A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Adolescent Students

Stephen Graham, Dolores Perin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

565 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is considerable concern that the majority of adolescents do not develop the competence in writing they need to be successful in school, the workplace, or their personal lives. A common explanation for why youngsters do not write well is that schools do not do a good job of teaching this complex skill. In an effort to identify effective instructional practices for teaching writing to adolescents, the authors conducted a meta-analysis of the writing intervention literature (Grades 4-12), focusing their efforts on experimental and quasi-experimental studies. They located 123 documents that yielded 154 effect sizes for quality of writing. The authors calculated an average weighted effect size (presented in parentheses) for the following 11 interventions: strategy instruction (0.82), summarization (0.82), peer assistance (0.75), setting product goals (0.70), word processing (0.55), sentence combining (0.50), inquiry (0.32), prewriting activities (0.32), process writing approach (0.32), study of models (0.25), grammar instruction (-0.32).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)445-476
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Educational Psychology
Volume99
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

writing instruction
Meta-Analysis
Students
adolescent
student
Teaching
instruction
Word Processing
intervention strategy
Workplace
Mental Competency
school
grammar
assistance
workplace
school grade

Keywords

  • adolescents
  • composition
  • instruction
  • meta-analysis
  • writing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Adolescent Students. / Graham, Stephen; Perin, Dolores.

In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 99, No. 3, 08.2007, p. 445-476.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{04ce4b872bc74b2b92b42840a9018c03,
title = "A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Adolescent Students",
abstract = "There is considerable concern that the majority of adolescents do not develop the competence in writing they need to be successful in school, the workplace, or their personal lives. A common explanation for why youngsters do not write well is that schools do not do a good job of teaching this complex skill. In an effort to identify effective instructional practices for teaching writing to adolescents, the authors conducted a meta-analysis of the writing intervention literature (Grades 4-12), focusing their efforts on experimental and quasi-experimental studies. They located 123 documents that yielded 154 effect sizes for quality of writing. The authors calculated an average weighted effect size (presented in parentheses) for the following 11 interventions: strategy instruction (0.82), summarization (0.82), peer assistance (0.75), setting product goals (0.70), word processing (0.55), sentence combining (0.50), inquiry (0.32), prewriting activities (0.32), process writing approach (0.32), study of models (0.25), grammar instruction (-0.32).",
keywords = "adolescents, composition, instruction, meta-analysis, writing",
author = "Stephen Graham and Dolores Perin",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
pages = "445--476",
journal = "Journal of Educational Psychology",
issn = "0022-0663",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Adolescent Students

AU - Graham, Stephen

AU - Perin, Dolores

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - There is considerable concern that the majority of adolescents do not develop the competence in writing they need to be successful in school, the workplace, or their personal lives. A common explanation for why youngsters do not write well is that schools do not do a good job of teaching this complex skill. In an effort to identify effective instructional practices for teaching writing to adolescents, the authors conducted a meta-analysis of the writing intervention literature (Grades 4-12), focusing their efforts on experimental and quasi-experimental studies. They located 123 documents that yielded 154 effect sizes for quality of writing. The authors calculated an average weighted effect size (presented in parentheses) for the following 11 interventions: strategy instruction (0.82), summarization (0.82), peer assistance (0.75), setting product goals (0.70), word processing (0.55), sentence combining (0.50), inquiry (0.32), prewriting activities (0.32), process writing approach (0.32), study of models (0.25), grammar instruction (-0.32).

AB - There is considerable concern that the majority of adolescents do not develop the competence in writing they need to be successful in school, the workplace, or their personal lives. A common explanation for why youngsters do not write well is that schools do not do a good job of teaching this complex skill. In an effort to identify effective instructional practices for teaching writing to adolescents, the authors conducted a meta-analysis of the writing intervention literature (Grades 4-12), focusing their efforts on experimental and quasi-experimental studies. They located 123 documents that yielded 154 effect sizes for quality of writing. The authors calculated an average weighted effect size (presented in parentheses) for the following 11 interventions: strategy instruction (0.82), summarization (0.82), peer assistance (0.75), setting product goals (0.70), word processing (0.55), sentence combining (0.50), inquiry (0.32), prewriting activities (0.32), process writing approach (0.32), study of models (0.25), grammar instruction (-0.32).

KW - adolescents

KW - composition

KW - instruction

KW - meta-analysis

KW - writing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548845023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548845023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445

DO - 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34548845023

VL - 99

SP - 445

EP - 476

JO - Journal of Educational Psychology

JF - Journal of Educational Psychology

SN - 0022-0663

IS - 3

ER -