A look at representative templates for professionally oriented faculty reward systems in other service professions

Gary R. Bertoline; Dennis R. Depew; Michael J. Dyrenfurth; Albert McHenry; Eugene M. DeLoatch; Peter Y. Lee; Duane D. Dunlap; Stephen J. Tricamo; Donald A. Keating; Thomas G. Stanford

A look at representative templates for professionally oriented faculty reward systems in other service professions

Gary R. Bertoline, Dennis R. Depew, Michael J. Dyrenfurth, Albert McHenry, Eugene M. DeLoatch, Peter Y. Lee, Duane D. Dunlap, Stephen J. Tricamo, Donald A. Keating, Thomas G. Stanford

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

This is the second of three papers prepared for a special panel session of the National Collaborative Task Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform that addresses the need for reform of faculty reward systems to advance professional education for creative engineering practice and technology leadership. This paper examines representative templates for professionally oriented faculty reward systems in other service professions in order to identify the commonality which should be reflected any faculty reward system for professional engineering education. As a result, three unifying themes among other professions have emerged which address teaching, professional scholarship, and service/engagement in practice.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	9837-9839
Number of pages	3
Journal	ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
State	Published - 2005
Event	2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: The Changing Landscape of Engineering and Technology Education in a Global World - Portland, OR, United States Duration: Jun 12 2005 → Jun 15 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Engineering(all)

Cite this

@article{726d46160c4441cc83757d1d493b97fd,

title = "A look at representative templates for professionally oriented faculty reward systems in other service professions",

abstract = "This is the second of three papers prepared for a special panel session of the National Collaborative Task Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform that addresses the need for reform of faculty reward systems to advance professional education for creative engineering practice and technology leadership. This paper examines representative templates for professionally oriented faculty reward systems in other service professions in order to identify the commonality which should be reflected any faculty reward system for professional engineering education. As a result, three unifying themes among other professions have emerged which address teaching, professional scholarship, and service/engagement in practice.",

author = "Bertoline, {Gary R.} and Depew, {Dennis R.} and Dyrenfurth, {Michael J.} and Albert McHenry and DeLoatch, {Eugene M.} and Lee, {Peter Y.} and Dunlap, {Duane D.} and Tricamo, {Stephen J.} and Keating, {Donald A.} and Stanford, {Thomas G.}",

year = "2005",

language = "English (US)",

pages = "9837--9839",

journal = "ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings",

issn = "2153-5965",

note = "2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: The Changing Landscape of Engineering and Technology Education in a Global World ; Conference date: 12-06-2005 Through 15-06-2005",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A look at representative templates for professionally oriented faculty reward systems in other service professions

AU - Bertoline, Gary R.

AU - Depew, Dennis R.

AU - Dyrenfurth, Michael J.

AU - McHenry, Albert

AU - DeLoatch, Eugene M.

AU - Lee, Peter Y.

AU - Dunlap, Duane D.

AU - Tricamo, Stephen J.

AU - Keating, Donald A.

AU - Stanford, Thomas G.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This is the second of three papers prepared for a special panel session of the National Collaborative Task Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform that addresses the need for reform of faculty reward systems to advance professional education for creative engineering practice and technology leadership. This paper examines representative templates for professionally oriented faculty reward systems in other service professions in order to identify the commonality which should be reflected any faculty reward system for professional engineering education. As a result, three unifying themes among other professions have emerged which address teaching, professional scholarship, and service/engagement in practice.

AB - This is the second of three papers prepared for a special panel session of the National Collaborative Task Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform that addresses the need for reform of faculty reward systems to advance professional education for creative engineering practice and technology leadership. This paper examines representative templates for professionally oriented faculty reward systems in other service professions in order to identify the commonality which should be reflected any faculty reward system for professional engineering education. As a result, three unifying themes among other professions have emerged which address teaching, professional scholarship, and service/engagement in practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22544477598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22544477598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:22544477598

SN - 2153-5965

SP - 9837

EP - 9839

JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

T2 - 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: The Changing Landscape of Engineering and Technology Education in a Global World

Y2 - 12 June 2005 through 15 June 2005

ER -

A look at representative templates for professionally oriented faculty reward systems in other service professions

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this