A Honeybee's Ability to Learn, Recognize, and Discriminate Odors Depends Upon Odor Sampling Time and Concentration

Geraldine A. Wright, Michelle Carlton, Brian Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Animals sample sensory stimuli for longer periods when they must perform difficult discrimination tasks, implying that the brain's ability to represent stimuli improves as a function of time. Although it is true in other senses, few studies have examined whether increasing sampling time improves olfactory discrimination. In the experiments reported here, odor sampling time was controlled with the goal of testing whether odor concentration affected a honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and discriminate odors. Increasing sampling time during conditioning and testing improved a honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and differentiate low-concentration (0.0002 M) odors. For intermediate-concentration (0.02 M) odors, both acquisition and recognition improved when stimulus duration was longer, but discrimination was unaffected. Having longer to sample a high-concentration (2.0 M) stimulus also improved acquisition, but it did not affect the ability to recognize or differentiate odors. Differences in time to respond to the conditioned and novel odors during the test period depended on the difficulty of the discrimination task. The results suggest that the sensory coding of molecular identity takes longer for low-concentration odors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)36-43
Number of pages8
JournalBehavioral Neuroscience
Volume123
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Odorants
Brain

Keywords

  • antennal lobe
  • honeybee
  • olfaction
  • speed-accuracy trade-off
  • temporal coding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

A Honeybee's Ability to Learn, Recognize, and Discriminate Odors Depends Upon Odor Sampling Time and Concentration. / Wright, Geraldine A.; Carlton, Michelle; Smith, Brian.

In: Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 123, No. 1, 02.2009, p. 36-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b0ea031e2d21435f8b7e0838a98df82f,
title = "A Honeybee's Ability to Learn, Recognize, and Discriminate Odors Depends Upon Odor Sampling Time and Concentration",
abstract = "Animals sample sensory stimuli for longer periods when they must perform difficult discrimination tasks, implying that the brain's ability to represent stimuli improves as a function of time. Although it is true in other senses, few studies have examined whether increasing sampling time improves olfactory discrimination. In the experiments reported here, odor sampling time was controlled with the goal of testing whether odor concentration affected a honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and discriminate odors. Increasing sampling time during conditioning and testing improved a honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and differentiate low-concentration (0.0002 M) odors. For intermediate-concentration (0.02 M) odors, both acquisition and recognition improved when stimulus duration was longer, but discrimination was unaffected. Having longer to sample a high-concentration (2.0 M) stimulus also improved acquisition, but it did not affect the ability to recognize or differentiate odors. Differences in time to respond to the conditioned and novel odors during the test period depended on the difficulty of the discrimination task. The results suggest that the sensory coding of molecular identity takes longer for low-concentration odors.",
keywords = "antennal lobe, honeybee, olfaction, speed-accuracy trade-off, temporal coding",
author = "Wright, {Geraldine A.} and Michelle Carlton and Brian Smith",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1037/a0014040",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "123",
pages = "36--43",
journal = "Behavioral Neuroscience",
issn = "0735-7044",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Honeybee's Ability to Learn, Recognize, and Discriminate Odors Depends Upon Odor Sampling Time and Concentration

AU - Wright, Geraldine A.

AU - Carlton, Michelle

AU - Smith, Brian

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - Animals sample sensory stimuli for longer periods when they must perform difficult discrimination tasks, implying that the brain's ability to represent stimuli improves as a function of time. Although it is true in other senses, few studies have examined whether increasing sampling time improves olfactory discrimination. In the experiments reported here, odor sampling time was controlled with the goal of testing whether odor concentration affected a honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and discriminate odors. Increasing sampling time during conditioning and testing improved a honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and differentiate low-concentration (0.0002 M) odors. For intermediate-concentration (0.02 M) odors, both acquisition and recognition improved when stimulus duration was longer, but discrimination was unaffected. Having longer to sample a high-concentration (2.0 M) stimulus also improved acquisition, but it did not affect the ability to recognize or differentiate odors. Differences in time to respond to the conditioned and novel odors during the test period depended on the difficulty of the discrimination task. The results suggest that the sensory coding of molecular identity takes longer for low-concentration odors.

AB - Animals sample sensory stimuli for longer periods when they must perform difficult discrimination tasks, implying that the brain's ability to represent stimuli improves as a function of time. Although it is true in other senses, few studies have examined whether increasing sampling time improves olfactory discrimination. In the experiments reported here, odor sampling time was controlled with the goal of testing whether odor concentration affected a honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and discriminate odors. Increasing sampling time during conditioning and testing improved a honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and differentiate low-concentration (0.0002 M) odors. For intermediate-concentration (0.02 M) odors, both acquisition and recognition improved when stimulus duration was longer, but discrimination was unaffected. Having longer to sample a high-concentration (2.0 M) stimulus also improved acquisition, but it did not affect the ability to recognize or differentiate odors. Differences in time to respond to the conditioned and novel odors during the test period depended on the difficulty of the discrimination task. The results suggest that the sensory coding of molecular identity takes longer for low-concentration odors.

KW - antennal lobe

KW - honeybee

KW - olfaction

KW - speed-accuracy trade-off

KW - temporal coding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60549085219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60549085219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0014040

DO - 10.1037/a0014040

M3 - Article

C2 - 19170428

AN - SCOPUS:60549085219

VL - 123

SP - 36

EP - 43

JO - Behavioral Neuroscience

JF - Behavioral Neuroscience

SN - 0735-7044

IS - 1

ER -