A meta-analysis of the effects of jury size

Michael Saks, Mollie Weighner Marti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a series of opinions in the 1970s, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that juries smaller than 12 persons would be constitutional if they performed no differently than traditional 12-person juries. In a meta-analysis, we examined the effects of jury size on the criteria the court specified as the basis for making such comparisons. A search for all relevant empirical studies identified 17 that examined differences between 6- and 12-member juries. The total sample for the 17 studies was 2,061 juries involving some 15,000 individual jurors. Among other findings, it appears that larger juries are more likely than smaller juries to contain members of minority groups, deliberate longer, hang more often, and possibly recall trial testimony more accurately.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)451-467
Number of pages17
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Minority Groups
human being
testimony
Supreme Court
minority
Group
Juries
Meta-analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

A meta-analysis of the effects of jury size. / Saks, Michael; Marti, Mollie Weighner.

In: Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 21, No. 5, 1997, p. 451-467.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Saks, Michael ; Marti, Mollie Weighner. / A meta-analysis of the effects of jury size. In: Law and Human Behavior. 1997 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 451-467.
@article{04491e7430174e4690717f41661f5330,
title = "A meta-analysis of the effects of jury size",
abstract = "In a series of opinions in the 1970s, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that juries smaller than 12 persons would be constitutional if they performed no differently than traditional 12-person juries. In a meta-analysis, we examined the effects of jury size on the criteria the court specified as the basis for making such comparisons. A search for all relevant empirical studies identified 17 that examined differences between 6- and 12-member juries. The total sample for the 17 studies was 2,061 juries involving some 15,000 individual jurors. Among other findings, it appears that larger juries are more likely than smaller juries to contain members of minority groups, deliberate longer, hang more often, and possibly recall trial testimony more accurately.",
author = "Michael Saks and Marti, {Mollie Weighner}",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1023/A:1024819605652",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "451--467",
journal = "Law and Human Behavior",
issn = "0147-7307",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta-analysis of the effects of jury size

AU - Saks, Michael

AU - Marti, Mollie Weighner

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - In a series of opinions in the 1970s, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that juries smaller than 12 persons would be constitutional if they performed no differently than traditional 12-person juries. In a meta-analysis, we examined the effects of jury size on the criteria the court specified as the basis for making such comparisons. A search for all relevant empirical studies identified 17 that examined differences between 6- and 12-member juries. The total sample for the 17 studies was 2,061 juries involving some 15,000 individual jurors. Among other findings, it appears that larger juries are more likely than smaller juries to contain members of minority groups, deliberate longer, hang more often, and possibly recall trial testimony more accurately.

AB - In a series of opinions in the 1970s, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that juries smaller than 12 persons would be constitutional if they performed no differently than traditional 12-person juries. In a meta-analysis, we examined the effects of jury size on the criteria the court specified as the basis for making such comparisons. A search for all relevant empirical studies identified 17 that examined differences between 6- and 12-member juries. The total sample for the 17 studies was 2,061 juries involving some 15,000 individual jurors. Among other findings, it appears that larger juries are more likely than smaller juries to contain members of minority groups, deliberate longer, hang more often, and possibly recall trial testimony more accurately.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030840178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030840178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1024819605652

DO - 10.1023/A:1024819605652

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 451

EP - 467

JO - Law and Human Behavior

JF - Law and Human Behavior

SN - 0147-7307

IS - 5

ER -