Abstract

In microbial fuel cells and electrolysis cells (MXCs), anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) oxidize organic substrates to produce electrical current. In order to develop an electrical current, ARB must transfer electrons to a solid anode through extracellular electron transfer (EET). ARB use various EET mechanisms to transfer electrons to the anode, including direct contact through outer-membrane proteins, diffusion of soluble electron shuttles, and electron transport through solid components of the extracellular biofilm matrix. In this review, we perform a novel kinetic analysis of each EET mechanism by analyzing the results available in the literature. Our goal is to evaluate how well each EET mechanism can produce a high current density (>10 A m-2) without a large anode potential loss (less than a few hundred millivolts), which are feasibility goals of MXCs. Direct contact of ARB to the anode cannot achieve high current densities due to the limited number of cells that can come in direct contact with the anode. Slow diffusive flux of electron shuttles at commonly observed concentrations limits current generation and results in high potential losses, as has been observed experimentally. Only electron transport through a solid conductive matrix can explain observations of high current densities and low anode potential losses. Thus, a study of the biological components that create a solid conductive matrix is of critical importance for understanding the function of ARB.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-17
Number of pages15
JournalFEMS Microbiology Reviews
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Electrodes
Electrons
Bacteria
Electron Transport
Bioelectric Energy Sources
Electrolysis
Biofilms
Extracellular Matrix
Membrane Proteins
Cell Count

Keywords

  • Electron shuttles
  • Microbial electrolysis cells
  • Microbial fuel cells
  • Microbial nanowires
  • Nernst-Monod kinetics
  • Solid conductive matrix

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

A kinetic perspective on extracellular electron transfer by anode-respiring bacteria. / Torres, Cesar; Marcus, Andrew; Lee, Hyung Sool; Parameswaran, Prathap; Krajmalnik-Brown, Rosa; Rittmann, Bruce.

In: FEMS Microbiology Reviews, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 3-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{46a97f4d29dc400688808692877f6726,
title = "A kinetic perspective on extracellular electron transfer by anode-respiring bacteria",
abstract = "In microbial fuel cells and electrolysis cells (MXCs), anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) oxidize organic substrates to produce electrical current. In order to develop an electrical current, ARB must transfer electrons to a solid anode through extracellular electron transfer (EET). ARB use various EET mechanisms to transfer electrons to the anode, including direct contact through outer-membrane proteins, diffusion of soluble electron shuttles, and electron transport through solid components of the extracellular biofilm matrix. In this review, we perform a novel kinetic analysis of each EET mechanism by analyzing the results available in the literature. Our goal is to evaluate how well each EET mechanism can produce a high current density (>10 A m-2) without a large anode potential loss (less than a few hundred millivolts), which are feasibility goals of MXCs. Direct contact of ARB to the anode cannot achieve high current densities due to the limited number of cells that can come in direct contact with the anode. Slow diffusive flux of electron shuttles at commonly observed concentrations limits current generation and results in high potential losses, as has been observed experimentally. Only electron transport through a solid conductive matrix can explain observations of high current densities and low anode potential losses. Thus, a study of the biological components that create a solid conductive matrix is of critical importance for understanding the function of ARB.",
keywords = "Electron shuttles, Microbial electrolysis cells, Microbial fuel cells, Microbial nanowires, Nernst-Monod kinetics, Solid conductive matrix",
author = "Cesar Torres and Andrew Marcus and Lee, {Hyung Sool} and Prathap Parameswaran and Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown and Bruce Rittmann",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00191.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "3--17",
journal = "FEMS Microbiology Reviews",
issn = "0168-6445",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A kinetic perspective on extracellular electron transfer by anode-respiring bacteria

AU - Torres, Cesar

AU - Marcus, Andrew

AU - Lee, Hyung Sool

AU - Parameswaran, Prathap

AU - Krajmalnik-Brown, Rosa

AU - Rittmann, Bruce

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - In microbial fuel cells and electrolysis cells (MXCs), anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) oxidize organic substrates to produce electrical current. In order to develop an electrical current, ARB must transfer electrons to a solid anode through extracellular electron transfer (EET). ARB use various EET mechanisms to transfer electrons to the anode, including direct contact through outer-membrane proteins, diffusion of soluble electron shuttles, and electron transport through solid components of the extracellular biofilm matrix. In this review, we perform a novel kinetic analysis of each EET mechanism by analyzing the results available in the literature. Our goal is to evaluate how well each EET mechanism can produce a high current density (>10 A m-2) without a large anode potential loss (less than a few hundred millivolts), which are feasibility goals of MXCs. Direct contact of ARB to the anode cannot achieve high current densities due to the limited number of cells that can come in direct contact with the anode. Slow diffusive flux of electron shuttles at commonly observed concentrations limits current generation and results in high potential losses, as has been observed experimentally. Only electron transport through a solid conductive matrix can explain observations of high current densities and low anode potential losses. Thus, a study of the biological components that create a solid conductive matrix is of critical importance for understanding the function of ARB.

AB - In microbial fuel cells and electrolysis cells (MXCs), anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) oxidize organic substrates to produce electrical current. In order to develop an electrical current, ARB must transfer electrons to a solid anode through extracellular electron transfer (EET). ARB use various EET mechanisms to transfer electrons to the anode, including direct contact through outer-membrane proteins, diffusion of soluble electron shuttles, and electron transport through solid components of the extracellular biofilm matrix. In this review, we perform a novel kinetic analysis of each EET mechanism by analyzing the results available in the literature. Our goal is to evaluate how well each EET mechanism can produce a high current density (>10 A m-2) without a large anode potential loss (less than a few hundred millivolts), which are feasibility goals of MXCs. Direct contact of ARB to the anode cannot achieve high current densities due to the limited number of cells that can come in direct contact with the anode. Slow diffusive flux of electron shuttles at commonly observed concentrations limits current generation and results in high potential losses, as has been observed experimentally. Only electron transport through a solid conductive matrix can explain observations of high current densities and low anode potential losses. Thus, a study of the biological components that create a solid conductive matrix is of critical importance for understanding the function of ARB.

KW - Electron shuttles

KW - Microbial electrolysis cells

KW - Microbial fuel cells

KW - Microbial nanowires

KW - Nernst-Monod kinetics

KW - Solid conductive matrix

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71549170875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71549170875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00191.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00191.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19895647

AN - SCOPUS:71549170875

VL - 34

SP - 3

EP - 17

JO - FEMS Microbiology Reviews

JF - FEMS Microbiology Reviews

SN - 0168-6445

IS - 1

ER -