A legal perspective on university technology transfer

Christopher Hayter, Jacob H. Rooksby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the thirty-five years after passage of the Bayh–Dole Act of 1980, a robust literature has documented the emergence of university technology transfer as a critical mechanism for the dissemination and commercialization of new technology stemming from federally-funded research. Missing from these investigations, however, is what this paper terms the legal perspective, an understanding of how the law and its attendant mechanisms impact university technology transfer. Specifically, the paper reviews the extant legal scholarship and provides examples of how case law, legal structures, and the unique nature of intellectual property law affects technology transfer, as well as higher education policy and management. Throughout, we propose critical questions for future investigation, which serve to form a cross-disciplinary research agenda that can contribute fresh insights to scholarly and policy discussions related to the role of universities in economic and social development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Technology Transfer
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Sep 4 2015

Fingerprint

Technology transfer
Intellectual property
Education
Economics
University technology transfer

Keywords

  • Bayh–Dole
  • Law
  • Legal research
  • Patents
  • Technology transfer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Accounting
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

A legal perspective on university technology transfer. / Hayter, Christopher; Rooksby, Jacob H.

In: Journal of Technology Transfer, 04.09.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{88b120cac96a41a1ad75ac3150450bd5,
title = "A legal perspective on university technology transfer",
abstract = "In the thirty-five years after passage of the Bayh–Dole Act of 1980, a robust literature has documented the emergence of university technology transfer as a critical mechanism for the dissemination and commercialization of new technology stemming from federally-funded research. Missing from these investigations, however, is what this paper terms the legal perspective, an understanding of how the law and its attendant mechanisms impact university technology transfer. Specifically, the paper reviews the extant legal scholarship and provides examples of how case law, legal structures, and the unique nature of intellectual property law affects technology transfer, as well as higher education policy and management. Throughout, we propose critical questions for future investigation, which serve to form a cross-disciplinary research agenda that can contribute fresh insights to scholarly and policy discussions related to the role of universities in economic and social development.",
keywords = "Bayh–Dole, Law, Legal research, Patents, Technology transfer",
author = "Christopher Hayter and Rooksby, {Jacob H.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s10961-015-9436-5",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Technology Transfer",
issn = "0892-9912",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A legal perspective on university technology transfer

AU - Hayter, Christopher

AU - Rooksby, Jacob H.

PY - 2015/9/4

Y1 - 2015/9/4

N2 - In the thirty-five years after passage of the Bayh–Dole Act of 1980, a robust literature has documented the emergence of university technology transfer as a critical mechanism for the dissemination and commercialization of new technology stemming from federally-funded research. Missing from these investigations, however, is what this paper terms the legal perspective, an understanding of how the law and its attendant mechanisms impact university technology transfer. Specifically, the paper reviews the extant legal scholarship and provides examples of how case law, legal structures, and the unique nature of intellectual property law affects technology transfer, as well as higher education policy and management. Throughout, we propose critical questions for future investigation, which serve to form a cross-disciplinary research agenda that can contribute fresh insights to scholarly and policy discussions related to the role of universities in economic and social development.

AB - In the thirty-five years after passage of the Bayh–Dole Act of 1980, a robust literature has documented the emergence of university technology transfer as a critical mechanism for the dissemination and commercialization of new technology stemming from federally-funded research. Missing from these investigations, however, is what this paper terms the legal perspective, an understanding of how the law and its attendant mechanisms impact university technology transfer. Specifically, the paper reviews the extant legal scholarship and provides examples of how case law, legal structures, and the unique nature of intellectual property law affects technology transfer, as well as higher education policy and management. Throughout, we propose critical questions for future investigation, which serve to form a cross-disciplinary research agenda that can contribute fresh insights to scholarly and policy discussions related to the role of universities in economic and social development.

KW - Bayh–Dole

KW - Law

KW - Legal research

KW - Patents

KW - Technology transfer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940850178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940850178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10961-015-9436-5

DO - 10.1007/s10961-015-9436-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84940850178

JO - Journal of Technology Transfer

JF - Journal of Technology Transfer

SN - 0892-9912

ER -