337.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6d77f4ea446f4437bcfb89e86547b08f,
title = "A methodology to extract the component size distributions in interground composite (limestone) cements",
abstract = "This paper compares the performance of commercial interground Portland-limestone cements (PLC) to those of blended limestone systems. Limestone of four different median sizes is mixed with ordinary portland cement (OPC) to create blends in an attempt to match the particle size distribution of the PLCs. The interground systems are found to outperform the blended systems, plausibly because of the difference in size distributions of the clinker and limestone fractions between the PLCs and the blended systems. A novel methodology to extract the particle size distributions of the components in the interground systems is reported. This method, applicable for several types of multi-component powder systems, considers Rosin-Rammler size distributions for the ground clinker and limestone, and optimizes the parameters of the distribution to obtain a composite distribution of the same fineness as the interground system. The model is verified using a cement hydration and microstructure model.",
keywords = "Blended, CEMHYD3D, Hydration, Interground, Limestone, Pore structure, Rosin-Rammler distribution",
author = "Aashay Arora and Kirk Vance and Gaurav Sant and Narayanan Neithalath",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "121",
pages = "328--337",
journal = "Construction and Building Materials",
issn = "0950-0618",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A methodology to extract the component size distributions in interground composite (limestone) cements

AU - Arora, Aashay

AU - Vance, Kirk

AU - Sant, Gaurav

AU - Neithalath, Narayanan

PY - 2016/9/15

Y1 - 2016/9/15

N2 - This paper compares the performance of commercial interground Portland-limestone cements (PLC) to those of blended limestone systems. Limestone of four different median sizes is mixed with ordinary portland cement (OPC) to create blends in an attempt to match the particle size distribution of the PLCs. The interground systems are found to outperform the blended systems, plausibly because of the difference in size distributions of the clinker and limestone fractions between the PLCs and the blended systems. A novel methodology to extract the particle size distributions of the components in the interground systems is reported. This method, applicable for several types of multi-component powder systems, considers Rosin-Rammler size distributions for the ground clinker and limestone, and optimizes the parameters of the distribution to obtain a composite distribution of the same fineness as the interground system. The model is verified using a cement hydration and microstructure model.

AB - This paper compares the performance of commercial interground Portland-limestone cements (PLC) to those of blended limestone systems. Limestone of four different median sizes is mixed with ordinary portland cement (OPC) to create blends in an attempt to match the particle size distribution of the PLCs. The interground systems are found to outperform the blended systems, plausibly because of the difference in size distributions of the clinker and limestone fractions between the PLCs and the blended systems. A novel methodology to extract the particle size distributions of the components in the interground systems is reported. This method, applicable for several types of multi-component powder systems, considers Rosin-Rammler size distributions for the ground clinker and limestone, and optimizes the parameters of the distribution to obtain a composite distribution of the same fineness as the interground system. The model is verified using a cement hydration and microstructure model.

KW - Blended

KW - CEMHYD3D

KW - Hydration

KW - Interground

KW - Limestone

KW - Pore structure

KW - Rosin-Rammler distribution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975468787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975468787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.006

DO - 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84975468787

VL - 121

SP - 328

EP - 337

JO - Construction and Building Materials

JF - Construction and Building Materials

SN - 0950-0618

ER -