A look at representative templates for professionally oriented faculty reward systems in other service professions

Gary R. Bertoline, Dennis R. Depew, Michael J. Dyrenfurth, Albert McHenry, Eugene M. DeLoatch, Peter Y. Lee, Duane D. Dunlap, Stephen J. Tricamo, Donald A. Keating, Thomas G. Stanford

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

This is the second of three papers prepared for a special panel session of the National Collaborative Task Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform that addresses the need for reform of faculty reward systems to advance professional education for creative engineering practice and technology leadership. This paper examines representative templates for professionally oriented faculty reward systems in other service professions in order to identify the commonality which should be reflected any faculty reward system for professional engineering education. As a result, three unifying themes among other professions have emerged which address teaching, professional scholarship, and service/engagement in practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9837-9839
Number of pages3
JournalASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
StatePublished - 2005
Event2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: The Changing Landscape of Engineering and Technology Education in a Global World - Portland, OR, United States
Duration: Jun 12 2005Jun 15 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A look at representative templates for professionally oriented faculty reward systems in other service professions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this