A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems

Maja Schlüter, Andres Baeza, Gunnar Dressler, Karin Frank, Jürgen Groeneveld, Wander Jager, Marco A. Janssen, Ryan R J McAllister, Birgit Müller, Kirill Orach, Nina Schwarz, Nanda Wijermans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 10 Citations

Abstract

Formal models are commonly used in natural resource management (NRM) to study human-environment interactions and inform policy making. In the majority of applications, human behaviour is represented by the rational actor model despite growing empirical evidence of its shortcomings in NRM contexts. While the importance of accounting for the complexity of human behaviour is increasingly recognized, its integration into formal models remains a major challenge. The challenges are multiple: i) there exist many theories scattered across the social sciences, ii) most theories cover only a certain aspect of decision-making, iii) they vary in their degree of formalization, iv) causal mechanisms are often not specified. We provide a framework- MoHuB (Modelling Human Behavior) - to facilitate a broader inclusion of theories on human decision-making in formal NRM models. It serves as a tool and common language to describe, compare and communicate alternative theories. In doing so, we not only enhance understanding of commonalities and differences between theories, but take a first step towards tackling the challenges mentioned above. This approach may enable modellers to find and formalize relevant theories, and be more explicit and inclusive about theories of human decision making in the analysis of social-ecological systems.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages21-35
Number of pages15
JournalEcological Economics
Volume131
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

human behavior
resource management
natural resource
decision making
Behavioral theory
Social-ecological systems
policy making
modeling
Human behavior
Natural resource management
Decision making
Formal model

Keywords

  • Bounded rationality
  • Descriptive norm
  • Habitual
  • Human decision-making
  • Natural resource management
  • Prospect theory
  • Rational actor
  • Reinforcement learning
  • Theory of planned behaviour

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Schlüter, M., Baeza, A., Dressler, G., Frank, K., Groeneveld, J., Jager, W., ... Wijermans, N. (2017). A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems. Ecological Economics, 131, 21-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.008

A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems. / Schlüter, Maja; Baeza, Andres; Dressler, Gunnar; Frank, Karin; Groeneveld, Jürgen; Jager, Wander; Janssen, Marco A.; McAllister, Ryan R J; Müller, Birgit; Orach, Kirill; Schwarz, Nina; Wijermans, Nanda.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 131, 01.01.2017, p. 21-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schlüter, M, Baeza, A, Dressler, G, Frank, K, Groeneveld, J, Jager, W, Janssen, MA, McAllister, RRJ, Müller, B, Orach, K, Schwarz, N & Wijermans, N 2017, 'A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems' Ecological Economics, vol 131, pp. 21-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.008
Schlüter M, Baeza A, Dressler G, Frank K, Groeneveld J, Jager W et al. A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems. Ecological Economics. 2017 Jan 1;131:21-35. Available from, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.008
Schlüter, Maja ; Baeza, Andres ; Dressler, Gunnar ; Frank, Karin ; Groeneveld, Jürgen ; Jager, Wander ; Janssen, Marco A. ; McAllister, Ryan R J ; Müller, Birgit ; Orach, Kirill ; Schwarz, Nina ; Wijermans, Nanda. / A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems. In: Ecological Economics. 2017 ; Vol. 131. pp. 21-35
@article{a7ce242c267542ffbbd17e647771b14c,
title = "A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems",
abstract = "Formal models are commonly used in natural resource management (NRM) to study human-environment interactions and inform policy making. In the majority of applications, human behaviour is represented by the rational actor model despite growing empirical evidence of its shortcomings in NRM contexts. While the importance of accounting for the complexity of human behaviour is increasingly recognized, its integration into formal models remains a major challenge. The challenges are multiple: i) there exist many theories scattered across the social sciences, ii) most theories cover only a certain aspect of decision-making, iii) they vary in their degree of formalization, iv) causal mechanisms are often not specified. We provide a framework- MoHuB (Modelling Human Behavior) - to facilitate a broader inclusion of theories on human decision-making in formal NRM models. It serves as a tool and common language to describe, compare and communicate alternative theories. In doing so, we not only enhance understanding of commonalities and differences between theories, but take a first step towards tackling the challenges mentioned above. This approach may enable modellers to find and formalize relevant theories, and be more explicit and inclusive about theories of human decision making in the analysis of social-ecological systems.",
keywords = "Bounded rationality, Descriptive norm, Habitual, Human decision-making, Natural resource management, Prospect theory, Rational actor, Reinforcement learning, Theory of planned behaviour",
author = "Maja Schl\{"u}ter and Andres Baeza and Gunnar Dressler and Karin Frank and J\{"u}rgen Groeneveld and Wander Jager and Janssen, {Marco A.} and McAllister, {Ryan R J} and Birgit M\{"u}ller and Kirill Orach and Nina Schwarz and Nanda Wijermans",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "131",
pages = "21--35",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems

AU - Schlüter,Maja

AU - Baeza,Andres

AU - Dressler,Gunnar

AU - Frank,Karin

AU - Groeneveld,Jürgen

AU - Jager,Wander

AU - Janssen,Marco A.

AU - McAllister,Ryan R J

AU - Müller,Birgit

AU - Orach,Kirill

AU - Schwarz,Nina

AU - Wijermans,Nanda

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Formal models are commonly used in natural resource management (NRM) to study human-environment interactions and inform policy making. In the majority of applications, human behaviour is represented by the rational actor model despite growing empirical evidence of its shortcomings in NRM contexts. While the importance of accounting for the complexity of human behaviour is increasingly recognized, its integration into formal models remains a major challenge. The challenges are multiple: i) there exist many theories scattered across the social sciences, ii) most theories cover only a certain aspect of decision-making, iii) they vary in their degree of formalization, iv) causal mechanisms are often not specified. We provide a framework- MoHuB (Modelling Human Behavior) - to facilitate a broader inclusion of theories on human decision-making in formal NRM models. It serves as a tool and common language to describe, compare and communicate alternative theories. In doing so, we not only enhance understanding of commonalities and differences between theories, but take a first step towards tackling the challenges mentioned above. This approach may enable modellers to find and formalize relevant theories, and be more explicit and inclusive about theories of human decision making in the analysis of social-ecological systems.

AB - Formal models are commonly used in natural resource management (NRM) to study human-environment interactions and inform policy making. In the majority of applications, human behaviour is represented by the rational actor model despite growing empirical evidence of its shortcomings in NRM contexts. While the importance of accounting for the complexity of human behaviour is increasingly recognized, its integration into formal models remains a major challenge. The challenges are multiple: i) there exist many theories scattered across the social sciences, ii) most theories cover only a certain aspect of decision-making, iii) they vary in their degree of formalization, iv) causal mechanisms are often not specified. We provide a framework- MoHuB (Modelling Human Behavior) - to facilitate a broader inclusion of theories on human decision-making in formal NRM models. It serves as a tool and common language to describe, compare and communicate alternative theories. In doing so, we not only enhance understanding of commonalities and differences between theories, but take a first step towards tackling the challenges mentioned above. This approach may enable modellers to find and formalize relevant theories, and be more explicit and inclusive about theories of human decision making in the analysis of social-ecological systems.

KW - Bounded rationality

KW - Descriptive norm

KW - Habitual

KW - Human decision-making

KW - Natural resource management

KW - Prospect theory

KW - Rational actor

KW - Reinforcement learning

KW - Theory of planned behaviour

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983509062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983509062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.008

M3 - Article

VL - 131

SP - 21

EP - 35

JO - Ecological Economics

T2 - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -