Abstract

We have implemented full online delivery of the undergraduate electrical engineering program at a large public university (Arizona State University). This paper describes the objectives for the program, its implementation and an assessment of student performance. The curriculum, admissions standards, accreditation and faculty delivering the program are identical for face-to-face and online delivery. The program was initially conceived primarily to extend the access to our existing program to more underserved student populations. Our enrolment statistics show that this goal has been achieved to an extent much greater than anticipated. The characteristics of the online students enrolled in online delivery (age, professional experience, veteran/military status etc.) differ from those of the students enrolled face-to-face. Another goal of the program is to develop and instructional approach that leverage the technology of online delivery to fundamentally change how student access the material and organize it according to their individual learning styles. We have developed course materials that are very dense, highly efficient and flexibly delivered. Our approach is completely different from "lecture-capture" approaches to online delivery. Our assessment process shows that there is very little difference in student performance between the face-to-face delivery and online delivery. Significant challenges for our online delivery have been the development of laboratory experiences and the proctoring of exams. Our assessment of student outcomes shows that students enrolled online have achieved the outcomes related to the laboratory exercises. We have engaged an external proctoring company to independently verify and monitor the academic integrity of the online exam process. Another challenge is acceptance of online delivery among our constituencies. This has been achieved to a large extent as verified by the unexpectedly large demand among our students, the willingness of employers to fund tuition and fees, the enthusiastic participation among a growing group of faculty members and discussions of our external advisory board which is dominated by industry members. A recent accreditation visit provides additional evidence of acceptance among the engineering community.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
PublisherAmerican Society for Engineering Education
Volume2016-June
StatePublished - Jun 26 2016
Event123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition - New Orleans, United States
Duration: Jun 26 2016Jun 29 2016

Other

Other123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
CountryUnited States
CityNew Orleans
Period6/26/166/29/16

Fingerprint

Electrical engineering
Students
Accreditation
Curricula
Industry
Statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Phillips, S., & Saraniti, M. (2016). A fully online accredited undergraduate electrical engineering program. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (Vol. 2016-June). American Society for Engineering Education.

A fully online accredited undergraduate electrical engineering program. / Phillips, Stephen; Saraniti, Marco.

2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Vol. 2016-June American Society for Engineering Education, 2016.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Phillips, S & Saraniti, M 2016, A fully online accredited undergraduate electrical engineering program. in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. vol. 2016-June, American Society for Engineering Education, 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, United States, 6/26/16.
Phillips S, Saraniti M. A fully online accredited undergraduate electrical engineering program. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Vol. 2016-June. American Society for Engineering Education. 2016
Phillips, Stephen ; Saraniti, Marco. / A fully online accredited undergraduate electrical engineering program. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Vol. 2016-June American Society for Engineering Education, 2016.
@inproceedings{596c1ce6dc824e8d8024048fc5e30ca8,
title = "A fully online accredited undergraduate electrical engineering program",
abstract = "We have implemented full online delivery of the undergraduate electrical engineering program at a large public university (Arizona State University). This paper describes the objectives for the program, its implementation and an assessment of student performance. The curriculum, admissions standards, accreditation and faculty delivering the program are identical for face-to-face and online delivery. The program was initially conceived primarily to extend the access to our existing program to more underserved student populations. Our enrolment statistics show that this goal has been achieved to an extent much greater than anticipated. The characteristics of the online students enrolled in online delivery (age, professional experience, veteran/military status etc.) differ from those of the students enrolled face-to-face. Another goal of the program is to develop and instructional approach that leverage the technology of online delivery to fundamentally change how student access the material and organize it according to their individual learning styles. We have developed course materials that are very dense, highly efficient and flexibly delivered. Our approach is completely different from {"}lecture-capture{"} approaches to online delivery. Our assessment process shows that there is very little difference in student performance between the face-to-face delivery and online delivery. Significant challenges for our online delivery have been the development of laboratory experiences and the proctoring of exams. Our assessment of student outcomes shows that students enrolled online have achieved the outcomes related to the laboratory exercises. We have engaged an external proctoring company to independently verify and monitor the academic integrity of the online exam process. Another challenge is acceptance of online delivery among our constituencies. This has been achieved to a large extent as verified by the unexpectedly large demand among our students, the willingness of employers to fund tuition and fees, the enthusiastic participation among a growing group of faculty members and discussions of our external advisory board which is dominated by industry members. A recent accreditation visit provides additional evidence of acceptance among the engineering community.",
author = "Stephen Phillips and Marco Saraniti",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "26",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2016-June",
booktitle = "2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition",
publisher = "American Society for Engineering Education",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A fully online accredited undergraduate electrical engineering program

AU - Phillips, Stephen

AU - Saraniti, Marco

PY - 2016/6/26

Y1 - 2016/6/26

N2 - We have implemented full online delivery of the undergraduate electrical engineering program at a large public university (Arizona State University). This paper describes the objectives for the program, its implementation and an assessment of student performance. The curriculum, admissions standards, accreditation and faculty delivering the program are identical for face-to-face and online delivery. The program was initially conceived primarily to extend the access to our existing program to more underserved student populations. Our enrolment statistics show that this goal has been achieved to an extent much greater than anticipated. The characteristics of the online students enrolled in online delivery (age, professional experience, veteran/military status etc.) differ from those of the students enrolled face-to-face. Another goal of the program is to develop and instructional approach that leverage the technology of online delivery to fundamentally change how student access the material and organize it according to their individual learning styles. We have developed course materials that are very dense, highly efficient and flexibly delivered. Our approach is completely different from "lecture-capture" approaches to online delivery. Our assessment process shows that there is very little difference in student performance between the face-to-face delivery and online delivery. Significant challenges for our online delivery have been the development of laboratory experiences and the proctoring of exams. Our assessment of student outcomes shows that students enrolled online have achieved the outcomes related to the laboratory exercises. We have engaged an external proctoring company to independently verify and monitor the academic integrity of the online exam process. Another challenge is acceptance of online delivery among our constituencies. This has been achieved to a large extent as verified by the unexpectedly large demand among our students, the willingness of employers to fund tuition and fees, the enthusiastic participation among a growing group of faculty members and discussions of our external advisory board which is dominated by industry members. A recent accreditation visit provides additional evidence of acceptance among the engineering community.

AB - We have implemented full online delivery of the undergraduate electrical engineering program at a large public university (Arizona State University). This paper describes the objectives for the program, its implementation and an assessment of student performance. The curriculum, admissions standards, accreditation and faculty delivering the program are identical for face-to-face and online delivery. The program was initially conceived primarily to extend the access to our existing program to more underserved student populations. Our enrolment statistics show that this goal has been achieved to an extent much greater than anticipated. The characteristics of the online students enrolled in online delivery (age, professional experience, veteran/military status etc.) differ from those of the students enrolled face-to-face. Another goal of the program is to develop and instructional approach that leverage the technology of online delivery to fundamentally change how student access the material and organize it according to their individual learning styles. We have developed course materials that are very dense, highly efficient and flexibly delivered. Our approach is completely different from "lecture-capture" approaches to online delivery. Our assessment process shows that there is very little difference in student performance between the face-to-face delivery and online delivery. Significant challenges for our online delivery have been the development of laboratory experiences and the proctoring of exams. Our assessment of student outcomes shows that students enrolled online have achieved the outcomes related to the laboratory exercises. We have engaged an external proctoring company to independently verify and monitor the academic integrity of the online exam process. Another challenge is acceptance of online delivery among our constituencies. This has been achieved to a large extent as verified by the unexpectedly large demand among our students, the willingness of employers to fund tuition and fees, the enthusiastic participation among a growing group of faculty members and discussions of our external advisory board which is dominated by industry members. A recent accreditation visit provides additional evidence of acceptance among the engineering community.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983350810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983350810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84983350810

VL - 2016-June

BT - 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition

PB - American Society for Engineering Education

ER -